Sentences with phrase «consider other sides»

You reach the point when your thinking brain — the part that can take in gray areas, consider other sides, stay aware of the real state of affairs — is shut out.

Yet when we surround ourselves with like - minded people or only hear similar complaints, it's hard to ever consider the other side.

Consider the other side of the equation, the Millennials» characteristic social form.

And lest you think this post is about finger - pointing, I have no doubt in my mind that if my own assumptions and prejudices go totally unchecked, if I never stop for a moment to consider the other side and wonder if I might be wrong, I too am capable of using the Bible to my own ends, of convincing myself that God is on my side.

We have been taught to pray in the way which you have pointed out, yet never once considering the other side has been praying the same way.

Both sides were considering the other side a direct threat to their existence.

Maybe it would be worthwhile considering the other side as well, to try to get a more objective statement, on a very sensitive question.

January 19 The Other Side It is naturally dangerous to say that one film or the other is necessarily «important» or «essential», but I'd have relatively few qualms considering The Other Side as befitting both of these adjectives.

However — Finally, once the point is made, analysed and supported, it's important to consider the other side of an argument.

Congress needs to address this situation by considering the other side of the equation.

But before you go running to the bank, consider the other side of the coin.

Let's consider the other side of the argument:

i hate to think that people are influenced by people like you who are so horribly biased that they resort to name - calling, and will obviously never consider the other side

Now consider the other side.

Not exact matches

«We consider what everyone needs to be profitable, looking at the other side of the fence: «What do you need?

It means deciding what one believes not by conforming to fashionable opinions, but by taking the trouble to learn and honestly consider the strongest arguments to be advanced on both or all sides of questions — including arguments for positions that others revile and want to stigmatize and against positions others seek to immunize from critical scrutiny.»

For start - ups where weekly revenue is balanced with sales, product development, delivery, staffing, accounting, and other «side gigs» to finance a bootstrapped environment, new partners rarely have time to consider what might go wrong.

That follows other reports that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz or media mogul Oprah Winfrey could consider making bids for president, all of them most likely on the Democratic side.

On the negative side, people who work for autocratic managers often feel as though their contributions are not valued by the organization and decisions often don't consider how it will affect employees other than the manager.

There are other factors to consider (the side benefits of federal consolidation loans for example), and there are additional strategies not covered in this scenario that some borrowers may be able to utilize.

And, of course, on the other side, you should also be practicing good listening as you fairly consider all of the input offered by your mentor, even when it may not be what you want to hear.

One side note is important to consider here: sometimes building owners will give a restaurant with a strong brand below market rent to entice other tenants to lease space in their building.

But what's especially interesting about the bake off this time around are the other family members being considered: A.G.'s cousins Sam Dolnick and David Perpich, both of whom are also very well liked and respected in the newsroom and on the business side.

You must force yourself to consider arguments on the other side» Charlie Munger

A restaurant or retailer, however, would need to seriously consider the name that will appear on the side of their building, on print ads, and on other marketing materials — things that can not be easily altered.

There are two sides to that coin Lawrence... non-religious people are tired of people cramming their religion down their throats as if it is okay for them to tought it around in other people's faces because their God says they are saved from something... It used to be considered decent to not talk about religion and politics, but people just have to put one or the other, or both in your face now - a-days.

I guess I have never considered late Bronze Age regional Jewish mythology relevant to a country founded more than 1776 years later on the other side of the planet.

The goals and methods of genetic science must be considered in a continual, complex, many - sided con - versation among Christians and others who take the challenge seriously.

I consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writers.

What difference does it make if there is something you might consider a god on the other side of the universe?

Such a «rational», scientific process would demand a fair hearing of both sides of any point of view... but to only consider one side and block out the other is foolish...

If you think that a group led prayer is not harmful, you haven't considered it from the other side.

The latter is a tangled problem at best, but it is clear that among the important founders of the process perspective — specifically I mean James, Peirce, Bergson, Whitehead, Dewey, and Hartshorne — it is Hartshorne's work which comes closest to being a kind of personalism.1 Whitehead explicitly sets aside the personalist perspective in Religion in the Making, considering its claims beyond the possibility of being established.2 On the other side, a number of personalists have been sympathetic to process thought, and Brightman is surely principal among them.3 Here I will not investigate the question of whether personalism in general, or even the idealistic type, is reconcilable with process thought.

His story, and that of other Chinese Indonesian Christians, has much to teach us as we consider whether or not to embrace Rod Dreher's Benedict Option (retreat in order to rebuild), or instead seek positive solutions to social problems in an America that judges us on the wrong side of history.

On a side note, it's odd to see people arguing over religion considering all of the other problems in America.

For if, realistically considered, each «mind» to be stocked with information is as separate from every other one as one Kansas silo waiting to be stocked with grain is from one other in a rail - side row, contact and conversation between students can only be regarded as inefficient — as «noise» in both the ordinary and the technical sense.

Considering christian propaganda oppression is everywhere you look, I think the emerging atheists should get a chance to see the other side of the coin.

At the time I considered myself «the man» because I had adorned my extraordinarily large forehead with an overly gelled middle parting in which the strands either side curled up towards each other.

Even a face - to - face dialogue gives way to a side - by - side conversation, where scholars of different faiths no longer confront each other but collaborate in jointly confronting the universe, and consider together the problems in which all of them are involved.

According to him, the error lies in assuming that one is dealing with the same set of possible spin - measurement results for the particles coming out one side of the apparatus described no matter what orientation one considers for the spin - measuring device (s) on the other side of the apparatus.

From Joshua: Do you ever feel like your personal struggles and decisions are being used as a tool by those on one side or the other in the debates concerning same sex relationships, and if so, what would you want those people using your decisions to advance their causes to know or consider?

We encourage you to take an honest look at the research presented on this website, and consider the «other side» of the story, whether it be coconut oil, saturated fats, cholesterol, or the new vegetable oils!

Sometimes a salad just needs a kick of protein to be considered a main course; other times a fried egg can be the difference between ordering takeout or recycling the side dish you made last night.

I think Olivier's form will mean that Arsene Wenger will fail to consider leaving him out of the side this week, but I cant help but feel that Chelsea will be too comfortable defending against his style of play, while Alexis has proven to be able to pressure centre - backs like no other.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.

Their name was picked out and they were automatically assigned into the only group left on the other half of the draw to us, and got what has to be considered the weakest side in pot one, CSKA Moscow.

Considering his attributes and qualities it suits Arsenal where the team can actually have Sanchez on one side and Henrik on the other.

If I was Barkley that is where I'd consider moving, those or Liverpool (doubtful), the other top sides would use him as a bit part player.

Antonio Conte's side may still consider other options before moving for Menez, but Liverpool could be forced to look elsewhere if this big name attempts to compete with them in the transfer market.