Sentences with phrase «considered at a court hearing»

Not exact matches

At a hearing on Thursday in state court in Manhattan, New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos will consider whether to permit the rare proceeding to go forward, potentially allowing the Club — whose tweedy Manhattan headquarters has, over the years, served the likes of Sir Ernest Shackleton, President Teddy Roosevelt, and Jacques Cousteau — to stop Diageo's (DEO) mighty Johnnie Walker brand from marketing its new Explorers» Club Colleccourt in Manhattan, New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos will consider whether to permit the rare proceeding to go forward, potentially allowing the Club — whose tweedy Manhattan headquarters has, over the years, served the likes of Sir Ernest Shackleton, President Teddy Roosevelt, and Jacques Cousteau — to stop Diageo's (DEO) mighty Johnnie Walker brand from marketing its new Explorers» Club CollecCourt Justice Charles Ramos will consider whether to permit the rare proceeding to go forward, potentially allowing the Club — whose tweedy Manhattan headquarters has, over the years, served the likes of Sir Ernest Shackleton, President Teddy Roosevelt, and Jacques Cousteau — to stop Diageo's (DEO) mighty Johnnie Walker brand from marketing its new Explorers» Club Collection.

The Attorney General noted that in a considered judgment at the resumed hearing of the case on Monday, April 30, 2018, the Hon. Justice Oni Esan of the Oyo State High Court dismissed the claimant's case.

The suspension of the bylaw's problematic sections is temporary, until a hearing can be held on the merits, at which time the Superior Court will consider the legality of these very sections.

At the AAT hearing in Adelaide, the impacts of wind farm noise were considered by a senior Federal Court judge; the most thorough medial and scientific inquiry on the subject matter conducted in Australia to date.

If the Government prevails in the court case, testimony on the climate effects of oil pipelines will be considered inadmissible at NEB hearings.

Bensaid v UK The only other case in which the court has considered a challenge to expulsion on health grounds at a full hearing is Bensaid v UK (App No 44599 / 98)[2001] ECHR 44599 / 98.

The non-party must be given an opportunity to attend a hearing at which the Court will consider the matter further.

The majority decision, supported by four of the seven judges who heard the case at the SCC, said lower courts must consider, among other things, the harm that could come if Muslim women who wear the niqab feel discouraged from reporting offenses.

The court reached its decision after considering newly - discovered evidence of police misconduct obtained through the use of digital forensic technology not available at the time of trial and holding several days of evidentiary hearings.

If you think that the adjudicator failed to consider important evidence that your lawyer presented at the hearing, you may now have a remedy in BC Supreme Court.

This explanation helps me understand a bit better why a majority of the Fourth Circuit believes that «announcing — not imposing — a non-guidelines sentence at the time of sentencing will serve judicial economy,» even though the court recognizes that the «announcement of a non-guidelines sentence may require the district court to consider issues not generally pertinent in guidelines sentencing, thereby requiring the investment of additional time at the sentencing hearing.»

Hearings have been set for June 13, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in British Columbia, June 20, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in Ontario and June 22, 2012 at 9:30 am in Quebec for the Courts to consider approval of the Elpida settlement.

The full appeal hearing took place on 17 January 2017 at the Court of Appeal in London, which ruled that whilst the judgment could have explained in greater detail what information could have been provided to the purchaser, the judge has considered what an appropriate summary was in the original judgment.

The Court also considered that steps should be taken to make parties aware that «hearing fees will not obstruct their pursuit of justice if they can not afford them» (at paragraph 39).

Thus, before considering the substantive issues as to whether the districts are unlawful, the Court must consider whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case at all.

Unless local conditions make it impracticable, each district court shall establish regular times and places, at intervals sufficiently frequent for the prompt dispatch of business, at which motions requiring notice and hearing may be heard and disposed of; but the judge at any time or place and on such notice, if any, as the judge considers reasonable may make orders for the advancement, conduct, and hearing of actions.

At the hearing on October 14, the Court will consider class members» objections to the proposed Settlement, including class counsel fees.

Justice Strickland, in 0871768 B.C. Ltd. v. Aestival (Vessel), 2014 FC 1047, considered whether a responding party could take the position at a hearing that the moving party had not met its burden on the motion but also submit that if the court found the burden was met, the respondent be permitted to file responding evidence later.

That transcript will be read by the judge at the hearing, and will be considered in the same manner as live court testimony.

At this first hearing, the court will also consider the immediate arrangements for the child, like where the child will live and who will have contact with them during the court case.

The court considers whether a final hearing is needed at all or whether a final decision can be made in a fair way at the IRH.

(3) The compensation committee may, at any point during a hearing under subsection (1)(a), decline to make the determination or assessment, or both, on the basis that it considers the matter would more effectively be dealt with by a court proceeding.