Sentences with phrase «considered protected speech»

University of Minnesota Law School professor Dale Carpenter told the Pioneer Press at the time of Jenkins» arrest that he doubted the tattoo would be considered protected speech.

Not exact matches

The fact that the justices agreed to hear the case means they are at least considering ruling that the speech and actions of the WBC are not constitutionally protected.

Guess now even what we write here considering our selves we are protected by the umbrella of freedom of speech and expressions, would come upon us one day as a witness against us, to what ever thoughts or chat we had will incriminate us although it was the only few steps taken forward to learn about the world round us and how people thought and how we though!?

North School Park in Arlington Heights is considered a public forum and has historically provided a space for the expression of constitutionally protected free speech, subject to reasonable Park District rules and regulations.

North School Park is considered a public forum and has historically provided a space for the expression of constitutionally protected free speech, subject to reasonable Park District rules and regulations.

While there are protected groups, is there also protected thoughts or speech that should be considered legally?

It's also part of a broader problem, in that politically - minded young people often seem instinctively uninterested in JS Mill - type arguments for free speech, and consider censorship questions as more about protecting certain groups from emotional pain than protecting individuals from those who would stop them participating in debate.

What I do it point out that David Rose is in such a position that his whoopsies are not mere misrepresentation, can not be casually dismissed as error, are not protected speech, and in sum and in total qualify by virtue of his profession, his being published, his prior bad acts and plentiful opportunities to correct errors that David Rose must be considered to be lying.

(As Cato and many others argued in last year's Supreme Court case of Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, controversial speech need not be true to be protected, and in practice an «only truth has rights» rule would give the state a stifling power to punish advocacy in debates that it considers settled.)

In his recent speech to the Society of Editors Conference, Paul Dacre, the Daily Mail editor and Associated Newspapers» editor - in - chief, launched a stinging attack on what he considers the most dangerous threat to press freedom in many years — the imposition of law protecting an individual's right to privacy.

The court remanded the rule to the committee to consider different approaches such as disclaimer language that would strike a balance between lawyers» speech rights and the interest in protecting consumers.

Jurisprudence also starts that all speech is Protected Political Speech, until proven otherwise, so the speaker of alleged unprotected speech need not provide any defense that his or her words should be considered such.

In determining whether speech is a protected opinion, a court must consider the totality of the circumstances.

Now plaintiffs of several political stripes have joined in a legal challenge alleging that they or their organizations ««routinely engage» in protected speech that «may be considered provocative»» and that the law is so vaguely and broadly worded as to subject them to «a credible risk of prosecution.»