Frank, atheism is no more an ideology than asantaism is an ideology (I'm sure you lack a belief in Santa Claus and his Christmas Eve antics every year, yet I doubt you'd
consider that lack of belief an ideology).
Do
you consider lack of belief in leprechauns «faith»?
and would
you consider your lack of belief in fairies, which you aslo can't prove do not exist, as a form of faith?
Not exact matches
considering that theological
beliefs are irrational (that is, they obtain despite a
lack of evidence) why hold specific religious / theological views at all?
If you merely have a
lack of belief that Bigfoot is real (you do nt make the claim «Bigfoot does not exist»), why would you
consider anyone that does believe in Bigfootto have done so for completely irrational reasons??
Considering the religious
beliefs or
lack thereof
of our founding fathers, I find it difficult that we have only regressed in our intellectualism over the last 250 years, not progressed.
Christians rarely if ever
consider other
belief or
lack of (atheist).
you'd think if god was truly the god spoken
of then faith would be unneeded and
belief a thing
of the past — yet — people will believe whatever they wish no matter the proof or
lack there
of and its truly sad to
consider that this delusion type mass brainwashing is going on right now and has been for over 2000 years... please don't let the time in which this sm.ut has been around make you think its worth its wieght in salt — i bid Lot's wife its not — in ALL early man stories from around the globe people have created GRAND stories about the start and end
of times — its that simple.
Theologian John Cobb and other participants in the new hermeneutic discussion have asked whether,
considering the radical difference between first century and 20th century structures
of thought and
belief, this
lack of language is not a constant problem.
Dawid
considers why string theorists possess such a strong
belief in their theories despite the
lack of empirical confirmation.
Of course, no traditional publisher would ever have considered undertaking a project like LibriVox for so many reasons: the lack of quality control, the lack of business model and the lack of belief that so many people would be willing to do for free the kinds of things publishers do for mone
Of course, no traditional publisher would ever have
considered undertaking a project like LibriVox for so many reasons: the
lack of quality control, the lack of business model and the lack of belief that so many people would be willing to do for free the kinds of things publishers do for mone
of quality control, the
lack of business model and the lack of belief that so many people would be willing to do for free the kinds of things publishers do for mone
of business model and the
lack of belief that so many people would be willing to do for free the kinds of things publishers do for mone
of belief that so many people would be willing to do for free the kinds
of things publishers do for mone
of things publishers do for money.
Relative to the IPCC method that
considers the amount
of evidence and the consensus regarding this evidence, the IF method explicitly (and traceably) includes the estimated uncertainty due to
lack of knowledge, the incompleteness
of the information, and
belief in competing hypotheses.