I'm wondering whether a royal commission report would be
considered grey literature?
In science and technology a variety of document types have traditionally been
considered grey literature.
Not exact matches
To make things worse, NO book or report published by a genuine publishing agency is actually
considered «
grey»
literature, regardless of whether there is any peer review or not -LRB-!).
Considering the new scrutiny that
grey literature is receiving — and should receive reports like those from the IPCC should cite the original science — undoubtedly these will be corrected in the next assessment report.
Judy will recognize that these documents are often
considered «
grey literature».
We have had previous postings and comments related to this topic on SLAW and I still think the concept of a Canadian wide
grey literature legal depository is worth
considering.