Opponents have one last - ditch strategy for avoiding the ruling's effect, says Purdue University Law School professor and
constitutional scholar Robert Gandalf.
So, the contemporary
constitutional scholar Robert Lowry Clinton argues that it is a mistake to read the case as claiming a judicial power to tell the President or Congress what they can or can not do under the Constitution.
The essay by the distinguished jurist and
constitutional scholar Robert H. Bork on «lawless law» was an important part of that symposium, and he returns to that subject in a comprehensive and devastating article in the New Criterion, titled «Adversary Jurisprudence.»
Not exact matches
We experienced these latter consequences three years ago when a number of left - liberal
scholars, politicians, and pundits attempted to read Judge
Robert Bork out of the American political and
constitutional mainstream.