She considers issues of justice and accessibility, because, as she wrote in the American Journal of Bioethics, while «cancer and infertility are conditions that afflict all women equally and traverse class, race and ethnic lines, social and economic distinctions generally determine health care access.»
Not exact matches
As the nine
justices grappled with the technological complexities
of email data storage, liberals Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor questioned whether the court needed to act in the data privacy case in light
of Congress now
considering bipartisan legislation that would resolve the legal
issue.
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to
issue the final rulings
of its current term on Monday, amid talk that swing voter
Justice Anthony Kennedy is
considering retirement.
The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits
issued for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a court order the Corps did not «adequately
consider the impacts
of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental
justice.»
Polls showed the swaying
of young Christian voters toward the Democratic party, typically the party
considered more friendly to social
justice issues and helping «the least
of these.»
According to James Juhnke, this engagement is good for both sides: Mennonites are forced to
consider how nonviolence relates to
issues of justice and how it can be applied in terms
of public policy, while the broader church must take seriously «our claims that peace is central to the gospel.»
It will
consider natural law moral reasoning and its application to a variety
of moral and political
issues, including religious liberty, economic
justice, just war and capital punishment, abortion, euthanasia, and marriage and sexuality.
Nevertheless, besides the
issue of natural
justice, I think that desire is defined as something that is
considered to have a so - called positive outcome, so I would think that on a personal level self - immolation has no personal desire (unless «fame» and / or desire to die are there) and it is surely painful to the person self - immolating (unlike e.g. self - explosion), and the thing being probably
considered by individual persons as social sacrifice.
The governor, who is
considered a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2020, also plans to take on some
of the leading national
issues of the day - sexual harassment, climate change, the opioid epidemic, terrorism and reforming the criminal
justice system.
Labour's Jack Straw, who served as both home secretary and
justice secretary and attempted his own reforms
of the Lords when in government, urged the prime minister to
consider calling a pre-legislative referendum to avoid a «trainwreck» to Commons business in light
of the fact that the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats were «divided on this
issue».
However, in
considering the main appeal, a panel
of five
Justices of the Supreme Court in a unanimous judgment today resolved all the
issues against the appellant (Daudu) and accordingly dismissed the appeal in its entirety.
Socrates had grand
issues of morality,
justice and democracy in mind as he spoke, but over the millennia his words have been interpreted as a more general plea to
consider carefully the choices we make.
This is true even though very few Americans
consider global warming as an
issue of religion, social
justice, or poverty.
For an assessment
of one such case that could help states clarify matters on school vouchers — which the Supreme Court
considered just days after
Justice Gorsuch's arrival on the bench — check out this
issue's editor's letter.
The inclusiveness
of the Arts, the space they provide to conceptualise and explore
issues and the exposure to and influence upon audience allow students to enact social
justice as well as to
consider it.
While we may drastically disagree on the causes and solutions to
issues of poverty, social
justice, gender equality, the refugee crisis or finding peace in the Middle East, the ability to understand and carefully
consider an argument with which you disagree is the beginning
of insight.
Prepare instructional leaders who are cognizant
of the challenging
issues and rights faced by LCD learners in Pk - 16 educational settings
considering the moral, ethical, and social
justice perspectives.
An interagency group including DOT, State, Commerce, and
Justice was created to investigate these allegations and
consider the ongoing concerns
of stakeholders on both sides
of this
issue.
In the editor's note for the special
issue titled «Visualizing the Riot,» Chika Okeke - Agulu reminds readers that during the Civil Rights Movement artists
of color
considered the relationship between their work and politics and social
justice, citing three groups in particular — Spiral in New York; Los Angeles artists associated with the Watts Tower Arts Center; and Chicago - based AfriCOBRA.
But the current development
of wind power alternatives provides a great sense
of local community control over the next round
of energy development across the Great Plains, and many
of the tribal representatives
consider tribal wind power an environmental
justice issue.
A major significance for policy
of understanding climate change as a moral and
justice issue, is that nations may not look at economic self - interest alone in formulating policies, they must
consider their ethical and moral obligations to those who are most vulnerable to climate change.
In the first entry in this series we concluded that although the recent IPCC AR 5 Working Group III report is laudable improvement over prior IPCC reports in regard to identifying ethical and equity
issues that should be
considered in developing climate change policy, some criticisms are also warranted
of how IPCC has articulated the significance and implications
of the ethical,
justice, and equity principles that should guide nations in developing climate change policies.
A central
issue of concern in these negotiations is the need
of nations to take equity and
justice seriously when they make ghg emissions reductions commitments and when
considering their responsibility for adaptation, losses and damages in poor vulnerable countries.
These
issues include: (a) the need to determine when the obligation
of any nation is triggered, (b) difficulties in determining which adaptation and compensation needs are attributable to human - induced warming versus natural variability, (c) challenges in allocating responsibilities among all nations that have emitted ghg above their fair share
of safe global emissions, (e) challenges in prioritizing limited funds among all adaptation and compensation needs, (f) needs to set funding priorities in consultation with those who are vulnerable to climate change impacts as a matter
of procedural
justice, and (e) the need to
consider the capacity
of some nations to fund adaptation and compensation needs.
It's a dialogue that is «normal, that is traditional, that until now was not
considered problematic,» says Meehan, who notes he's not aware
of a chief
justice having flagged a potential
issue before.
In its Judgment
of 4 October 2012 in case C ‑ 629 / 11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (ESP - ISEP), the Court
of Justice has
issued another interesting decision on what should be
considered sufficient debriefing
of disappointed bidders in public procurement procedures.
«In short, in the absence
of any apparent relevance
of the material, speculatively said to be contained in the report, to the
issues which are to be explored at trial, the court does not
consider that it is in the interests
of justice to allow the recovery and this appeal is therefore refused.»
The following factors are
considered in determining recognition and enforceability
of a Alaska injunction: (a) are the terms
of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to
issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian
justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use
of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.
She said Alberta needs to do more on the
justice side
of the
issue akin to projects in Ontario that provide four hours
of free legal advice for anyone who has experienced sexual violence and is
considering going to the criminal courts.
This
issue was
considered further in August
of this year by Mr
Justice Munby in Re N (A Child) G v A [2008] EWHC 2042, [2008] All ER (D) 116 (Aug) where the father, in children proceedings, objected to the mother's McKenzie friend being granted a right
of audience.
Recommendation 87
of Jackson LJ's Final Report
of the Review
of Civil Litigation Costs, said the Master
of the Rolls should designate two Lord
Justices to
consider issues concerning the Civil Procedure Rules arising from the reforms.
I am especially concerned that most
of the
issues which
Justice Beatty would instruct the family court to
consider — housing, food, clothing, and medical care — are subject to unconscious bias based upon Mother's poverty as is demonstrated by the TPR order here.
The following factors are
considered in determining recognition and enforceability
of a Georgia injunction: (a) are the terms
of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to
issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian
justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use
of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.
It is clear from the Reasons
of Justice Sewell that he considered the privacy issue and considered access to j
Justice Sewell that he
considered the privacy
issue and
considered access to
justicejustice.
The most serious
issues arise in one
of the situations that
Justice Sotomayor addresses which the majority does not adequately
consider in the rebuttal in its own opinion, which is the situation where there are multiple possible defendants with different home states, whose relative liability is unknown or independent or mutually dependent.
These trends aren't limited to law schools or the profession as deep structural changes are occurring in wider society as well, but it's changing the profession slowly and eliminating what I
consider some
of its best parts: defence for the downtrodden, zealous advocacy on social
justice issues, or the ability to contest (and stop) governmental action.
In a letter to Richard Burgon MP, the shadow Chancellor and
Justice Secretary, and Diane Abbott dated 6 November, Theresa May confirmed that as part
of the LASPO review, the Lord Chancellor will
consider the
issue of publicly funded advice and representation at inquests.
But I
consider the failure to explore with a potential Chief
Justice of the United States
issues relating to police practices, crime and punishment, to be a very serious failing by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In a letter to Richard Burgon MP, the shadow
Justice Secretary and Diane Abbott dated 6 November, Theresa May confirmed that as part
of the LASPO review, the Lord Chancellor will
consider the
issue of publicly funded advice and representation at inquests.
Justice Brown advised counsel, before the motion, that he was
considering approaching the
issue of costs
of the motion on an «amount per refusal» basis, in the neighbourhood
of $ 1,500 per refusal.
Three academic researchers tackle open
justice issues in the final section: Professor Ian Cram looks at the effect
of Twitter on juries; Dr Lawrence McNamara
considers how the judiciary contributes to legal reform through «extra - judicial» statements; andLucy Series examines secrecy in the Court
of Protection.
The Court
of Appeal noted that there was no appeal on the question
of notice (at para 9), but the Minister
of Justice and Solicitor General
of Alberta intervened to reiterate the point that since Ernst had not filed notice
of a constitutional challenge to section 43
of the ERCA, that
issue should not be
considered.
In this case, the
issue was whether the Gladue factors were relevant in the context
of extradition and, in particular, whether the Minister
of Justice was required to
consider the Gladue factors in determining whether surrendering an accused Aboriginal person to be prosecuted in the United States.
Although we are in the middle
of a summer heat wave, a July 10, 2013 decision by
Justice Johnston in Grant v The Corporation
of the City
of Kingston and Queen's University, ONSC 4689 (CanLII) has caused me to
consider legal
issues regarding a claim for damages for personal injuries arising from a mid-winter slip and fall incident on an icy sidewalk.
In this session, we will
consider the likely overall direction
of travel
of key criminal enforcement agencies, looking at future developments from prosecutors, like the Serious Fraud Office and the US Department
of Justice, and their Asian and European equivalents, and the latest policy, case law and sentencing
issues affecting the business crime arena, as well as the prospects for private practitioners.
The Ontario Superior Court
of Justice recently dealt with the interesting
issue of what an arbitrator must
consider when making a determination about a party's request to adjourn an arbitration hearing, so as to ensure that all parties are treated equally and fairly.
The following factors are
considered in determining recognition and enforceability
of a Tennessee injunction: (a) are the terms
of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to
issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian
justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use
of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.
The following factors are
considered in determining recognition and enforceability
of a Missouri injunction: (a) are the terms
of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to
issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian
justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use
of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.
The following factors are
considered in determining recognition and enforceability
of a California injunction: (a) are the terms
of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to
issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian
justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use
of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.
While the Department
of Justice under the Obama Administration vigorously defended the rule, the
Justice Department under the Trump Administration recently filed a motion requesting an extension «to more fully
consider the
issues raised.»