«We also welcome the Prime Minister's comments today that acknowledge the importance of
constitutional recognition as an important step towards Closing the Gap and broader efforts to bring about a just, reconciled Australia.»
On other important Indigenous health issues, Croakey covered the launch of the Lowitja Institute's «Recognise health» initiative, a project that supports
constitutional recognition as a pathway to better health and wellbeing for Aboriginal people.
Not exact matches
«Today's opinion dismantles the structure of
constitutional law that has permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and homosexual unions, insofar
as a formal
recognition in marriage is concerned,» wrote Scalia.
The platform planks for «32 embodied a number of Century concerns: U.S. adherence to the World Court protocol; U.S. entry into the League of Nations, provided that its covenant be amended to eliminate military sanctions; U.S.
recognition of the Soviet Union (which was granted a year later); the safeguarding of the rights of conscientious objectors (including those denied citizenship, such
as Canadian - born theologian D. C. Macintosh of Yale Divinity School); the abolition of compulsory military training in state - supported educational institutions other than military and naval academies; emergency measures for relief and public - works employment; the securing of
constitutional rights for minorities; the reduction of gross inequality of income by steeply progressive rates of taxation on large incomes; «progressive socialization of the ownership and control of natural resources, public utilities and basic industries»; «the nationalization of our entire banking system»; and so on (June 8, 1932).
Worley's initial sermon was partly framed
as a response to Obama's endorsement of same - sex marriage, which he made in a TV interview a day after North Carolina voters passed a state
constitutional amendment banning legal
recognition of such marriages and other types of gay unions.
Like the title of his recent book, My Scotland, Our Britain, and his post-referendum agenda for further devolution to Scotland and broader
constitutional reform, Brown's vision has offered no place for or political
recognition for England
as a nation.
But now the law has been federally enshrined by the Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established
Constitutional Heritage Act, otherwise known
as the Speech Act and Rory's help is getting serious
recognition in the new book, «You Can't Read This Book: Censorship in an Age of Freedom.»
There is nowhere in the constitution that any ministerial portfolio has been created... So far
as they have ministerial roles and functions, the only Minister who has been given
constitutional recognition is the office of the Attorney General so with due respect to him, I do not see how he will have any serious argument to press home either in the court or within Parliament because it is pathetic... I am afraid his argument is jejune.
He said he believed there was a «serious legal and
constitutional conflict» between the boundary changes and the relatively recent
recognition of the Cornish
as a national minority.
Just
as in the previous week's security certificates case (where the effect of the invalidity was delayed for a year), the Court reasons its way towards a remedy in a way that at present is beyond the pale in Australia (where unlike Canada is there is no explicit
constitutional recognition of the rule of law
as a
constitutional value).
[1] In the Reference Re Secession of Quebec, the Supreme Court explained that the
recognition of underlying
constitutional principles «could not be taken
as an invitation to dispense with the written text of the Constitution».
In a January 2010 post, ABlawg's Top Cases and Legal Developments from the 2000s, and a Vote for Dunmore, I nominated Dunmore
as the top
constitutional decision of the 2000s for its
recognition that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms may impose positive obligations on government.
450 BCE Traditional date for the establishment of the Torah 624 CE Constitution of Medina (described by some
as the world's first written constitution) 633 Quran 1087 Irnerius starts the first law school at Bologna 1190 — Enactment by Eleonore d'Aquitaine of the Laws of Oleron in maritime law 1259 The Provisions of Westminster 1274 Second Council of Lyons 1300 The Statute of Forestallers (printed in Statutes of the Realm) 1474 The Treaty of Utrecht with the Hanseatic League Printed in English Historical Documents 1327 - 1485 (by A.R. Myers and David Douglas) 1474 — Venetian patent statute, first
recognition of patents 1506 the Statute of Jan Laski, the first Continental European
constitutional statement of the rule of law.
From R. v. Powley in 2003 (which recognized that Métis communities have pre-existing aboriginal rights protected by s. 35) to Cunningham v. Alberta in 2011 (wherein Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin urged that «the time has finally come for
recognition of the Métis
as a unique and distinct people») to Manitoba Métis Federation v. Canada in 2013 (which recognized the outstanding
constitutional grievance of the Manitoba Métis flowing from land grant provisions set out in s. 31 of the Manitoba Act, 1870), the Supreme Court of Canada has been consistent and unequivocal: s. 35 demands good faith and meaningful negotiations and reconciliation with the Métis people
as well.
Some workshop participants saw this
as a way of moving towards a more sustainable self - determination; others were sceptical that
constitutional recognition would lead to real change.
He commented on the significant ways in which governments have already started to implement the Declaration, such
as through
constitutional recognition.
Phillips welcomed the commitment, describing a Treaty
as «a seat at the table» versus the «crumbs off a table» that
Constitutional Recognition delivers.
«The National Apology in 2008 was the crest of a new wave of commitment towards reconciliation in Australia — we owe it to ourselves
as a nation to ride this wave further to give Indigenous Australians the
Constitutional recognition we deserve.»
We might disagree on how we get there,
as there are a diverse range of views among First Nations peoples about
constitutional recognition.
«
Constitutional recognition is so important because it is about
recognition of Aboriginal heritage, our connection to country and our rights
as Australia's First Peoples.
«It is also critical that
constitutional recognition does not prevent or make void any efforts by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to assert their rights
as sovereign peoples or to pursue a treaty.
The Expert Panel will report to the Government on possible options for
constitutional change to give effect to Indigenous
constitutional recognition, including advice
as to the level of support from Indigenous people and the broader community for each option by December 2011.
As this Report was being finalised the Australian Government established an Expert Panel on
Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians (Expert Panel).
From justice to health to
Constitutional recognition; the Commission urges all governments to listen and act on the advice of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples regarding the issues that most affect them,
as outlined in the Redfern Statement.
That the Australian Government make the report of the Expert Panel on
Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians public
as soon
as practicable following its submission.
The Panel terms of reference (see Appendix 4) required it to «lead a broad national consultation and community engagement program to seek the views of a wide spectrum of the community» [51] and report to Government on «possible options for
constitutional change to give effect to Indigenous
constitutional recognition, including advice
as to the level of support from Indigenous people and the broader community for each option by December 2011».
«To create meaningful and substantive change, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples must shape the process for
constitutional recognition,
as well
as the final proposal put to the Australian public,» Mr Mohamed said.
I am pleased to have been appointed
as an ex-officio member to the Expert Panel on
Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians.
This does not obviate the possibility of acknowledging formal knowledge of the existence of Indigenous legal and political systems at a
constitutional level or at the common law,
as in the case of Mabo The functional approach advocated by the ALRC enables both the
recognition of the continuing existence of Aboriginal law and custom and sufficient flexibility for Aboriginal people to be self - determining in the definition of customary law.
Request that the Government and the Opposition identify the parameters of what they will support in relation to
constitutional recognition, based on the issues identified by the various review processes to date,
as well
as their willingness to consider further measures to address the specific circumstances faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Participants identified that over the next 20 years, the national representative body would have a leading role to play in achieving
constitutional recognition and a treaty, in closing the gap, and in Australia
as a country owning and facing up to its history.