If the underlying facts amount to an offence under French law, such an interview would likely be
considered obstruction of justice.
Not exact matches
But now that special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating President Trump for
Obstruction of Justice, there are media reports that Rosenstein is
considering recusing himself as well, since he was involved in the Comey firing which may be part
of the investigation.
With respect to the special prosecutor's focus, we also have Comey's testimony that the investigation will also
consider whether Trump's interactions with Comey (including, especially, the firing itself) constituted an
obstruction of justice.
... We must
consider whether such actions constitute
obstruction of justice or tampering with witnesses that violate federal law.»
«To the extent anyone attempts to influence or tamper with a witness's recollection
of events relevant to our investigation, including the recollection
of a commissioner or one
of the commission's employees, we request that you advise our office immediately, as we must
consider whether such actions constitute
obstruction of justice or tampering with witnesses that violate federal law.»
«To the extent anyone attempts to influence or tamper with a witness's recollection
of events relevant to our investigation, including the recollection
of a commissioner or one
of the commission's employees, we request that you advise our office immediately, as we must
consider whether such actions constitute
obstruction of justice or tampering with witnesses that violate federal law,» Bharara wrote in July.
Consider this sentence: «The Washington Post says the special counsel is investigating Trump for possible
obstruction of justice.»