Sentences with phrase «consider joint parenting»

In this way, the court can consider joint parenting after reviewing the parents resolution.

However, courts consider that when a former spouse helped raise the children, custody or visitation award must consider joint parenting, and thus assure that children have frequent and continuing contact with both parents.

Not exact matches

Parents interested in a joint legal custody arrangement should first consider the level of communication between themselves and the child's other parent.

In North Carolina, joint custody will be considered if one or both parents request it.

A court in Utah will always consider joint physical or legal custody if both parties have completed a parenting plan and if joint custody serves the best interests of the child.

This is still considered joint physical custody because the parent who has the children on the weekend is spending pretty much equal time with them as the parent who has them from after school on Monday until beginning of school on Friday since the weekend parent is with them all day Saturday and Sunday, as well as rest of the day Friday.

California family courts consider a number of factors before granting a parent either sole custody or joint custody, but parents who wish to file for child custody in California should first become familiar with the laws in the state.

Under Alabama law, a court may consider an award of joint custody, whereby the parental rights of both parties remain intact, with one parent as the primary custodian of the children and the other as the secondary custodian.

If both parents have joint legal custody, then intentionally excluding the other parent in the decision - making process may be considered contempt of court.

In deciding whether to grant joint custody, the court shall consider all of the above factors plus whether the parents will be able to cooperate; whether the parents have agreed to joint custody.

Prior to making a decision about joint custody, the court will consider whether both parents agree to a joint physical custody arrangement.

Considering the amount to be ~ 50 Lakh from brother and close to about ~ 30 Crores from parents (joint account).

Can this carryforward be used on her 2013 joint return with Angie, considering that the adoption is now a second - parent adoption?

Judges are required to consider possible joint custody in every case, but there's no presumption in favor of this unless both parents agree.

Often, a parent who has spends less than half time with a child still considers it very important that the legal designation is for joint custody.

When both parents want to be actively involved in the child's life, shared custody and joint custody will be considered.

If a parent awarded joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal custody is relocating the residence of the minor child to a location which is one hundred fifty miles or more from the residence of the minor child at the time that custody was awarded, the court may consider the relocation a substantial change in circumstances.

In 2012 our legislature enacted S.C. Code § 63-15-230 (C), which reads, «If custody is contested or if either parent seeks an award of joint custody, the court shall consider all custody options, including, but not limited to, joint custody, and, in its final order, the court shall state its determination as to custody and shall state its reasoning for that decision.»

After considering the jurisprudence with respect to the double - bind question, the Court found that the risk of it resulting in a presumptive disposition may be greater where a joint custody or shared residency arrangement requiring both parents to reside in the same locale is in the best interests of the child.

The court is guided by the best interests of the child, and considers: the relationship of the child with each parent and the ability and disposition of each parent to provide the child with love, affection and guidance, the ability and disposition of each parent to assure that the child receives adequate food, clothing, medical care, other material needs and a safe environment, the ability and disposition of each parent to meet the child's present and future developmental needs, the quality of the child's adjustment to the child's present housing, school and community and the potential effect of any change, the ability and disposition of each parent to foster a positive relationship and frequent and continuing contact with the other parent, including physical contact, except where contact will result in harm to the child or to a parent, the quality of the child's relationship with the primary care provider, if appropriate given the child's age and development, the relationship of the child with any other person who may significantly affect the child, the ability and disposition of the parents to communicate, cooperate with each other and make joint decisions concerning the children where parental rights and responsibilities are to be shared or divided, and any evidence of abuse.

If the other parent doesn't agree, consider this; Courts generally don't like to award sole custody to one parent without substantial evidence that joint custody is not in the child's best interest.

The court may also consider additional factors found in Section 3109.04 (F)(2) if the parents are seeking joint custody.

While the law favored joint custody, unless the parents agreed on a different arrangement, judges could consider a number of factors that might make a joint custody arrangement unfeasible.

Joint physical and joint legal custody demands that that both parents are consideredJoint physical and joint legal custody demands that that both parents are consideredjoint legal custody demands that that both parents are considered fit.

New Mexico law expresses a preference for parents to share as equally as practically possible in the custody of a child in a divorce case, so joint custody is considered beneficial for the child.

Other factors are also listed in considering joint custody between parents.

[FN29] In type 2 cases (female - initiated violence), fathers should be encouraged to pursue primary custody of their children; [FN30] in type 3 cases (male - controlled interactive violence), both parents are poor role models, but «the parent who can better provide a violence - free environment should be considered as the potential primary caretaker for the child,» [FN31] while in type 4 cases (separation and postdivorce violence), «a range of custody plans, including joint physical custody, are appropriate.»

In Massachusetts, joint legal custody tends to be the most common arrangement, but some judges consider sole legal custody if the parents seem incapable of communicating effectively.

Courts consider joint custody favorably because it promotes the continuing relationship between the parents and the child, and both parents have joint rights and responsibilities in childrearing.

The Arizona Child Support Guidelines now take parenting time into considering because in recent years more divorced parents practice joint parenting.

In determining joint custody, courts consider any parental agreement (or lack of agreement) about custody decisions, any unreasonable disagreement made by a parent, the ability of the parents to cooperate, and the logical possibility of joint custody.

In cases where both parents have been actively involved with the child, many states require judges to consider joint custody.

The court considers joint custody upon the request of either parent.

The court considers the distance between each parent's residence and if it's in close proximity to share joint custody of their child.

The potential for bartering away the child's financial resources because of a bad faith request for custody is reinforced by («friendly parent») provisions that give a preference to the parent requesting joint custody when the alternative of sole custody is considered by the court.

Although California courts typically consider joint legal custody and joint physical custody to be in a child's best interest, one or both parents can lose the right to share legal and physical custody.

Prior to making a decision about joint custody, the court will consider whether both parents agree to a joint physical custody arrangement.

When children divide time between the residences of both parents, either equally or substantially equally, the arrangement is considered to be joint residential or joint physical custody.

In North Carolina, joint custody will be considered if one or both parents request it.

Some states consider an unmarried mother to have full, sole custody of a child, while other states consider two unmarried parents to have joint custody of a child.

60/40 schedules are considered joint or shared custody schedules because both parents have significant and frequent contact with the children.

Prior to awarding custody, the court shall first consider awarding joint physical and legal custody to both parents.

A child specialist assisted with helping them see that a joint parenting plan was not only possible but also good for their son, and Ben is considering going forward with the second parent adoption.

Parents who had high scores on warmth, number of joint parent - child activities, supervision and rule - setting, but low scores on conflict and «home chaos», were considered to be highly skilled on this parenting index.

Parents who had high scores on warmth, number of joint activities, supervision and rule - setting, but low scores on conflict and «home chaos», were considered to have the highest skill in this parenting index.

Before involving a court of law in decisions involving joint legal custody, parents should first consider the best interest of the child.

Parents considering their custody options should consider the following «pros» of joint legal custody:

Any parent who is seeking joint legal custody should consider specifying the areas which require mutual agreement including the following:

The «persuasive» impact of joint custody statutes is compounded by friendly parent statutes which provide that in considering an award of sole custody, the court may consider which parent is most apt to allow the other to maintain frequent association and relationship with the child.

In Michigan, with or without the request of either parent, the court may consider ordering joint custody.