And, with
all constitutional school choice programs, parents — and not the government — decide which (if any) school a child attends.
Not exact matches
The statement includes a list of these developments: the US Supreme Court ruled scholarships
constitutional; numerous studies showed these
programs benefit needy kids; families empowered with this
choice express great satisfaction; urban districts continue to struggle despite great effort; chartering hasn't created enough high - quality seats; and smart accountability systems can ensure only high - quality private
schools participate in these
programs.
And voucher opponents have been creative in identifying a wide variety of
constitutional provisions, having nothing to do with religion, under which to challenge
school choice programs.
Alabama's scholarship tax credit
programs follow in the footsteps of at least six similar tax credits dating to the 1970s that give students a
choice of public, private or religious
schools, demonstrating that scholarship tax credits are
constitutional.
In 2002, the
school choice movement received one of its biggest victories when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its landmark Zelman v. Simmons - Harris case declaring
school voucher
programs like those in Milwaukee, WI and Cleveland, OH
constitutional.
Even with the Blaine Amendment in place in Mississippi, legal scholars are confident that private
school choice programs are
Constitutional in Mississippi based on prior state court rulings.
To justify this ban on special education for children in religious
schools, Washington relied on state
constitutional Blaine Amendments — the same unfortunate relics of 19th - century anti-religious bigotry that opponents of
school choice programs rely on to thwart educational opportunity.
The new lawsuit challenging the Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account
program claims the
program violates the same
constitutional provisions used to strike down the previous voucher
programs — specifically, that they don't offer
choice beyond a private
school option — but Empowerment Accounts differ from these earlier
programs in important and constitutionally relevant ways.
And, as with all
constitutional choice programs, parents — not the government — decide which
school a child attends.»
Not only does the federal government lack
constitutional jurisdiction (outside of Washington, D.C., military installations, and tribal lands), but a federal voucher
program poses a danger to
school choice efforts nationwide because a less - friendly future administration could attach regulations that undermine
choice policies.
In Florida, a victory for two
school choice programs — both ruled
constitutional.
Reality: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that appropriately - designed private
school choice programs are fully
Constitutional.
In fact, two
school choice programs have been struck down on state
constitutional grounds — state being broadly construed.