State
constitutional education clauses are generally of three kinds.
School funding cases are complicated enough for state courts, even with state
constitutional education clauses to interpret.
Not exact matches
To avoid this outcome, a new wave of school - finance litigation has instead endorsed an «adequacy» claim based on state
constitutional clauses that exhort the legislature to provide for a «thorough and efficient» (or similar language) system of
education.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), along with Americans United for Separation of Church and State, sued, citing a host of
constitutional offenses, including violating the ban on support for private schools and churches (the state's Blaine Amendment), the ban on religious tests, the guarantee of religious freedom, the uniformity requirement in the
education clause, the prohibition on support for private institutions, and, for good measure, the guarantee of local control.
Forty - three years have passed since the U.S. Supreme Court narrowly ruled in the landmark San Antonio v. Rodriguez school - funding case that
education was not a
constitutional right and that the disparate spending on
education for students from low - income neighborhoods was not a violation of the equal protection
clause of the U.S. Constitution.