This latest study, conducted by researchers at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the City University of New York (CUNY), highlights the importance of
considering societal changes when trying to determine future climate impacts.
Not exact matches
I think that you're right to identify these challenges as key to driving successful educational
change but I think that crucially, we first need to
consider the underlying purpose and philosophy of our educational systems and their relationship to wider
societal change.
The results are most useful when they are
considered in combination with other knowledge about the student population and the educational system, such as trends in instruction,
changes in the school - age population, and
societal demands and expectations.
Students
consider pottery, mosaics, and glassware as evidence of
societal change and daily life in ancient times.
In a news release from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Brian O'Neill, an author of the study (and someone who has long focused on the interplay of population and climate
change), stressed the importance of
considering the interplay of
societal patterns and climate patterns in gauging evolving risks:
For example, as law - makers
consider how to vote — and
consider how seriously to take the problem of climate
change — they should do so with an awareness that if they don't face and address climate
change via their decisions and votes, then at least some people will likely begin to embrace other approaches to
societal change, including NVCD, and justifiably so.
Although he spends much time discussing how
societal changes — the moving of persons and property into harm's way — make us increasingly vulnerable to hurricanes, he fails to seriously
consider the idea that when you add global warming to said
societal changes, the result could be a double whammy.
Consider an alternative universe where the scientists provided a range of scenarios to consider and included natural climate variability in the mix, and recommended that suite of policy options be developed to help reduce societal vulnerability to future climate change, both of the natural and anthropogenic
Consider an alternative universe where the scientists provided a range of scenarios to
consider and included natural climate variability in the mix, and recommended that suite of policy options be developed to help reduce societal vulnerability to future climate change, both of the natural and anthropogenic
consider and included natural climate variability in the mix, and recommended that suite of policy options be developed to help reduce
societal vulnerability to future climate
change, both of the natural and anthropogenic variety.
I wrote the Climate Shift report to inform the decision making of environmental leaders, philanthropists, scientists, scholars and others as they
consider next steps in the effort to mobilize
societal action on the undeniable, human causes of climate
change.
Then you need to look at the costs of minimizing AGW, costs of minimizing these
societal changes (which are presumably also economically driven), versus the benefits (which, in the case of minimising AGW, are generally
considered to be much more than simply reducing storm - related costs).