Sentences with phrase «considered judgments about»

All these practical questions need to be addressed when making all - things - considered judgments about the morality of war.

As so very often, we have picked a virtue (or quasi-virtue) that we like the sound of - in this case open - mindedness - and placed it on an artificial pedestal, abstracted from any context that might help us come to a considered judgment about its merits in individual circumstances.

Not exact matches

And while there is no legal requirement that underwriters like Mr. Thiel reveal their involvement to the opposing side or the jury, it is considered fair game for lawyers to ask questions about financial backing — something that Gawker Media did on Wednesday in court as part of its efforts to overturn the Hogan judgment.

Since, even now, when debates about the fact of global warming is largely over, no nation is considering taking the really drastic actions that might significantly reduce the catastrophes that lie ahead, it seems that we are all too likely to experience judgment for our collective sins.

We will look at much of this imagery in a later post when we consider the violence in the book of Revelation, but the imagery is only brought up here to show that when Jesus talks about the flood in Matthew 24, He likens it to a similar form of world - wide judgment that falls upon the earth at the end of days.

When we consider his pessimism about Americans» depth of belief, I am reminded of the words of Herberg's contemporary, Walter Reuther, who admitted that he was frightened to pass judgment «on the purity of one another's motives.»

If he knowingly commits a post-24 weeks abortion, based on such stringent life and health criteria, the doctor must certify his judgment about the threat in writing; acquire the concurrence of a second doctor in that judgment based on a «separate personal medical examination» of the woman; perform the abortion in a hospital; employ procedures designed to maximize the unborn child's chances to survive; and have a second physician present, ready to consider any surviving child his primary patient.

Considering that you perpetually misspell judgment, I doubt you have any idea what you are talking about.

It is also a considered judgment made real through longstanding argument and handed down assumptions about the way the world works and ought to work.

I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judgment, because there are many religious persons — some of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use of the distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential point of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered.

So it is that the final scene of a play about people many consider damned might be, in Barth's terms, a more profoundly Christian picture of judgment day than the one in the Heidelberg Catechism.

Please remember that this information, in the absence of a visit with a health care professional, must be considered as an educational service only and is not designed to replace a physician's independent judgment about the appropriateness or risks of a procedure for a given patient.

«To rely on these reports to make a public judgment call about a teacher is unfortunate, especially considering that the reports are derived solely from problematic state exams that were administered several years ago,» Logan said in a statement.

Once again, Blizzard unfurls a set of units in a set of missions that barely relate to the actual game (what does it say about me that I consider the skirmish and multiplayer the «actual game», but I'm not dedicated enough to make any sort of meaningful judgment about how the new units affect balance?).

This might be against my better judgment at this point, considering what company we're talking about, but I'm going to call BS on this rumor.

Its intent is to explore the many things that those who make art or who make judgments about art should think about when they consider art that seeks to be «contextual,» «site - specific,» or «place making».»

Still, as Foley's comments illustrate, they do consider some scenarios more likely than others, which means they are, at least implicitly, making judgments about the likely course of politics.

Science alone can not tell us what assumptions or concerns should be considered in making a judgment about what to do about potentially dangerous behavior.

The IPCC considers all the different ways of calculating climate sensitivity, without making a value judgment about which is best.

-- Dr. Andrew E. Dessler, Professor of Atmospheric Science at Texas A&M: «If you consider all of the data, my judgment is that the IPCC's canonical range gives about the right probability distribution: 2 - 4.5 °C is the likely range, with values below 1.5 °C being very unlikely.»

In the real world, if someone purports to be an expert, they tell you that they have special knowledge of a subject, that you should rely on their judgment that certain claims are true, and they turn out to have no clue whatsoever about said claims, that person is no longer considered reliable or trustworthy.

Generally, considering that technological applications of scientific models, developed to reduce uncertainty about real - world risks, have been widely successful for making life safer and more comfortable for an increasing fraction of the world population, why is there so little trust in the judgments of scientists who generate and test such models?

Considering what a mess the Monday testimony and lawyer argument on the effect of the new claim construction was (because, frankly, both parties had previously hedged their bets as they didn't know what the appeals court would do), the jury is probably now very confused about it (and Judge Koh did the right thing by denying both parties» motions for judgment as a matter of law since there are reasonable arguments for and against infringement, for and against validity).

The Court of Appeal held that Warkentin, J., in granting summary judgment to the second lawyer, erred in failing to consider whether he had owed the plaintiffs a duty to advise them about the limitation period for suing the first lawyer, even though the written retainer between the plaintiffs and the second lawyer was restricted to an assessment of the first lawyer's account.

I try to give each artist / band a fair listen, but considering the volume of submissions I receive on any given day, I have to make judgments about the music very quickly.

The recent judgment of HHJ Paul Matthews in Lewis v Tamplin provides cause to consider what rights beneficiaries under a trust have to demand information about it.

The problem with this level of detail about what might influence a judgment of believability is that it encourages people to think that any factor not mentioned should not be considered (after all, the judge didn't say «or anything else that you think reasonably bears on believability»).

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

At the time with which the L case was concerned the provisions about enhanced CRB certificates were set out in PA 1997, s 115, and so this is the provision considered in the judgment of the Supreme Court.

[51] In her judgment Andrews J referred to examples of the type of evidence required to attract legal advice privilege, to include a qualitative assessment of the evidence or any thoughts about its importance or relevance to the inquiry, or indications of further areas of investigation that the author of the notes considered might be fruitful.

However, a different judgment could be reached when one considers the unnecessary duplication of costs, the proliferation of sites and apparatus, and the attendant concerns about the consequences for health, property values and aesthetics.

Before the commercial mediators and counsel stop reading and click on the «delete» key, I ask them to consider the possibility that Mr. McMahon isn't making judgments about which method is «right» or «wrong» but, rather, is trying to say that the full potential and power of mediation is not being engaged in the commercial model.

However, the judgment has raised some technical issues about the consultation process, which we are carefully considering.

Since employers often make quick judgments about candidates, deciding rapidly who they will consider seriously and who they will eliminate from the process, it is to your advantage to avoid these killer mistakes:

Although excruciatingly difficult, I am attempting to withhold judgment about the fact that these prospective adoptive parents obviously consider the adoptee as a commodity rather than as a human being.

The court granted NAR's motion for summary judgment, finding that there was nothing unlawful about NAR supporting and sharing information with MLSs that were considering legal action against AHRN.