Sentences with phrase «consistent about doing it»

Once your dog is reliably barking to tell you he needs to go out and is consistent about doing it all over the house, you should need to practice very little to maintain his training.

If you start the process when your kitten is young and are consistent about doing it, she'll probably accept the process without complaint (or with minimal complaining) once she's mature.

Well, he knows; he just isn't very consistent about doing it.

Not exact matches

This is consistent with Fortune's annual Change the World list, which isn't about philanthropy but rather nuts - and - bolts business that does good by doing well.

Salary plus bonuses for a job well done, the ability to work from home if your child is sick or something comes up in your personal life, consistent celebrations throughout the year, and free snack bar during year end so you don't have to worry about food and can save some money over the holidays.

Being consistent is about matching what you say with what you do.

The bottom line is that Apple's ambitions in the content industries seem to be hampered in part by a lack of a consistent vision about what the company wants to do and why, combined with a culture clash between existing movie studios and TV networks about who is the most important player in the relationship, and who gets to control the terms.

«You have to do a little bit of work to understand settings on your camera and to understand a little bit about lighting so you can recreate it [to keep your images consistent over time].»

«If the answers show a consistent theme of talking about BS factors rather than a clear line toward being able to do interesting work related to their field, it's hard to project them as passionate in their field,» cautions Dunn.

My conclusion, one consistent with about 50 years of peer - reviewed research, was just to always own both small and large company stocks, and that's what we do here at STMM.

If you're worried about keeping your content consistent, don't.

Isn't this what so many of us don't like about people who use religious tradition as a means for explaining their behavior... they're not CONSISTENT?

Now, i can quote from LOTR all day long, about what Sauron did to who, and when, and how Frodo saved the day, etc, etc, etc. i can give you hundred of pages of quotes, and put it all together in a logically consistent package to establish some point I want to prove about Aragorn.

«honoring the Lord in a manner consistent with biblical principles» It does not say anything about abortion.

You can have faith someone you've always known to be honest is being honest when he tells you something, or you can have faith someone will «do the right thing» in a situation because that would be consistent with what you know about him.

I don't doubt that what you are saying is true about the college's position theologically and whether that is consistent with Dr.Hawkins or not.

If you don't trust science, at least be consistent about it instead of lying to yourself about what is and isn't scientifically backed you coward.

(3) Once our theology and faith themes are established, those stories and themes about Jesus which we do not claim as factual, but which are consistent with our faith themes, can be used as Christian Myth to illustrate, illuminate, and emphasize these themes.

why talk about compassion if you don't believe its real or consistent (because it's subjective) in the first place?

Bernstein sees Dewey's liberal, political outlook as completely consistent with his view that philosophy's main task is «to become practical, where this means addressing itself to the basic issues and conflicts that confront us, and making practical judgments about what is to be done» (PA 225).

We must be consistent with our earlier conclusions about how God does and doesn't act.

Nevertheless, I think that my analysis is at least suggested by some of the claims that Whitehead does make about the process of concrescence and that it is consistent with all of the claims that he makes about concrescence.

I think if there is one thing that has remained consistent about the Doctor over the years, it is that he is pro-life in all its iterations — he's curious about and fascinated by all life, he doesn't think that different equals bad.

Some of our best philosophers and social critics have thought that our troubles do indeed stem from our loss of any consistent and coherent way of talking about the things that matter deeply.

I don't know about you, but I would believe the people who study the human mind, thoughts, and behavior (i.e. psychologists and sociologists), over someone who says there's some spooky external agent that no one can possibly verify the existence of, and which has no consistent pattern of action with which to use as evidence for verification.

It does not follow that the statement «God brings about S» is consistent.

Has a large gap always existed between what people say about attendance and what they actually do, or have consistent responses to the polls masked declines in actual church attendance?

Now if I say to a crowd, «Tonight I want to talk about the ways we fracture our lives and don't live consistent walks of faith,» Broca will step in and file that idea away because we've all heard that before.

«Relativizing the relativizer» only works if the relativist «actually [cares] about having an airtight, logically consistent worldview,» which not all people do, she points out.

Remember my sad oven story that I told you a couple of weeks ago about how my oven doesn't hold consistent temperature?

So I really don't gravitate to creating routines for myself but I know I function better when I'm consistent about them.

I've been doing a lot of health research lately and it's no surprise that the consistent theme that keeps coming up is about probiotics and healing the gut.

I'm really undecided about Cazorla because he sometimes plays so well buthe isn't consistent at all, he doesn't provide width or pace or work very hard in defence so he shouldn't be guaranteed a starting spot.

He arguably doesn't get the credit that he deserves, but if United and Liverpool are indeed targeting Jorginho as a solution to their problems in midfield, they're certainly looking in the right place as he is a reliable and consistent performer who goes about his business with real class and minimal fuss.

There's a more sophisticated analysis that could be done about it, but consider that he's 20 and humans that are 20 - years - old aren't consistent with anything.

I don't moan at any little thing or a mistake a player makes, it's moaning about consistent errors every season!

Great for Maureen to talk about giving chance to youth players, then go and sign a expensive big name at 29 years old For Ospina, I know he divided opinion but some statistics does not lie, we conceeded large number of goals from crosses in the 2nd half of the season — he is a consistent goalkeeper and fine shot stopper but never a commanding one.

That's why I've been telling you guys I'm not Resource.Resource always says LACALEMAR.I don't do that.Why is there a need for me to have two accounts just to share transfer info?I've been correct about everything except Neymar.Please I've been very consistent in my updates.Read them very well.Insider sources don't generalise for the day.They give minute by minute info so one moment it could be here and the other moment there.They've broken many deals about so many clubs ahead of time with them making a mistake in the Neymar one.

I thought about it for a second and every time I used to have an argument with someone who loves Giroud as much as Wenger does, they always told me that if more chances where created, Giroud would be a hell of a lot more consistent than he his....

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

but it does not seem what wenger is doing in summer is consistent with the goals kroenke is talking about here.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

There team is more balanced and consistent than us.Neither did Arsenal big signings turned up nor thus i see any young prospect to get excited about except iwobi and bellerin (considering their age).

I for one believe that it is not about about having a world class striker that wins you a league however having having a world class striker increases your chance of winning a league.Having said that I just hope we go for Icardi or a world class striker or someone who isn't necessarily world class but just knows how to do his job and put it in there.I'd urge Wenger to go for Javier Hernandez or Callum Wilson.They would bang it in and would have world class form because they would have consistent quality support from the midfield.It's all about him being serious and telling himself he can do it.I'm just tired tired of watching that so called striker in our club let alone him starting for us.Its just pathetic.

I fully understand we just lost one game and uts not the end of the world but am struggling to deal with is the consistent lack of mental toughness that are the hallmarks of all title winning teams... we need to be proactive and stop been reactionary, simples... we had what is in all honesty a good couple of matches begining of the season WINNABLE games but we already fell short at the first hurdle now all the talk is about bouncing back, whatever happened to eyes on the ball straight from the off... a Westham side with a new manager, some new players and a 16 year old making his debut beating Arsenal at home is just plain disgraceful and whatever happens next does not in any way mitigate against that.....

«This season is about improving the squad, bringing players to make us more consistent, so we don't go through difficult periods like last season when we had crucial injuries.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

We don't need to even talk about Barcelona and Madrid, they are consistent world beaters, their squad quality justifies their achievements.

«It's just another way for me to learn more about my game [and see] what I'm doing well and see what my weaknesses are... so I can be more consistent on a daily basis.»

«It definitely isn't because I already decided I was going to be mad about this and am not willing to consider that there may be an actual story involved that is consistent with the way this character has been portrayed in his limited talking segments since he returned that doesn't actually fit my «it must be racism» angle»