In some cases, you may be able to apply again with a new resume, and even in those cases, there's a chance the employer will
consider the newer submission but there's no guarantee.
Not exact matches
The problem was, there used to be at least a handful of mags that
considered new writers, and they all dried up or flat out stopped accepting
submissions except from established authors, or (get this)
submissions from agents.
These below are more inline with the later - day movements in social media, platform choices etc — many of which need to be
considered by
new writers
considering the traditional publishing route also — because many traditional publishers now insist on seeing a growing author's platform before
considering submissions.
However, if you haven't executed an RSI
submission agreement in advance, neither RSI nor any of its employees or contractors may accept or
consider any unsolicited ideas, original creative artwork or other works, including, without limitation, ideas or suggestions for
new or improved games or technologies, game or product enhancements, marketing plans or names for
new games (collectively «Unsolicited Ideas»).
That was more than we were expecting,
considering the tight limitations we had around the
submissions and the fact that this is a
new project.
It appears that Muller has pushed to get the
new findings submitted now because Tuesday is the deadline for journal
submission for research to be
considered in the next climate science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be
considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be
considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a
new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a
submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
Here are links to our Coaltiion's
submissions to the
New Zealand Parliament Select Committee
considering the Climate Change Response (Moderated Emissions Trading Scheme) Amendment Bill:
Before taking
new matters into account based on statistics which have not been
considered in the judgment under appeal, the adversarial process requires that the court ensure that the parties are given an opportunity to deal with the
new information by making further
submissions, oral or written, and allowing, if requested, fresh material in response.