Sentences with phrase «conspiracist ideation»

A study by Lewandowsky and colleagues of «the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial» was the subject of several Retraction Watch posts when it was retracted and then republished in a different form.

A study by Lewandowsky and colleagues of «the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial» was the subject of several Retraction Watch posts when it was retracted and then

The results are important for theoretical reasons because they extend the literature on conspiracist ideation as well as on the role of the internet as a staging ground for the rejection of science.

Actually, our criteria for conspiracist ideation come from a number of peer - reviewed examinations of conspiratorial thinking and have nothing to do with the substance of any criticism of LOG12.

Mack illustrates the «self - sealing» character of conspiracist ideation perfectly: nothing a climate scientist does can have a non-sinister explanation.

As a further refinement, I noted that conspiracist ideation thrives on creating specific malicious others as a particuarly powerful form of meaning - making.

The analysis of conspiracist ideation occurred after that, and involved the criteria mentioned at the outset.

The first paper, though it mentions no sceptics by name, clearly indicates Steve McIntyre and Anthony Watts as typical sceptics of the kind it links with conspiracist ideation.

In conducting this analysis, we contribute to the scholarly literature on conspiracist ideation by synthesizing a broad body of research into a single, coherent set of attributes of conspiratorial discourse:

Conspiracist ideation predicts rejection of science — not just climate science, but also the (even stronger) and even more strongly, rejection of the link between HIV and AIDS and the link between tobacco and lung cancer.

Although suggestions exist about how to rebut conspiracist ideations e.g., by indirect means, such as a rmation of the competence and character of proponents of conspiracy theories, or a rmation of their other beliefs (e.g., Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009) we argue against direct engagement for two principal reasons.

Nonetheless, each data set must be examined for outliers and «unusual» responses, and our recent paper on conspiracist ideation and the motivated rejection of science is no exception.

If all observations above that line (i.e., scores 25 or greater; there were 31 of those) are removed from the analysis, the link between the latent constructs for conspiracist ideation and rejection of climate science remains highly significant (specifically, the p - value is <.001), which means that the association is highly unlikely (less than 1 in 1000) to have arisen by chance alone.

In the case of our study, one principal result of interest involved the negative correlation between conspiracist ideation and acceptance of science.

A year after being clumsily removed from the web following complaints, a controversial paper about «the possible role of conspiracist ideation in the rejection of science» is being retracted.

In «The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science,» he approached the influence of worldviews and conspiratorial thinking (AKA «conspiracist ideation») as related types of motivated reasoning which interfere with scientific truth - seeking.

The paper, «Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation,» was authored by Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, Klaus Oberauer, and Michael Marriott, and published in Frontiers in Psychology: Personality Science and Individual Differences.

The criteria for conspiracist ideation are applicable without regard to a statement's truth or falsity.

In the paper, Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation, Lewandowsky claimed to, «identify and trace the hypotheses that emerged in response to LOG12 and that questioned the validity of the paper's conclusions.

My own conclusion is far more important that the «conspiracist ideation» idea.

The overall pattern of the blogosphere's response to LOG12 illustrates the possible role of conspiracist ideation in the rejection of science, although alternative scholarly interpretations may be advanced in the future

Conspiracist ideation is a style of thinking, otherwise known as conspiratorial thinking.

In this article, I provided preliminary evidence that the pseudo-scientific arguments that underpin climate denial are mutually incoherent, which is a known attribute of conspiracist ideation.

The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science.

But the research also found a correlation between denial of human caused climate change science and «conspiracist ideation», such as acceptance of supposed CIA plots to kill Martin Luther King, faked Moon landings or how the US government let the Japanese attack Pearl Harbour so they could enter World War II.

The first was about the recent paper, «Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation,» by Lewandowsky.