Sentences with phrase «considering using the defense»

Not exact matches

Aside from acceptable «basis» risk between the stocks we hold long and the indices we use to hedge, and perhaps 1 % of assets in option time - premium at any given time as a result of staggering our strikes to provide a stronger defense, we don't consider various speculative bubbles as threats to our own returns.

War and violence are considered as answers when they are used as instruments for justice, self - defense, or for defending innocent lives and preventing enormous damage to material means.

The only justifiable use of violence is in self defense, all other reasons can be considered criminal and unjustifiable by the law.

The primary purpose of the act was in defense of native American lands which they considered sacred as well as the use of peyote in their religious rituals.

Yet, FEAR IS ANOTHER CHAMBER TO RELEASE A GUN INTO THE HANDS OF THOSE, WHO ARE GOING TO GIVE AN ACCOUNT FOR ITS ONLY MEANS OF DEFENSE, WHEN WE ARE FINDING THAT IT IS TOO LIKELY THAT A GUN IS SET ON A SHELF TO EVENTUALLY BE USED, WHEN IT IS CONSIDERED AS A WEAPON AGAINST FEAR.

While officially Baghdad is now considering whether there is enough evidence of Turkey's involvement in oil trade with IS to file a formal protest at the UN Security Council, an Iraqi Defense Ministry spokesman, Naseer Nuri, told Sputnik on Wednesday that «general information about the smuggling of Iraqi oil by trucks to certain countries, including Turkey» is already available to them, and «this oil is used to fund Daesh.»

A defense force established under this section may be used within the jurisdiction concerned, as its chief executive (or commanding general in the case of the District of Columbia) considers necessary, but it may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the armed forces.

``... being considered by the US Air Force and the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,... using very low frequency radio waves to flush particles from [the Van Allen radiation] belts and dump them into the upper atmosphere over either one or several days.

Personally, I suppose I fall on the side of Let's Plays having a good case for a fair use defense and that a lot of factors considered can be argued in favor of LPs.

``... being considered by the US Air Force and the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,... using very low frequency radio waves to flush particles from [the Van Allen radiation] belts and dump them into the upper atmosphere over either one or several days.

In the meantime, as the NY Times points out, it may make sense to consider individual actions, such as more energy efficient appliances and increased vehicle efficiency, if the data shows net savings as a result of energy independence, reduced expenditures for fossil fuel due to reduced energy uses and potential reduction in defense expenditures as a result of reduced dependence on the middle east for oil.

Especially considering that a large - but - impossible - to - quantify amount of defense budget expenditures are used to militarily secure petroleum exporting regions — this is just backwards: According to the Institute for Policy Studies, for every $ 1 the US spends on climate security (funding cleantech like renewable energy or high speed rail), it will spend $ 42 on the military.

Our Assault and Battery defense team will also review your background to list all factors a prosecutor can consider for a dismissal or reduction of the Battery or Assault charges or that a judge can use to dismiss the case or limit the penalty to probation or some other lesser punishment.

Public defender programs are widely considered the most cost - effective way to deliver quality indigent defense services, which is why the federal government and every major urban area in the country â $» except Harris County â $» uses a public defender system.

It may not be the same as storing all client documents and privileged notes on Google Drive, but it is easy to imagine a scenario where a client's interests could be prejudiced if an adverse party gained specific knowledge of the queries that client's lawyer has used and the concepts they are considering in relation to the defense or prosecution of a claim.

Aaron Street: Yeah I mean I think this can be taken too far, so if you had an example like Brad where he only represents criminal defendants and therefore there's no risk of him having a conflict come through the site when he's getting actual information about actual cases, but you could see in a litigation, let's say a family law lawyer, if their website were trying to collect information to provide tools as both an intake and access to justice solution that you potentially run into tremendous conflicts of interest problems there and I think obviously any lawyer considering pursuing this for their firm should think through the implications of their particular situation, but I think what Brad's doing is awesome in the context of his criminal law practice and I think there are versions of a similar model that could be used in something like your debt collection defense practice or a small business startup practice or an estate planning practice, but that doesn't mean that it's a model that should be replicated by every lawyer in every practice.

Everything that's posted on social media is considered public, and even the most well meaning remarks about a personal injury claim could potentially be used against a plaintiff by the defense.

It would most likely be up to a jury to consider whether modern day football helmet has any design defects and, in weighing that question, a Massachusetts jury would be asked to weigh several factors: - the gravity of the danger posed by the current football helmet design - the likelihood that head injury will result from the use of the helmet - the technical feasibility of a safer alternative design - the financial feasibility of that alternative design, and - any other consequences likely to result from the alternative design However, even if a jury were to conclude that there exists a cost - effective design that would be more effective in preventing head injuries than the current football helmet design, the manufacturer might still have a few defenses under Massachusetts law: the so - called Vassallo defense and Correia defense.

In this context, the very use of the concept of «vital interests» should be viewed as problematic, having regard to the standard of «the very survival of a state», which the ICJ considered as possibly justifying self - defense by means of nuclear weapons (Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion, para 97).

Finally, the court considered the MLSonline's «nominative fair use» defense.