Sentences with phrase «considered damaging their property»

But I'm pretty sure bringing your sheep or even letting your dog scare somebody else's sheep will be considered damaging their property.

Not exact matches

In addition, just consider the criteria which Mr. Allison uses to judge overall «success»: the absence of «major disorder» and «damage to property».

Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that physically affect an individual's property or person, no matter if the result of those actions is damaging, beneficial, or neutral to the owner, are considered violent or aggressive when they are against the owner's free will and interfere with his right to self - determination and the principle of self - ownership.

While many Americans consider the bomb that went off Saturday in New York City to be terrorism, some property owners who sustained damage have reason to shy away from that term when it comes to insurance.

Probably not, when you consider damage to the building, your property, other peoples» property, and the other losses that could arise from an event like that.

Yes, if a bathtub (or sink) overflows and damages a rental property or a tenant's personal property, the tenant might consider filing a renters insurance claim.

However, in order to ensure you're financially protected if involved in an accident, we recommend that you consider purchasing bodily liability coverage, property damage liability coverage, uninsured motorist coverage, personal injury protection, comprehensive coverage and collision coverage.

Liability insurance pays for costs related to injuries or property damage of other parties in an accident which you're considered responsible for.

If you were considered to be responsible for a situation like that, you'd be responsible for the damage to the building as well as the damage to property of other residents.

Basic dirt bike insurance policies include bodily injury and property damage liability coverage but there are a number of other optional coverages dirt bike owners should consider purchasing.

The damage to personal property from a burst pipe is likely to be considered a covered loss.

Often, the fire damage would be considered to extend to property that you're unable to safely or legally retrieve as a result of the fire.

Consider also the potential expenses of covering damage to someone else's property, and even medical bills that may arise when people are injured.

If this doesn't sound like much, it's not, especially considering that the average award in an auto liability case is $ 300,000, and the average property damage claim runs around $ 7,000.

If your state tends to see higher property damage costs, such as California or Louisiana, you should consider choosing GRC / ERC coverage for your homeowners insurance policy.

Umbrella coverage is considered extremely affordable by most people, given the excellent coverage you get for potentially astronomical property damage or bodily injury costs.

Anything the seller is committed to pay for can be considered a damage - title, survey, appraisal, property improvements or repairs done for the buyer, etc..

You may want to consider property damage to your boat, as well as liability claims if someone else is injured or has property damaged.

In fact, language in the state question allows virtually anyone to identify as a farmer if their activities have anything to do with animals; it essentially allows them to do whatever they want with the animals on their property, even if their practices would be considered inhumane by most Oklahomans» standards or cause a nuisance or even damage to other landowners.

Pets are considered a personal property in Oklahoma, so harm to a pet is damaging your property.

Consider Liability And Property Damage: All kennel plans should be reviewed by your insurance agent.

Unfortunately in most States a pet is considered property with damages limited to the price you paid for your dog.

There is also the matter of extensive damage to personal property and / or physical health due to fist - smashing and blood - boiling frustration to consider.

You'd be surprised by how many people consider trillions of dollars in property damage and millions of deaths to be a bad thing.

These synthetic hurricanes damage a portfolio of insured property according to an aggregate wind - damage function; damage from flooding is not considered here.

11 I am satisfied that, if a spouse can not show what portion of «compensation or injury or loss» relates to «lost income», the entire portion «settlement» or «damages» should not be excluded from what will be considered as «family property».

Any serious injury, deadly wound or property damage that takes place on a vessel in the open sea is considered an offshore accident.

Bluecrest and Express had therefore infringed a number of Technomed's intellectual property rights and, for the purposes of assessing damages, considered certain infringements flagrant.

The general rule of thumb, however, is that if there were any injuries that resulted from your car accident if the property damage exceeds 3000 dollars, or if a police report is involved, you may want to consider legal representation.

At that point, the question of your own carelessness or negligence will be considered, along with all the other factors that determine how much your claim is worth, such as the seriousness of your injuries, your past and future medical expenses, the extent of the property damage involved, etc.).

For a property owner to be considered negligent and liable for your damages, they must have acted unreasonably or without the prudence that a reasonable person would display in a similar situation.

While it may seem obvious that the at - fault party should accept financial responsibility for property damage, one may forget to consider the additional damages for which compensation is available, such as:

Insurers will consider damages that have money value, such as property damage, past medical costs, past wage loss, future medical costs, and future earning capacity.

These propositions are written for the Canadian lawyer whose knowledge of the relevant Canadian law is such that a Superior Court (or equivalent) judge would consider that lawyer competent to prosecute or defend an «ordinary» personal injury or property damage action.

The correct test where the claim has a real prospect of success is in three stages: to consider (i) whether the children had a seriously arguable case that they would succeed at trial in obtaining a proprietary interest in the property; and if so (ii) whether either or both parties would be adequately compensated by a damages award; and if not (iii) where the balance of convenience between the parties lies.

Even if a waiver or limitation of liability clause existed and was brought to the attention of the ski resort patron, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has further suggested that an injured plaintiff may be awarded damages for a kind of negligence that was not contemplated or considered «as part of the flavour» of the language printed on lift tickets and season passes, and posted elsewhere on ski resort property.

A part of the Litigation Section, the Tort Committee considers all matters relating to injury and damage to persons and property.

Consider that the average cost of a property damage claim was more than $ 3,000, and the average car accident victim is looking at nearly $ 20,000 in out - of - pocket expenses.

A property owner may be considered negligent, and therefore responsible for resulting damages, if they lack the following safety measures:

The judge wrote: «Since the parties were not able to point me to any case which had considered the issue of the existence of a duty of care by a volunteer in circumstances where the volunteer's act allegedly had caused, or contributed to, damage to the property of the person to whom he was volunteering his services, I conclude that the question of law raised by this case is a novel one, or at least one in which the case law has not been fully settled.»

A need for at least some greater deference or requirement to consider submissions from municipal authorities where civil insurrection is guaranteed to create local property damage?

We have to assume (1) that the appropiate people involved in the G20 are competent enough to have recognized the possibility of some level of «disturbance», of illegal conduct, that would result in property damage and (2) decided that maximum level of damage that they considered realistically possible was acceptable, on a cost - benefit analysis.

Liability insurance pays for costs related to injuries or property damage of other parties in an accident which you're considered responsible for.

If so chances are you should consider having business insurance that includes commercial general liability coverage (for claims against your business for bodily injury or property damage) and commercial property coverage (for your commercial property, contents, equipment, stock or office).

Liability coverage is legally required in Florida and pays for damage to the other driver's vehicle in the event that you are considered «at fault» in an accident under the property damage portion of your policy.

As a landlord, you should not only consider possible property damages, but also libel, slander and discrimination.

If you don't have collision coverage, you may want to consider a coverage type called uninsured motorist property - damage (UMPD).

You have to consider how you're going to replace your damaged property, your family's damaged property, and your neighbor's damaged property.

Consider a limit for your uninsured motorist property damage coverage that will be sufficient to cover your vehicle in the event that you are in an accident with a hit - and - run driver, a driver with no auto insurance coverage, or a driver who has some insurance coverage, but not enough to cover the damage to your vehicle.

Given the high cost of automobile replacement and / or repair, the purchase of property damage liability limits higher than the required minimum limit of $ 10,000 should be considered by insureds.