Besides the factors above, insurance companies have to
consider injury to people, property damage, and legal ramifications as well.
Not exact matches
People used
to criticise his so called languid on and off style but I
consider it economical and allows him
to be at his best when the ball comes
to him also may be a godsend in preventing
injury.
many papers claiming Vidal
to Arsenal is done especialy La stampla from Chile, which broke news on Alexis
to Arsenal, damn if we get him,
people say where he will play, he can play everywhere, which is amazing, add his fighting mentality and quality, Cech and Vidal would transform our team
to world beaters,
considering our
injury record this signing makes sense, but i still doubt we will sign him and for 21m LOL
When it comes
to shoulder
injuries I would
consider myself a
person that is well educated on the area of shoulder
injuries and in particular shoulder dislocations.
A
person on temporary assignment shall be
considered on temporary assignment duty
to regular work assignments of the sending agency; shall be entitled
to all benefits
to which the
person would otherwise be entitled, including compensation for
injury or disability; shall receive the same salary and benefits as at the
person's regular assignment; and shall remain an employee of the permanent employer for all purposes, except that the
person shall be supervised by the agency
to which assigned.
Only two
people, a male and female from different vehicles, wound up being hurt, and their
injuries are not
considered life - threatening, though they were transported
to the hospital by Highland Park and Northbrook paramedics.
For example, for the issue of Navient putting
people into forbearance when it was not in their best interest, Navient says, «Here, the alleged
injury — borrowers entering forbearance without
considering alternative repayment plans — was entirely «avoidable» because federally mandated notices and other disclosures provided borrowers with the necessary information
to make a «free and informed choice» regarding forbearance and alternative repayment options.»
I have had three normal nail
injuries (no dewclaws) in 25 + years in dogs, none of which caused any long term problems, and my research both online as well as in
person with many vets over the years show the same sort of low numbers of actual front dewclaw
injury... certainly not enough of a statistical problem
to ever warrant even
considering the needless removal of all dewclaws in all puppies.
* has spent a number of years studying and learning about their breed * is active in one or more breed clubs or similar groups and thus is in regular contact with other
people in the breed * knows their breeding stock inside and out for several generations back * has an «eye for a dog» and has developed a detailed picture of the type of dog they're breeding toward * almost always compete in some in some sort of activity with their dogs (conformation, working activities, obedience etc.) so as
to have a realistic idea of how their dogs compare
to others of the same the breed * is knowledgable about the hereditary problems that occur in their breed and has the appropriate tests done prior
to breeding in order
to decrease the likelihood of their occurance in their pups *
considers temperament important * is knowledgable about the mating and whelping of dogs in general, so as
to minimize the chances of
injury or death
to the breeding dogs * is extremely concerned with the quality of the homes that their puppies are destinied for,
to the point of not performing a breeding if they don't feel good homes will be available for the pups * never has more dogs of their own than they are properly able
to care for * is willing and able
to educate and build a relationship with their puppy buyers * is honest * uses spay / neuter contracts and / or limited registration
to prevent the casual breeding of their puppies * is ALWAYS willing
to take back a dog of their breeding if a puppy buyer can not keep it for any reason.
You agree that any User Content: will be accurate; will not violate or facilitate the violation of any law or regulation; will not violate any right of a third party, including copyright, trademark, privacy, or publicity rights; will not cause
injury to any
person or entity; and will not contain, or provide links
to, obscene, profane, or threatening language, malware, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings, any form of spam, or any material that could be
considered harmful, sexually explicit, indecent, lewd, violent, abusive, or degrading.
People of all ages
consider Miami
to be the number one city for active travelers of all ages, but a high volume of traffic means that there are greater chances for
injury and accidents.
If another
person is responsible for causing your
injury you may want
to consider filing a personal
injury lawsuit.
The correct approach was
to consider the reaction
to the
injury of a reasonable
person in the objective circumstances of the claimant.
Guidance is given in s 14 (2): for the purposes of s 14 (1) an
injury is significant if the
person whose date of knowledge is in question would reasonably have
considered it sufficiently serious
to justify his instituting proceedings for damages against a defendant who did not dispute liability and was able
to satisfy a judgment.
The question was whether a
person in the claimant's position would reasonably have
considered the
injury sufficiently serious
to justify instituting proceedings.
Instead, the law requires that a
person bringing a birth
injury claim based on cerebral palsy or another condition show that the doctor failed
to act as a reasonable and prudent doctor would have acted,
considering their specialty and the level of care generally used by doctors in the same specialty.
In order for another
person to be
considered negligent, it must be proven that they were a duty of care in the situation in which the
injury took place.
If your
injury is categorised as «crumbling skull», then the
person that injured you will be
considered to be liable for the events which caused the
injury to get worse.
Generally, factors that are
considered are the type and severity of the
injuries, the extent of pain a
person has endured and / or will continue
to endure as a result of the
injuries, and the impact of the
injuries on the
person's employment, recreational and day -
to - day activities, psychological well - being and personal relationships.
When you've been injured from the negligent actions of another
person, you may want
to consider speaking
to a Washington DC personal
injury lawyer.
A dog is
considered dangerous if it attacks and injures a
person, pet or farm animal without justification, or if it «behaves in a manner which a reasonable
person would believe poses a serious and unjustified imminent threat of serious physical
injury or death»
to a
person, pet or farm animal.
Property defects that are
considered «open and obvious» are conditions which the court believes a reasonable
person should have seen and avoided
to prevent
injury.
The owner or «lawful custodian» of a dangerous dog is
considered strictly liable for any medical costs resulting from an
injury the animal causes
to a
person, pet, farm animal or domestic animal.
«(1)[Subject
to subsection (1A) below,] In sections 11 and 12 of this Act references
to a
person's date of knowledge are references
to the date on which he first had knowledge of the following facts --(a) that the
injury in question was significant... (2) For the purposes of this section an
injury is significant if the
person whose date of knowledge is in question would reasonably have
considered it sufficiently serious
to justify his instituting proceedings for damages against a defendant who did not dispute liability and was able
to satisfy a judgment.
You're
considering legal action because you want
to recover money from the
person who caused your
injury, right?
Several variables, such as the age of the injured
person and how long they will have
to live with the
injury, the injured
person's prior health, and the likelihood of future recovery need
to be
considered when deciding how much
to pursue in damages.
Many
people may
consider injuries from slip and falls
to be relatively minor or inconsequential, but this is not always the case.
If you are
considering hiring an
injury lawyer in Santa Monica, call Harris Personal
Injury Lawyers
to schedule a free case consultation over the phone or in
person.
If an accident or
injury was attributed specifically
to one employee's negligence (
consider if a store employee failed
to put a mop away and a customer tripped and fell over it), that
person may be implicated as a responsible party, but more often, the wrongdoer is still
considered the business entity that owns the property.
A party is
considered negligent if they have caused
injury to another
person by behaving thoughtlessly or carelessly.
If you have suffered
injury due
to another
person's negligence, you may be
considering a personal
injury claim.
This lopsided reality created a lot of pressure on
people advancing ICBC
injury claims in BC Supreme Court
to consider settlement when faced with a Rule 37 formal settlement offer.
A part of the Litigation Section, the Tort Committee
considers all matters relating
to injury and damage
to persons and property.
People who've experienced an illness or
injury and found themselves buried in bills (even if they have health insurance) may
consider > filing bankruptcy as a way
to get out of debt.
In other words, if a
person acted in a manner that others would not
consider reasonable, failed
to follow boating safety rules and was not mindful of the safety of their passengers and other boaters, he or she could well be
considered negligent, therefore liable for the
injuries sustained by others.
Furthermore, if you are looking for the right
person to represent you as a personal
injury lawyer
consider the following factors: A lawyer who is inquisitive and takes time
to know about your life, accident, limitations and even
injuries.
People who have suffered burns on the job should
consider talking with a job
injury attorney about their case early in the workers» compensation process
to make sure that they understand their legal rights and are being treated fairly by their employer or its insurance company.
The elderly are often susceptible
to greater
injuries than younger
people, but this susceptibility is not
to be
considered in awarding damages.
Brain trauma is
considered to be one of the most serious types of
injuries a
person can sustain.
If you're looking
to get in front of more eyeballs quicker, you may
consider replying
to the Avvo Q&A or reviewing Quora.com for questions
people are asking questions related
to personal
injury.
Reacting
to comments made by Cardiff Law School academic Annette Morris at the Westminster Legal Policy Forum that ministers must «adapt» the claims system and portal
to handle litigants in
person (LiP) before
considering raising the small claims limit, David Stothard, an expert in the medical and legal aspects of personal
injury claims and director of MAPS Medical Reporting says that for LiPs not
to struggle with the claims process would require a complete overhaul of the system.
If you, your traveling companion or an immediate family member suffers an illness or
injury that's disabling enough
to make a reasonable
person cancel a trip, Allianz Global Assistance
considers that a covered reason for trip cancellation.
A minimum of $ 25,000 per
person and $ 50,000 per accident for bodily
injury liability and $ 25,000 per accident for property damage liability, is required by law, but drivers are strongly urged
to consider higher limits.
For example, an office assistant would not be
considered a key
person for the purposes of insurance as that position could readily be filled rather quickly and without considerable
injury to the business.
Personal property protection for your car, personal
injury coverage, and uninsured motorist protection are all types of coverage that
people will
consider adding
to their policy if they are looking for a more complete policy.
Thus it may be beneficial
to a
person in Florida
to consider increasing the coverage amounts on your property damage and bodily
injury liability policies.
Many
people consider this area of a car insurance policy redundant, and it is in a sense; but this is programmed redundancy designed
to protect you from having
to deal with expensive medical costs when
injury accidents occur.
They
considered this as misdemeanor if it really causes threat like destruction of property and
injury to people.