The error in coverage exceeds any possible human impact and is one more factor causing
consistently failed predictions.
Not exact matches
In a normal world, scientists who are repeatedly wrong, who create models that
consistently fail, who make outlandish
predictions that
fail to materialize, etc., are scientists who lose credibility.
... The reason good scientists do not believe in apocalyptic global warming theory is because that theory has
failed consistently (and outrageously, given its hype) to produce skillful
predictions.