If zombies are animals, legally speaking, zombies would clearly be
considered dangerous animals.
Not exact matches
Yet Prof. Carlin finds the concept of
animal rights to be «extraordinarily
dangerous» and
considers those who promote this idea to be «enemies of the human race.»
First she collected facts, learning that treating the insane as
dangerous animals was regarded by most people as perfectly appropriate, since they were
considered depraved.
* Training / Behavior Modification hasn't resulted in an acceptable change in the dog; * There is significant risk and / or evidence that dog is going to seriously injure someone; aggression problems don't automatically mean the dog will injure someone or is
dangerous; I am referring to the idea that even with reasonable precautions, supervision, training and behavior modification, the dog is still going to get around all of that and hurt someone; * You have made a reasonable effort to work with the dog and situation; meaning you have PAID a professional to help you, worked the situation properly and diligently, and you still can't trust the dog to not hurt itself, another
animal or a person; * The dog is so
dangerous you can't place the dog with someone else; * The owner isn't willing, or is unable, or unqualified, to work with the dog any further, even with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you
consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to
consider another drug; * This dog is too
dangerous to work with.
Owners of
dangerous dogs could face dramatically higher fines and be required to maintain up to $ 1 million in homeowners insurance under proposals the Brevard County Commission will
consider today.Spurred by recent dog attacks that nearly killed a woman and injured a child, commissioners asked
animal experts to propose new fines and help toughen the county's
animal control ordinance.The proposed fee increases target all irresponsible pet owners, from those who fail to vaccinate their pets to owners whose dogs are involved in severe attacks.
Animal fats are more biologically valuable for your dog than plant - based fats, so it would be better to see salmon oil listed before the canola oil but none of these plant oils are
considered dangerous for dogs.
Rabies quarantines in Tucson, AZ are not
considered «boarding
animals» but as potentially
dangerous and contagious.
The new ordinance outlines the types of behavior that are
considered dangerous and allows the city's
animal control officer to make declarations of
dangerous dogs based on behavior regardless of breed.
A «no - kill» shelter is an
animal shelter that does not euthanize adoptable
animals or when the shelter is full, reserving euthanasia for
animals who are terminally ill or
considered dangerous.
An
animal behaviour specialist will evaluate the dog to determine if it should be
considered potentially
dangerous, or
dangerous.
Animal Control may require any animal that exhibits dangerous behavior as defined in this Act to be fully restrained and prevented from contact with the public in any way pending review, or if considered by Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and animals, impounded by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
Animal Control may require any
animal that exhibits dangerous behavior as defined in this Act to be fully restrained and prevented from contact with the public in any way pending review, or if considered by Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and animals, impounded by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
animal that exhibits
dangerous behavior as defined in this Act to be fully restrained and prevented from contact with the public in any way pending review, or if
considered by
Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and animals, impounded by Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
Animal Control to be a significant threat to the safety of people and
animals, impounded by
Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is re
Animal Control, using whatever restraints and tranquilization is necessary, until a determination is reached.
We need to stop labeling exotic pets as
dangerous because it makes no sense and results in a grave injustice to exotic
animal owners whose
animals can not be
considered a public safety threat no matter how you look at it.
Consider consulting a positive reinforcement trainer or
animal behaviorist for situations that you feel are
dangerous or that you don't feel equipped to handle.
A «no - kill» shelter is an
animal shelter that does not kill healthy or treatable
animals even when the shelter is full, reserving euthanasia for terminally ill
animals or those
considered dangerous to public safety.
Pets involved in attacks on people or serious attacks on other
animals are sometimes
considered too
dangerous to hold or handle and might be ordered to be euthanized by a county official, veterinarian or by CCHS.
Breeders should not be breeding
animals with this problem, as it is
considered to be congenital and often requires costly and
dangerous surgery to correct.
Unfortunately, it also happens to be one of the more
dangerous contaminants, as it's
considered zoonotic (meaning it can be transferred from
animals to humans).
On one end of the spectrum, any
animal might be
considered adoptable if it can be adopted, even if it in fact
dangerous or irredeemably suffering.
These
animals are
considered inherently
dangerous, so many shelters do not want the liability of adopting them out and they end up being euthanized.
Small domestic
animals that are not
considered dangerous and do not pose an imminent threat to humans or
animals, can only be put to death by use of a «commercially available injectable euthanasia solution».
A dog is
considered dangerous if it attacks and injures a person, pet or farm
animal without justification, or if it «behaves in a manner which a reasonable person would believe poses a serious and unjustified imminent threat of serious physical injury or death» to a person, pet or farm
animal.
The owner or «lawful custodian» of a
dangerous dog is
considered strictly liable for any medical costs resulting from an injury the
animal causes to a person, pet, farm
animal or domestic
animal.