This change allows design professionals to
consider weight requirements for a project when making decisions about what rooflite soil product to use.
Not exact matches
Since these loans come with even greater responsibility than federal student loans (read: more stringent repayment
requirements), it's important to know the
weight of the debt you're
considering taking on.
If a dog or cat drops 10 % of body
weight and is not consuming its resting energy
requirement for 3 - 5 days, then feeding tube placement must be
considered.
Though some states have described this
requirement as a
requirement of «physical injury,» physical effects that have been
considered to fulfill the
requirement include loss of appetite, loss of
weight, nightmares, extreme nervousness, and extreme irritability.
Fact - sensitive as it may be, the level of disclosure required is quite clearly a question of law to be decided ultimately by the court: any suggestion in R v Airport Co-ordination Ltd, ex parte Aravco [1999] EuLR 939 (in particular, at 949G - H) that the
requirements of fair consultation was a matter of discretion for the decision - maker was disavowed, albeit that the decision - maker's
considered view may carry some
weight with the court: Eisai [32].
It is useful to quote key observations by Stadlen J [at paras 126 - 129]: «In my view, notwithstanding the absence in the FTPP proceedings of some of the statutory and non-statutory safeguards which apply to criminal proceedings... [I] n deciding whether it would be fair to admit the hearsay evidence, the
requirements both of Article 6 and of the common law obliged the FTPP to take into account the absence of all those [safeguards]... [I] n my judgment, no reasonable panel in the position of the FTPP could have reasonably concluded that there were factors outweighing the powerful factors pointing against the admission of the hearsay evidence... The means by which the claimant can challenge the hearsay evidence are... not in my judgment capable of outweighing those factors... The reality would appear to be that the factor which the FTPP
considered decisive in favour of admitting the hearsay evidence was the serious nature of the allegations against the claimant coupled with the public interest in investigating such allegations and the FTPP's duty to protect the public interest in protecting patients, maintaining public confidence in the profession and declaring and upholding proper standards of behaviour... However, that factor on its own does not in my view diminish the
weight which must be attached to the procedural safeguards to which a person accused of such allegations is entitled both at common law and under Article 6... The more serious the allegation, the greater the importance of ensuring that the accused doctor is afforded fair and proper procedural safeguards.