Ten bucks says that Ruth or someone in her family or circle of friends is collecting - welfare, social security, medicare, medicaid, unemployment - all of those things that people like
her consider an evil handout.
Did you know that there was a time when being left - handed was
considered evil?
I would qualify that to «wantonly and willingly harming another»... as to cause harm in a way that may seem wanton, but is not necessarily intentional, would not be something
I consider evil.
Christians should stop trying to remove everything
they consider evil from the world.
There have been many points in history where some things were not
considered evil..
So, not believing in God is what
you consider evil?
The idols of moral people are not usually what we would
consider evils; but a good for which we have an inordinate love, something intrinsically good that we love more that God.
I'm
considered an evil genious in many circles, and I take pride in the fact that I kept some of the more useful parts of christian upbringing.
You're assuming that what a human would
consider evil is what a god would
consider evil.
How can you NOT
consider that evil?
They believe in a god who is going to kill / maim and destroy most of humanity, because they can not reconcile the concept of a god who is fully capable of accomplishing his will: to be the saviour of all humanity, because that would mean accepting the reconciliation of
those they consider evil.
A person
you consider evil may be a hero to another person.
@brad: Yes, let's laugh at Planned Parenthood that provides cheap or free healthcare to women in need while we try to defund them so women are left without breast exams, and yearly checkups in a country where the idea of having comprehensive healthcare for every man, woman and child is
considered an evil encroachment on freedom.
Chewing someone's face off can be
considered evil, but it's probably more likely in the recent case that it was fundamentally psychotic.
But he has never
considered evil an absolute, nor has he lost faith in its possible redemption.
In a mind control cult any information from outside the cult is
considered evil, especially if it is opposing the cult.
The act itself, picking the fruit, is
considered evil... a sin.
... I learned that you, Lycidas, should be ready to respond with your verses when those «followers» of Mine say that I do not create Evil and evil things... imagine that, a verse from their «Bible» that says I do those things that humans
consider evil...
@Jaz - There is nothing wrong with a gay couple adopting a child, now if that gay couple was going to adopt a child and believed that all straight ppl were living a lifestyle that was
considered evil and a sin and were going to teach that type of hatred to the child, then they should not be allowed to adopt, pretty simple logic that goes both ways.
You are correct, most people would
consider it evil to torture someone to settle a bet.
Whether a particular hurtful behavior, like the taking of a life, can be
considered evil depends on the context in which it occurs and the intentions of the person committing the behavior.
For a particular behavior to be
considered evil, the person committing the act must be in a position to knowingly make a moral choice between doing something wrong and doing something right, choosing the bad action over the good.
In either case, it seems at times painfully absurd when one
considers the evils to which he himself had earlier, and for several years, allied himself.
Aside from listing Makhno (whome anyone USSR - born, left or right wing, generally
considers an evil butcher warlord as opposed to a libertarian - anarchist thinker), excellent answer.
This odd lemur is
considered evil: Dead aye - ayes are often hung upside down outside a village to ward off evil spirits.
It was no staple to medieval fashionistas, though, being
considered evil back in the day, but for the last 150 years or so stripes have been having a moment, thanks to devotees from Queen Victoria to Jean - Paul Gaultier, by way of Audrey Hepburn, Twiggy and the 1960s.
Where is the line that a dating site must cross to be
considered evil?
Far be it from an elf to be
considered evil, this pale skinned dude is known for his bad dialogue and even worse ponytail.
Anyone who has had a younger sibling
they considered evil can probably relate to Eoin Colfer's inspiration for Artemis Fowl.
I don't want to support companies that are harming people or promoting what I would
consider evil in the world.
According to my research, information about how cults actually work sheds some light on why that might be: In a cult, «any information from outside the cult is
considered evil, especially if it is opposing the cult.»
They still do things in error that others
consider evil, and have to get hit over the head with a clue - stick to get them to stop.
Not exact matches
Most of these habits are so normalized that we
consider our dissipated hours and lives as something less than
evil.
Most of us
consider a refund to be the lesser of two
evils.
Some businesses don't
consider that their business» website is this important, instead they think that their website is just a necessary
evil of being in business and just «tick the box» of having one.
(NB: Cocaine was, at the time,
considered a wonder drug — perhaps like bitcoin in more modern times — but was eventually condemned, made illegal, and deemed an «
evil» by Holmes in later works.)
what you believe is not «biblically based», it's indoctrination about ideas that came from warping and exagerating ideas that existed in «pagan» (not actually the correct term but good for this purpose) mythologies, and the
evil imaginations of men like Dante and those who desired to see those they
considered inferior in doctrine, belief, religion or culture in torture.
Even in more modern times there are people that
consider it awkward though no longer
evil and don't want their kids to be left - handed.
I always have
considered myself to be an atheist but no way an
evil or bad person.
I can't think of any compelling reasons for me to
consider the thoughts or feelings of
evil, black souled sinners like that wh0r3.
Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire
evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to
consider ANY possibility of hell at all.
I have gone to evangelical churches who
considered Democrats to be literally pure
evil and would never allow one to worship openly in their midst.
And while conversion may not be looked upon as
evil to one who is already converted, it is most definitely
evil to those who are told they must convert before they are
considered good human beings.
Consider Joel, what «The Bible» really says about «an eye for an eye»: Mat 5:38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: Mat 5:39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not
evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Considering that all these horrific things in the bible occur in close to 4000 years ago in a time and world culture you obviously can't be that familiar with makes you the perfect judge on how
evil the bible is.
If you were to base your definitions of «good» and «
evil» on human society, well, it's easy to see how people would
consider God to be
evil.
When we
consider the historical reality and the spiritual imagery together, what we see in Genesis 6 - 8 is the near victory of the forces of
evil against the power of God so that the waters threaten to kill everything that has the breath of life.
The question was originally intended to be based off our current social views of good and
evil considering they change slightly every few years.
I
consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or
evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad /
evil side of the minds of the writers.
In this post, I
consider a question sent in to me by a reader about whether or not God can look upon sin and
evil.