The UFT is appealing a state judge's ruling that allowed a lawsuit challenging
the constitutionality of teacher tenure and seniority rights to proceed.
Not exact matches
Opponents
of New York State's
teacher tenure laws won a small but important victory when a Staten Island judge allowed a lawsuit challenging the
constitutionality of those rules to move forward.
In April, the California Court
of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group
of families had challenged the
constitutionality of state laws governing
teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants
tenure to
teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to
teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisions.)
On Wednesday, the Star Tribune's Beena Raghavendran reported that the Minnesota Court
of Appeals heard oral arguments for a lawsuit in which a group
of parents are challenging the
constitutionality of Minnesota's
teacher tenure, dismissal, and «last in, first out» laws.
Villaraigosa also fought for
teacher tenure reforms, backing the plaintiffs in the Vergara case, which challenged the
constitutionality of state
tenure and layoff statutes on the grounds that they harmed low - income students.