Many issues to
consider on both sides of the debate.
Not exact matches
Considering the consistent treatment
of this topic
on this blog & the magnitude
of the event (for both
sides of the
debate), that's a substantial miss.
Washington (CNN)-- As the Supreme Court
considers two major same - sex marriage cases that could change marriage in the United States, religious leaders
on both
sides of the
debate believe they are
on God's
side of the contentious issue.
Premier has been speaking to Christians
on both
sides of the Scottish independence
debate to find out what issues believers are
considering before casting their...
Politicians
on both
sides of the Scottish independence
debate realise how significant Scottish sporting figures will be as the nation
considers whether to end its 300 - year union with the rest
of the UK.
The ruling released
on Monday in a 5 - 3 decision is being
considered by advocates
on both
sides of the abortion
debate as one
of the most consequential in a generation from the high court.
In fact, exactly how the gut microbiome «interacts with foods to produce health conditions» is
considered a new and dynamic area for further research by individuals
on all
sides of the red meat - colon cancer
debate.10 For example, researchers at Harvard Medical School are studying fecal samples to assess the impact
of red meat intake
on gut microbes and their byproducts, which the researchers speculate may influence «biological pathways associated with colorectal cancer and other digestive diseases.»
No matter which
side of the
debate you are
on, the fact
of the matter is we need to
consider the validity
of the data we are using to drive instruction.
Years ago when I was interested in the creation / evolution
debate I discovered that there was a little known group
of information managers or handlers, I
consider them,
on the fundamentalist Christian
side.
On the other
side of the
debate, those
considering what the smallest viable habitats are or how to expand archives as an insurance policy say that recent trends have proved that old conservation strategies are no longer sufficient.
McKitrick is
considered by many
on the «skeptical»
side of the
debate to be an absolutely key player in the
debate about climate change, and the veracity / viability climate scientists and the work they produce.
It is challenging to have genuine good faith
debate when one
side of a
debate legitimately suspects illicit motives
on the part
of some
of the other
side and those who are genuinely expressing their views
on the other
side of the
debate fairly
consider their views to be disrespected as a result.
There has been a failure
of imagination (
on all
sides) about a
debate that tends to
consider the real experience
of people with legal problems only through their possible interaction with lawyers.