What they saw was that subjects in this «consider the opposite» study were able to overcome their biases and openly
consider other points of view.
Each lesson provides approaches that help your students understand empathy and how to
consider other points of view that may differ from their own.
Consider other points of view, make constructive suggestions and help the Board make decisions which benefit the mission, goals and objectives of the Association.
It's one thing to
consider other points of view but God doesn't want us to fill our heads with negativity.
So the next time you see a short flight available on ba.com for that terrific 4,500 Avios redemption price, don't book it without first checking the cash fare and
considering other points in your collection.
Not exact matches
The
point is for women to easily share their insights with
others who may be
considering dating those guys.
Other pain
points included drug pricing and how approving more generics may affect costs (Gottlieb parried that question by noting the FDA doesn't have the authority to negotiate prices or
consider pricing when approving a drug) and his alleged softness on opioid drug makers due the aforementioned financial ties and pro-industry ideology (the nominee noted that he
considers opioid addiction and overdoses a public health crisis «on the order of Ebola and Zika»).
He went on to
point out that potential customers are not necessarily
considering just
other shoes when contemplating a purchase, but a wide range of
other options.
Felix Salmon, for instance,
points out that Fortune's editorial staff
considered twelve
other candidates including Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim, and Martha Stewart before naming Steve Jobs the best CEO of the decade in November 2009.
While the costs of your mortgage definitely make up the biggest part of your monthly expenses on a condo, there are plenty of
other expenses that you need to
consider when you're deciding on an appropriate price
point.
In actuality, there is no one singular selling
point, nor should there be if Amazon — or for that matter, any
other company — is
considering it.
To get more mileage from the content you create, you might want to
consider repurposing it into
other formats at some
point.
Upgraded
Points, LLC uses reasonable efforts to maintain accurate information on the site — and prior to applying for any credit card offers found on UpgradedPoints.com, all visitors should review
other features of such credit cards including but not limited to interest rates, annual fees and transaction fees, and should determine the suitability of such credit cards
considering their own individual financial position.
There are also some practical
points to
consider; I would expect global regulators» attention to be focused on the more wild ICOs that pre-date the guidance, and ICOs which are quite transparently frauds (some ICOs are more honest than
others).
Other traders might
consider a stop - loss
point somewhere above the recent resistance level $ 12.45 a share for USO.
Using data gathered from competitor research is a popular approach, but
other strategies you may wish to
consider include typing your keyword into Google and then trawling through the results, using a directory such as DMOZ as a starting
point, or working through a target list of relevant newspaper, ezine, and magazine sites.
Have you
considered teh fact that your answer only applies to people who believe in Christianity, and ignores all the
other religions in this nation (and basically perfectly illustrates the
point the article is making).
Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the
other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief)
point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to
consider ANY possibility of hell at all.
There are dozens and dozens of
other organizations that are worthy of your support, too —
consider these six agencies a starting
point.
Further, I am always skeptical of people who contend to have a monopoly on the truth, while refusing to
consider other peoples
points of view.
Many people do not marry in a church, even more (billions) do not celebrate the birth of Jesus, probably even more do not cry out to any gods, or may to
other gods
other than (yours), and many people
consider life elsewhere in the universe because science and reason
points to that possibility.
When someone is accused of «cherry - picking» verses from the Bible, it means that they have a particular doctrine or idea they want to teach to
others, and rather than
considering «the whole counsel of God,» they pick a choose a few select verses from various books of the Bible which seems to prove their
point or present their case in the strongest possible way.
Such a «rational», scientific process would demand a fair hearing of both sides of any
point of view... but to only
consider one side and block out the
other is foolish...
And lest you think this post is about finger -
pointing, I have no doubt in my mind that if my own assumptions and prejudices go totally unchecked, if I never stop for a moment to
consider the
other side and wonder if I might be wrong, I too am capable of using the Bible to my own ends, of convincing myself that God is on my side.
To say it more simply and exactly, my starting
point is always to
consider myself in principle not more clever and more honest than
others.
I think the author
points out some interesting things that open - minded people might
consider when they think about their own beliefs and why they should care about what
other people do in their own homes.
Another friend made a good
point the
other day, reminding me that sexual sins should be
considered more serious because they cause more destruction.
Catholics and Protestants disagree with each
other on
points and on what is
considered divinely inspired books making up the Bible.
Steve, stated, «Catholics and Protestants disagree with each
other on
points and on what is
considered divinely inspired books making up the Bible.»
The
point is,
considering their religions SHOULD be as pointless as that, but it isn't because some Americans actually believe their religion makes a difference because they think THEIR God is real, but that
other guy's isn't.
We have been taught to pray in the way which you have
pointed out, yet never once
considering the
other side has been praying the same way.
Here we have the interesting notion fairly and squarely presented to us, of there being elements of the universe which may make no rational whole in conjunction with the
other elements, and which, from the
point of view of any system which those
other elements make up, can only be
considered so much irrelevance and accident — so much «dirt,» as it were, and matter out of place.
Many will choose to stop reading here because they've figured out where I'm going but that shows the unwillingness to
consider any
other option, which is the same fault that you complain about; I ask that you take just a moment to
consider my
point of view.
To set the stage for
considering religion from a cosmological
point of view, Whitehead writes, «The most general formulation of the religious problem is the question whether the process of the temporal world passes into the formation of
other actualities, bound together in an order in which novelty does not mean loss.»
One way of getting at the
point is by
considering the celibate man or woman whose specific vocation is not to act genitally but to redirect the sexual drive, desire, and equipment for
other ends that are taken as good for that particular person.
The
point is not to ignore or devalue facts in a specific instance, but to recognize that, in all relationships, there are
other issues to also
consider.
As we
pointed out in Chapter 8, we can
consider each
other to be wrong without necessarily impugning the validity of the
other's religious beliefs, if their beliefs lead to right relation with God and people.
Considering that achieving the greatest good for the greatest number is kind of the
point of democracy and any
other coercive form of government, I guess you can say that Rand is opposed to the Republic as well, although in public she essentially gutted her own philosophy and said that she was only opposed to people being allowed to vote on matters of private enterprise.
But there is one
other point to
consider.
What is fundamental is the willingness to
consider each
other's
point of view; this willingness is rooted in a degree of mutual respect.
At each stage in the process of counting, through a serial intuitive enumeration, I am able to
consider each element of the totality noticed up to that
point as a separate and specific dot, and then each dot must be seen as one so noticed in relation to the
others so noticed.
While the vast majority of these doctrinal statements were created primarily for the purpose of defining one group's distinctive beliefs without condemning those who believe differently, nearly every statement contains
points that are
considered «non-negotiable» and which will cause churches to separate from
others who believe differently, and even condemn these
other groups as «unsaved.»
Those whose interest in the religions of Asia has been aroused to the
point that they want to
consider some of the comparative problems raised by the study of religions
other than one's own will find thoughtful and searching discussions in two books recently published: World Religions and World Community, by Robert Lawson Slater, and The Meaning and End of Religion, by Wilfred Cantwell Smith.
Whether or nor particular quanta
considered in this kind of an explanation are capable of further analysis, or yet
other sorts of forces (and quanta) are subsequently discovered, is not, after all, the most significant
point.
Then there are all of your fantastic comments and emails which have raised
other great questions and
points which I need to
consider...
Fianlly
consider respecting the
other point of view I didn't say agreeing just respecting.
(
point to
consider, those red states that are screaming about not wanting to have to share the cost of
other peoples healthcare... wait for it... have by far the highest rates of obesity)
In the first instance, Whitehead himself had thoroughly
considered other, more ad hoc plausible starting
points for his program.
On the
other hand, by taking account in Critique et Religion of previous attempts at synthesis, he allows for the
point about what may already be
considered as dismissed and for the elimination of a certain number of false ideas which would compromise the research to which his books invite us.
One can not but feel that on this as on many
other points the theologians
considered the doctrine of original sin as a very present help in trouble.