Sentences with phrase «considered court action against»

The Millennium Excellence Foundation, the organization that hosted the 2017 Ghana Expatriates Business Awards, has said it is considering a court action against some two minority Members of Parliament over the cash - for - seat allegations.

In a related development, the Millennium Excellence Foundation, the organization that hosted the awards, has said it is considering a court action against two minority Members of Parliament over the cash - for - seat allegations.

Not exact matches

I consider it immoral that Evans Amankwah and Abigail Elom Mensah who were reported on the internet on the evening of 8th August 2017 to have petitioned on 7th August 2017 to the General Secretary of the National Democratic Congress under Article 45 of the NDC Constitution to take disciplinary action against, me, Martin A. B. K Amidu pursuant to Article 47 thereof choose to publish their petition to the press to court cheap popularity in the interim.

Clive Romain, the NUT's senior solicitor, said the union would consider «simple court action» against schools which it believed to be «unlawfully» creating new grammars and so had written to the schools asking for information about how their grammar streams are run.

Having first clarified (paras 36 and 38) that Article 16 EEA on commercial monopolies (the equivalent of Article 37 TFEU), rather than Article 11 EEA (the equivalent of Article 34 TFEU), was applicable, the Court then had to decide whether ÁTVR's actions could be considered as discriminating against foreign producers or importers.

The national court therefore has its own sphere of discretion when examining the action against the defendant, and the Commission can not be considered as the judge and the party in its own cause.

In fact, one of the plaintiffs in Attis took such steps by commencing an action (prior to the motion underlying the appeal) in negligence against plaintiffs» counsel for damages of $ 250,000 — a factor that was considered by the Court in allowing the appeal.

Except in cases affecting the personal status of the plaintiff, and cases in which that mode of service may be considered to have been assented to in advance, as hereinafter mentioned, the substituted service of process by publication, allowed by the law of Oregon and by similar laws in other States, where actions are brought against non-residents, is effectual only where, in connection with process against the person for commencing the action, property in the State is brought under the control of the court, and subjected to its disposition by process adapted to that purpose, or where the judgment is sought as a means of reaching such property or affecting some interest therein; in other words, where the action is in the nature of a proceeding in rem.

From today, it will be compulsory for anybody taking legal action against their former partner to have first considered family mediation before being allowed to file papers at court.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repCourt of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repcourt against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

Reports claimed barristers and solicitors were considering the unprecedented step of forming a union to start industrial action against the Courts Service.

In Sprunk v. Prisma LLC (August 23, 2017), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) considered whether a defendant in a putative class action can waive its right to compel arbitration against absent class members by deciding not to seek arbitration against the named plaintiff.

In the course of the proceedings the Court rejected applications to amend claims against PDV Marina so as to introduce claims in restitution and misrepresentation and considered the ingredients of the relevant causes of action (see [2015] EWHC 1986 (Comm)-RRB-.

In Abbasi, for example, the Court of Appeal considered that there was no obligation, as a matter of customary international law, for the state to take diplomatic action against the arbitrary detention of (even) a British citizen by US authorities at Guantanamo Bay.

In VTB Capital PLC v. Universal Telecom Management, the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal considered whether it had the power to grant a Mareva injunction over defendants against whom no substantive cause of action is asserted («non-cause-of-action-defendants» or «NCADs») when the cause of action defendant is beyond the jurisdiction of the cCourt of Appeal considered whether it had the power to grant a Mareva injunction over defendants against whom no substantive cause of action is asserted («non-cause-of-action-defendants» or «NCADs») when the cause of action defendant is beyond the jurisdiction of the courtcourt.

Apple's legal battle against accusations that it intentionally slows down older iPhones to incentivize customers to upgrade to newer models will likely take place in one courtroom near the company's headquarters in California.The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has disclosed that it will consider consolidating dozens of iPhone performance - related complaints filed against Apple during a hearing scheduled for Thursday, March 29 in Atlanta, Georgia, as is routine for similar cases filed across multiple states.Apple currently faces 59 putative class actions across 16 district courts in the United States.

The Austrian Supreme Court will consider whether a suit against Facebook Ireland can proceed as a class action.

The court granted NAR's motion for summary judgment, finding that there was nothing unlawful about NAR supporting and sharing information with MLSs that were considering legal action against AHRN.

A federal appellate court has considered whether to reinstate a possible class action lawsuit against a vendor that had allegedly promised its appraiser clients that information submitted through its system would be confidential but the vendor actually collected the information and offered it for resale.

A Massachusetts appellate court has considered a potential class action lawsuit brought against a broker by former salespeople alleging that they were misclassified as independent contractors.

A federal court has considered how the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's («HUD») recent clarification of its 1999 Statement of Policy affects a class - action lawsuit brought against a lender alleging RESPA violations for its practice of making yield - spread payments to mortgage brokers.

A Minnesota federal court has considered whether a large brokerage firm could bring a trademark infringement action against another brokerage firm who used the large brokerage firm's name as an Internet search term to drive traffic to its website.

A New York appellate court has considered the sanctions against a licensee and her broker for their actions in a transaction involving a variable commission rate.

The Court determined that the Act did not vary the traditional rules of vicarious liability (or, when an owner can be liable for the actions of its employees) and so directed the appellate court to consider the allegations against the Broker under the traditional principles of vicarious liabiCourt determined that the Act did not vary the traditional rules of vicarious liability (or, when an owner can be liable for the actions of its employees) and so directed the appellate court to consider the allegations against the Broker under the traditional principles of vicarious liabicourt to consider the allegations against the Broker under the traditional principles of vicarious liability.

A Wisconsin federal court has considered whether a multiple listing service participant could bring a class action lawsuit against a REALTOR ® association and its multiple listing service over the practice of requiring association membership for multiple listing service participation.

A California appellate court has considered whether a lower court properly dismissed a class action lawsuit filed against real estate brokerage firms over their collection of a «document preparation fee» in addition to their commission amount.

A South Carolina court has considered whether a seller's failure to provide a completed disclosure form to the buyer gave the buyer a cause of action against the seller and the real estate brokers.