Not exact matches
There are a number of California laws that prohibit employers from engaging
in behaviors that
constitute workplace
discrimination, harassment, and retaliation including the California Fair
Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), and the California Equal Pay Act.
Canadian human rights laws universally expressly prohibit employers from both refusing to employ and refusing to continue to employ anyone on a discriminatory basis, or discriminating
in any
employment term or condition based on «sex» — and it's long - settled that sexual harassment
constitutes discrimination on the basis of sex.
The Vice-Chair held that Kulczycki's conduct
constituted unlawful
discrimination in the
employment since it related to an incident that occurred
in the workplace.
Moreover, the Court of Appeal held that the quasi-constitutional right to accommodation
in the workplace, pertaining to an enumerated ground of
discrimination under section 10 of the Charter, such as a disability,
constitutes a preeminent standard that transcends the law,
employment contracts and collective agreements.
Not all
discrimination in the workplace
constitutes discrimination «regarding
employment or any term or condition of
employment», as s. 13 stipulates.