Sentences with phrase «consider prejudicial»

There is no support for the conclusion that the state court failed to take into account the totality of the available mitigating evidence and to consider the prejudicial impact of counsel's actions.

We do not prejudice anyone for their sexual preference, their ethnicity or any other factors that we consider prejudicial towards ones sexual orientation.

Violations of the Code of Ethics shall be considered prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.

First, the court declined to address an errant statement made by the plaintiff's counsel during closing arguments that the defendants considered prejudicial.

It was determined that the unredacted documents were considered prejudicial to the plaintiff and they were barred by the pretrial motion.

Not exact matches

He said despite his escape of series of assassination attempt and arrest over his hue and cry on the maladministration in K ogi, he was detained and charged to court by the State Government and yet wanted to take his life, an act which he considered as prejudicial and extra judicial

Vance's statements come the day after de Blasio attorney Laurence Laufer sent a letter to the state board, characterizing its inability to keep the referral confidential as a «complete dereliction of duty» that, should the leak have come from the board itself, could be considered «highly prejudicial and perhaps politically motivated act.»

IF THE BOARD CONSIDERS THAT THE CHARGES DO NOT ALLEGE CONDUCT WHICH WOULD BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CLUB OR OF THE BREED IT MAY REFUSE TO ENTERTAIN JURISDICTION.

If a majority of the Board considers that the charges, if proved, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the Breed, the Board shall order a hearing committee of not less than three and not more than nine members of the Club having no direct personal involvement in the issues to be heard, and shall fix a date and time for such hearing at a place within the region where the defendant resides.

The Board shall first (within 20 days) consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed.

If a majority of the Board does not consider that the actions alleged in the charges, if proved, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed, a hearing shall not be ordered, and the deposit shall be returned.

If a majority of the Board does not consider that the actions alleged in the charges, if proved, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed, a hearing shall not be ordered.

The Board Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

The Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Society or of the breed, it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

The Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed.

The Recording Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the club or the breed.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct, which would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Club of the breed, it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

the board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the club.

The Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the board or present them at a board meeting, and the board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the club.

If the board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interests of the club, it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or of the breed it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

The Recording Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the Breed.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the Breed, it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

The Corresponding Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed, it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

If the Board considers that the charges do not allege conduct which would be prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or of the breed, it may refuse to entertain jurisdiction.

The Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.

The Court then considered whether this removal of these links could be justified on the basis that the information they contained may be prejudicial to the data subject or that he may simply wish it to be forgotten.

In its application concerning the case at hand, Slovakia stipulates that the Member States» commitments under EU migration policy should be executed «in a spirit of solidarity» which it considers to be «less prejudicial» to state sovereignty than the duty of solidarity governing the application of the contested EU relocation decision (para. 231 of the Judgment).

In considering the factors relevant to the exercise of the court's discretion, under s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA1980), to extend the limitation period beyond that specified in LA 1980, s 11 what matters most is not the length of the delay itself, but the reasons for that delay and its potentially prejudicial effect; moreover, it may be reasonable to delay issuing proceedings on account of the defendant's impecuniosity.

However, the prejudicial nature of such evidence must be carefully considered against its probative value.

[17] I have considered whether the probative value of the photographs in this case is outweighed by their prejudicial effect on the jury's assessment.

The arbitration tribunal may allow a party to amend or supplement its claim or counterclaim or defence during the course of the arbitration, unless the arbitration tribunal considers the delay in amending or supplementing the claim to be prejudicial to another party or considers that the amendment or supplement goes beyond the terms of the arbitration agreement.

The trial judge still must consider whether the expert's evidence would be prejudicial.

In considering the attitude of the newspapers in general, Findlay believes the level of coverage can be dangerously prejudicial, particularly before the point of any arrest.

The conduct that has been held to be unfairly prejudicial is enumerated (though this is not an exhaustive list) and the remedies considered.

The factors to be considered by the court include: first, to what extent a judgment rendered in the person's absence might be prejudicial to the person or those already parties; second, the extent to which, by protective provisions in the judgment, by the shaping of relief, or other measures, the prejudice can be lessened or avoided; third, whether a judgment rendered in the person's absence will be adequate; fourth, whether the plaintiff will have an adequate remedy if the action is dismissed for nonjoinder.

When deciding whether to extend time for bringing a claim for judicial review, the court should start by considering to what extent there are good reasons for extending time and, if there is good reason, to what extent relief would be likely to cause hardship, would be prejudicial, or would be detrimental to good administration.

The basis is anything that could be considered as invasive, prejudicial or has no bearing on the applicant's ability to trade in real estate.