Yes it does, if not now then certainly later, in
the considered opinions of experts in Aus and the UK who candidly say so.
My guess is that if you had an illness that you didn't know anything about and had no personal experience with evaluating, you would do the absolute best you could to understand and
consider the opinions of experts, but at some point you would consider the preponderance of expert opinion in making a treatment decision.
Not exact matches
Wodatch explains, «We want kids getting in the practice
of weighing information, grappling with difficult problems that don't have clear answers,
considering different points
of view and data, asking for
expert opinions, and ultimately coming up with the solution.
Book lovers rely on the
opinion of experts to determine what new releases to
consider reading or purchasing.
When I was selected for jury duty, 20 years ago, I was the first peremptory challenge because I said that I would not take the word
of the psychologist as
expert testimony, but rather would
consider the
opinion of a man on the street as more valuable than that
of a psychologist.
While the language
of the
opinion may differ between independent
expert reports, all reports will
consider if the transaction is «fair» and if the transaction is «reasonable».
And like all
experts, each new issue always seems to kick off with a somewhat innocuous disclosure, then evolves into a frenzied scramble... to be followed by a detailed explanation
of how they always knew such a risk existed *, but in their
opinion (just like the rest
of the industry) it was
considered a remote & improbable risk (that existed outside normal codes
of industry practice).
Bottom Line, Inc. publishes the
opinions of expert authorities in many fields These
opinions are for educational and illustrative purposes only and should not be
considered as either individual advice or as a substitute for legal, accounting, investment, medical and other professional services intended to suit your specific personal needs.
Fringe beliefs at odds with the evidence and the
considered opinion of the vast majority
of competent
experts will always struggle with legitimacy.
Note that while we encourage deferring to
experts in any specific domain, due to people's intuitive tendency to have excessive confidence in their own
opinions and underestimate the value
of expert opinions, we
consider going against
expert opinion a violation
of the pledge only in the case
of a clear scientific consensus.
For example, the constant refrain about how «the consensus» was wrong about plate tectonics is useful for «skeptics» to exploit - and then argue that the existence
of a «consensus» on climate change isn't meaningful - when they don't also
consider just how pervasively we all trust the product
of scientists» work, and by extension the power
of shared
opinion among
experts, as we live our daily lives.
Of course, the preponderance of expert opinion wouldn't necessarily be dispositive - but you would consider it to be a factor in your decision makin
Of course, the preponderance
of expert opinion wouldn't necessarily be dispositive - but you would consider it to be a factor in your decision makin
of expert opinion wouldn't necessarily be dispositive - but you would
consider it to be a factor in your decision making.
If I can force you to guess, do you think that you'd find a similar (what you
consider to be paradoxical) pattern play out with the associations between political views and beliefs about evolution / scientific
expert opinion on evolution... or nuclear energy... or other issues that display a similar pattern
of association between political orientation and interpretations
of scientific evidence / how
experts interpret that evidence?
However,
considered as an ensemble
of individual
expert opinions, the assemblage
of local representations
of climate establishes both the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period as climatic anomalies with worldwide imprints, extending earlier results by Bryson et al. (1963), Lamb (1965), and numerous intervening research efforts.
In the
opinion of many
experts, expanded participation should be seriously
considered for some parts
of the process.
A: A jury will
consider testimony by
experts — usually other doctors — who will testify whether in their
expert opinion, your physician followed standard medical practice or fell below the accepted standard
of care.
The
expert's
opinion won't count for much on the witness stand if opposing counsel points out critical data he failed to
consider because he was unaware
of it.
We argued that the admissibility
of DRE
opinion on whether a person's ability to operate a vehicle is impaired by a drug or a combination
of alcohol and a drug should not be
considered expert evidence without first undergoing a judicial assessment through a Mohan voir dire.
When I was asked to provide a list
of areas in which I
consider myself «
expert» in, I listed eight or 10 topics / conditions / infections in which I believed that I could provide an
expert opinion.
The Court
of Appeal rejected the argument, finding that the trial judge
considered the
expert evidence favouring the physician to suffer from frailties such that the court could not rely on it to establish the existence
of a respectable minority
opinion.
When determining the best interests
of a child the South Carolina family court will
consider several factors, including: who has been the primary caretaker; the conduct, attributes, and fitness
of the parents; the
opinions of third parties such as the guardian ad litem,
expert witnesses, and the children; and the age, health, and sex
of the children.
First we didn't assume «doing your best» was related to effort or desire to do good, it related to having the understanding that boards
of directors and committees should be seeking independent, unbiased,
expert advice and contrarian dissenting
opinion on that advice to ensure, all options are
considered before entering any area impacted by new technologies.
Borges said homeowners should
consider having an independent appraisal prepared and present the appraisal report to the assessor because appraisers are third - party
experts who provide credible, reliable
opinions of value.