Sentences with phrase «consistency reliability coefficient»

A high internal consistency reliability coefficient of.92 was computed for the subject matter pretest.

Steger et al. (2006) reported internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) ranging between.81 and.86 for Presence and between.84 and.92 for Search subscale.

Not exact matches

Due to the ordinal and categorical nature of the response options, reliability was assessed using polychoric correlation - based version of the reliability coefficients.45 These analyses suggested satisfactory internal consistency for the SDQ total difficulties scale (α = 0.86) and for all subscales (α emotional problems = 0.82, conduct problems = 0.71, hyperactivity — inattention = 0.76, peer problems = 0.75 and prosocial behaviours = 0.77).

A 45 - item, self - report measure used to assess the severity of anxiety within six subgroups (generalised anxiety, panic / agoraphobia, social phobia, separation anxiety, obsessive — compulsive disorder and physical injury fears) alongside providing an overall anxiety score.30 An analysis of the internal consistency of the SCAS31 produced a coefficient α of 0.92 and a Guttman split half reliability of 0.90.

The SESBI - R and ECBI have been shown to have high internal consistency for both Intensity (α = 0.98, α = 0.95) and Problem scales (α = 0.96, α = 0.93).54 Reliability coefficients at 12 - week intervals for SESBI - R and ECBI Intensity (r = 0.94 and r = 0.80) and Problem scales (r = 0.98 and r = 0.85) are also high.54 A reduction in score indicates fewer and / or less problematic disruptive behaviours.

tion of reliability included: internal consistency: to calculate Cronbach coefficient; coefficient of retest re

Internal consistency of the UCLA was determined by calculating Cronbach (α) alpha coefficient (with α = 0.7 indicating sufficient reliability).

Determination of reliability included: internal consistency: to calculate Cronbach coefficient; coefficient of retest reliability: to calculate person correlation of results in every subscale in twice measurements of 52 parents.

Reliability coefficients indicate that all measures demonstrated adequate internal consistency rReliability coefficients indicate that all measures demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliabilityreliability.

Previous studies have found TCSQ to have high reliability and validity as a measure of coping style in China.49 50 In this study, Cronbach's α for the total scale was 0.845, and the internal consistency coefficients of the subscales were α = 0.823 (positive coping) and α = 0.863 (negative coping).

We use SPSS18.0 to analyze the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and the result shows that all variables» Cronbach's alpha coefficient is above 0.7, which suggests the internal consistency of the variables is good, and the scales have a high reliability.

Alpha coefficients of (reliability) questions about the subscales of secure, avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles regarding a student sample (1480 people) were calculated to be respectively 0.86, 0.84 and 0.85 for all the subjects, which indicate good internal consistency of Adult Attachment Scale.

The consistency coefficients ranged from 0.75 to 0.90; reliability was highest regarding «affective well - being» and lowest regarding the coping subscales.

In phase II, internal consistency of the Urdu translated version of PLS was determined through test re-test reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Results indicated the good level of internal consistency in form of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α =.89).

In phase II, internal consistency was computed through test - retest reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Internal consistency was included the cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation respectively.

Like the STAI trait, the CES - D is a reliable assessment with alpha coefficients of internal consistency ranging from.80 to.90 and a 2 - week to 1 - year test — retest reliability ranging from.40 to.70 (Eaton et al.).

BADL internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's and Guttman coefficients; test — retest reliability was also observed.

The PBS significantly differentiates diagnostic groups (Lindgren & Koeppl, 1987; Mayes, Calhoun, & Crowell, 2001), internal consistency for subscale scores is high (median coefficient.91), and inter-rater reliability for mothers and fathers is.71 (Lindgren & Koeppl, 1987).

Alpha coefficients were computed with a cutoff of 0.70 (or higher) indicating acceptable internal consistency reliability.

We used the Spanish validated version that shows adequate psychometric properties such as internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.83) and test - retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.83)[53].