Sentences with phrase «considered as warm up»

So that can be considered as warm up and she will join to the game.

Not exact matches

Based on the results of this study the researchers suggest that sprint athletes should consider implementing a shorter as well as less strenuous warm up for improved performance.

A lot of physiologists and coaches consider that a long warm up offers an increased anaerobic metabolism, an acceleration of oxygen uptake kinetics, an increase in muscle temperature, and a process known as postactivation potentiation of the muscles.

Some people consider warm ups as part of pre workouts, while others say it is part of the workout routine.

When are you are ready to begin warming up with the longer strides, you may want to consider warming up the arm muscles as shown in the above video simultaneously.

If I do classes where they start and stop alot, you have the odd 5 minutes of team grouping or info explaining, you have a warm up which starts mega slow, you have a cool down which is something akin to walking, do you consider all these breaks and slow downs as well?

I had never seriously considered New Orleans as a must - visit location, but I've warmed up to The Big Easy after doing some trip research this week.

When the seasons change, switching up your skincare regimen and rethinking your makeup is a must, but a hair color update is also worth considering, especially as the weather warms.

Still, in styling terms it's a breath of fresh air in the maker's otherwise uniform range, and in R - Line trim, as here, it could be considered a left - field alternative to some of the more conventional warmed - up offerings in the family hatchback segment - not least the equivalently - sized Golf.

The team, meanwhile, has also ruled out running the FIA World Endurance Championship round at Spa - Francorchamps, as a warm - up race to Le Mans, as had been originally considered.

Known as the longest bar in the world, here you can find numerous restaurants, cafes, and pubs, where Christmas market visitors can warm up before considering where to explore next.

As to taking words too literally, consider a newspaper article headlined «Global Warming Fears Up Down Under.»

As one metric, simply consider that Watts Up With That, arguably the most popular blog tracked by people rejecting the dominant scientific view of global warming, did not exist when the climate panel's assessments were rolled out in 2007 yet now, according to its creator, Anthony Watts, has topped 36 million page views.

Before allowing the temperature to respond, we can consider the forcing at the tropopause (TRPP) and at TOA, both reductions in net upward fluxes (though at TOA, the net upward LW flux is simply the OLR); my point is that even without direct solar heating above the tropopause, the forcing at TOA can be less than the forcing at TRPP (as explained in detail for CO2 in my 348, but in general, it is possible to bring the net upward flux at TRPP toward zero but even with saturation at TOA, the nonzero skin temperature requires some nonzero net upward flux to remain — now it just depends on what the net fluxes were before we made the changes, and whether the proportionality of forcings at TRPP and TOA is similar if the effect has not approached saturation at TRPP); the forcing at TRPP is the forcing on the surface + troposphere, which they must warm up to balance, while the forcing difference between TOA and TRPP is the forcing on the stratosphere; if the forcing at TRPP is larger than at TOA, the stratosphere must cool, reducing outward fluxes from the stratosphere by the same total amount as the difference in forcings between TRPP and TOA.

Consider the possibility that not just millions, but billions face disastrous consequences from the likes of (including but not limited to): Sandy (and other hybrid and out - of - season storms enhanced by the earth's circulatory eccentricities and warmer oceans); the drought in progress; wildfires; floods (just last week, Argentina had 16 inches of rain in 2 hours *); derechos; increased cold and snow in the north as the Arctic melts and cracks up, breaking up the Arctic circulation and sending cold out of what was previously largely a contained system, and losing its own consistent cold, seriously interfering with the Jet Stream, pollution of multiple kinds such as in China, the increase of algae and the like in our oceans as they heat, and food and water shortages.

The point isn't a «perpetual increase in atmospheric pressure» — that's a misnomer — if you consider the MASS of the atmosphere that is continuously «pumped» from cold air to hot air to cold air again, high up in the atmosphere — that creates «potential energy» from the kinetic energy of the convection — adiabatic expansion of the atmosphere is the result — the adiabatic compression occurs on the return trip of the previously warmed (from radiative energy) air as it completes the «cycle» as it comes back down!

As the world gears up for a crucial climate summit in Paris this December, a few facts about global warming are worth considering.

Considering there were 500 papers supporting a skeptical position on global warming alarm published in scientific journals during 2016, perhaps the publication of wake - up - call, borderline - iconoclastic scientific papers such as this will become more and more commonplace in the near future.

Having worked in the coal industry as a geologist and mining engineer, I have considered some of those massive, exceptionally deep coal seams (some in the Powder River Basin get up to 80 feet thick) and I wonder how warm and luxurious it would have to be to support plantlife that would accumulate such massive amounts of carbon.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Show your numbers; if you don't consider the atmosphere is a blackbody, which is not, then make the atmosphere warms up the surface as if it was a more efficient primary source of energy than the Sun.