Sentences with phrase «considered points of no return»

Not exact matches

Ordinary metrics such as calls per day and minutes per call are a decent starting point, but they alone are not comprehensive enough to paint a complete picture of the skills of any particular sales rep.. So, consider incorporating lesser - used metrics into your performance tracking, such as voicemail - return rate, dial - to - opportunity percentage and dials - to - appointments ratio.

In these types of ventures, the gross loan portfolio appears large — but consider that the actual net revenue or return from these businesses is anywhere from a tenth of a basis point, topping out at 1 - 2 percent.

In fact, the operators of these investment clubs encourage people throughout the country to invest in bitcoin, and promise huge returns, yet this is not always the case, especially when investing in a Ponzi scheme - in fact, some of these schemes have gotten to the point of being hilarious, considering the fact that some promise a 100 % return on the initial investment.

But after considering the impact of taxes, the taxable - equivalent yield (the return required on a taxable bond to make it equal to the return of a tax - exempt bond) of municipal bonds was a full percentage point higher, at 3.75 %, for investors in the highest (37 %) tax bracket.

We consider the starting point valuation of value stocks (or any style factor, for that matter) to be a far more accurate predictor of future returns than the outlook for economic growth.

There was speculation at that point that Nebraska might hire Frost, who was then considered a rising star at Oregon, but despite a lot of support for that return to Nebraska's roots around the program, Eichorst hired Oregon State's popular, pleasant Mike Riley.

Considering that Arsenal had to play two Premier League games in three days, a return of 4 points from them is not such a bad thing, especially after being 3 - 0 down after 70 minutes against Bournemouth.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

At that point, Arsenal should seriously consider the return of Cesc Fabregas, as there are still few better than him at spotting and executing an assist.

United will be happy with even a draw which will take their points to 7 in three matches a good return considering every team is capabale of taking points of each other in Group A.

Yet, both the «nuclear» option of cutting assistance for good and the «wait - and - see» option might similarly lead to a point of «no return» for Moldovan rapprochement with the EU considering the likely outcome of the November 2018 elections.

At this point, I considered returning to school, but I just couldn't find a program of study that interested me enough to make that commitment.

Hybrid publishing points of interest: the difference between self - publishing and hybrid publishing, recommended companies to consider when pursuing hybrid publishing, various services provided by hybrid publishers, price point differences / royalty expectations, return on investment estimations, budgeting, and more.

But the point is there are better funds considering past returns, ease of operation, flexibility etc., Kindly read: Children's gift mutual funds review..

If you are unsure how long you will eventually stay in the UK and consider leaving the country at some point in the future (e.g. return to your home country in 3/5 years), one of the main factors to consider when making investment decisions is flexibility.

But after considering the impact of taxes, the taxable - equivalent yield (the return required on a taxable bond to make it equal to the return of a tax - exempt bond) of municipal bonds was a full percentage point higher, at 3.75 %, for investors in the highest (37 %) tax bracket.

We consider the starting point valuation of value stocks (or any style factor, for that matter) to be a far more accurate predictor of future returns than the outlook for economic growth.

For those seeking the bonuses of rewards points or store discounts, finding the card that offers the best added benefits and return on spending is an element to consider.

At some point you might consider devoting a portion of your nest egg to an immediate annuity in return for lifetime payments.

Considering that the prices of asset classes, and their respective sectors, usually rise and fall in tandem, the portfolio's total return can be more affected by its allocations than by the specific securities it holds, Investors Answers points out.

When you consider the sign - up bonus, annual 5,000 bonus points, and 10 % bonus points returned on redemptions, there is no question of value in the higher tier card.

But anyway, we now have news of the sale of the entire policy portfolio & an imminent wind - down of TLI to return 51p per share (subject to FX risk) to shareholders — considering my lack of faith in management at this point, this is the best job & end - result they could / should deliver.

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

• Be flexible about your travel dates and times • Book flights for late night or mid-morning, as they may be available for fewer points • Try to book your Award Flight as far in advance as possible • Consider booking a trip during the off - peak season • Try leaving early for a trip, or returning later, or consider flying on the actual day of the holiday, since most people like to overnight on big holidays like Thanksgiving and CConsider booking a trip during the off - peak season • Try leaving early for a trip, or returning later, or consider flying on the actual day of the holiday, since most people like to overnight on big holidays like Thanksgiving and Cconsider flying on the actual day of the holiday, since most people like to overnight on big holidays like Thanksgiving and Christmas

So when you calculate your return on spend on this card, you don't just want to consider the points you're earning, but also the potential value of status you could be earning through this card.

While DKC purists might be put off by the change in the formula of the traditional games, Donkey Kong Country Returns is an excellent comeback to what is considered one of the best game series of the SNES era, as well as a nice entry point for people who never played the original games.

As the analysis of contemporary criticism given elsewhere in this In Focus demonstrates, critics who saw the exhibition in which Meryon was first shown — held in late 1961 at the Sidney Janis Gallery, New York — were expecting at that point a «change» in artistic orientation and considered Kline's return to his black and white palette to be the product of a failure to develop his artwork.1

The subject of architecture returned as a point of reference to consider how the space of a museum could be a maker of intimacy and also exclusion.

The point isn't a «perpetual increase in atmospheric pressure» — that's a misnomer — if you consider the MASS of the atmosphere that is continuously «pumped» from cold air to hot air to cold air again, high up in the atmosphere — that creates «potential energy» from the kinetic energy of the convection — adiabatic expansion of the atmosphere is the result — the adiabatic compression occurs on the return trip of the previously warmed (from radiative energy) air as it completes the «cycle» as it comes back down!

Above 2 degrees Celsius is considered to be the point of no return for many climate scientists.

Their return to private practice was applauded by former Assistant United States Attorney and Chief of Major Frauds Section Beong - Soo Kim, now Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.: «Having had the privilege of supervising them at various points in their careers, I consider each to be a powerhouse in his or her own right — Jim in the area of securities fraud, Maggie with her public corruption cases, and David in the healthcare fraud arena.

Another point to consider is that the S&P 500, as used in our example, also derives some of its total return from dividend yield.

An additional point to consider is the assumed rate of return.