Some of
the construction litigation issues our trial lawyers handle include:
ADLI Law Group is experienced in litigating these complex
construction litigation issues and multiple party cases.
Not exact matches
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in
construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be
issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related
litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Her experience includes a wide variety of insurance
issues (automobile coverage disputes, commercial general liability, business interruptions, tenant liability, fire, and cannabis - related
issues) as well as general commercial
litigation issues related to contractual disputes,
construction litigation and negligence.
Characterizing its practice as a «general practice for a specialized clientele,» the firm provides legal advice and expertise to handle any and all needs of a school district, including fair dismissal personnel
issues, allegations of employment discrimination and EEOC complaints, other personnel disputes, student discipline
issues, student tribunal hearings, civil rights claims, personal injury actions, federal and state constitutional claims and other
litigation, special education and other legal
issues involving disabled students, contracts, leases and other business needs, policy and rule development,
construction disputes, bond and SPLOST
issues and other financial matters.
Providing a general law practice for a specialized clientele, Harben, Hartley & Hawkins meets all of the legal needs of school districts including: fair dismissal personnel
issues, allegations of employment discrimination and EEOC complaints, other personnel disputes, student discipline
issues, student tribunal hearings, civil rights claims, personal injury actions, federal and state constitutional claims and other
litigation, special education and other legal
issues involving disabled students, contracts, leases and other business needs, policy and rule development,
construction disputes, bond and SPLOST
issues and other financial matters.
• School Expansion, Growth & Strategic Planning • State and Federal Employment Law • School Board and Nonprofit Governance • Administrative Law & Appeals of State and Federal Agency Decisions and Actions • Special Investigations & Legal / Compliance Audits • Policy Guidance and Development • Constitutional Challenges and Claims • School Employee and School Board Training •
Litigation in Federal and State Courts • Administrative Hearings and Appeals Before State and Federal Agencies • Public Entity Purchasing and Procurement; Business Transactions; & Contract Negotiation, Review and Drafting •
Construction Law, AIA
Construction Contracts, Review and Drafting • Real Estate Transactions and Condemnation • Special Education under IDEA and Section 504 • Student Rights & Discipline
Issues and Hearings • State and Federal Claims of Discrimination • State and Federal Civil Rights • Administrative Grievances and Hearings • False Claims Act / Qui Tam Defense for Local Government Entities
She advises County agencies on
construction law and related insurance coverage
issues, and represents King County in alternative dispute resolution forums and
litigation.
Jason Pettus is a civil
litigation defense attorney with a strong
litigation background through the representation of general contractors, subcontractors, owners, and design professionals in the resolution of all manner of
construction issues, including
construction / design defect claims, environmental claims and contractual disputes, catastrophic injury, premises liability, and motor vehicle accidents in both state and federal courts, as well as insurance coverage analysis, advisement of clients, and coverage
litigation.
We have represented many education institutions for many years in a vast variety of civil
litigation matters, including contract disputes,
construction disputes, building envelope and environmental separation concerns, maintenance of capital structures, labour
issues, defamation, judicial review, and providing defence to educators.
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America ®,
Construction Litigation, Julianne has litigated, arbitrated and mediated complicated mechanics lien disputes, surety bond claims, concrete placement issues, construction delay claims, site utility specifications, cleanroom construction specifications and structural steel claims, to name a few, representing owners, general contractors, subcontractors an
Construction Litigation, Julianne has litigated, arbitrated and mediated complicated mechanics lien disputes, surety bond claims, concrete placement
issues,
construction delay claims, site utility specifications, cleanroom construction specifications and structural steel claims, to name a few, representing owners, general contractors, subcontractors an
construction delay claims, site utility specifications, cleanroom
construction specifications and structural steel claims, to name a few, representing owners, general contractors, subcontractors an
construction specifications and structural steel claims, to name a few, representing owners, general contractors, subcontractors and suppliers.
He discusses with Lawyer Monthly
issues the
construction industry can face and the best way to avoid
litigation in such cases.
Dana Chaaban focuses her practice on commercial and
construction litigation, where she represents developers, contractors, material suppliers, and design professionals in disputes involving
construction defect claims, delay claims,
construction lien
issues, and contract disputes.
Bailey has experience assisting clients with a variety of legal
issues in a broad range of areas including commercial
litigation (i.e. shareholder disputes and related matters), contractual disputes, negligence, personal injury,
construction litigation, picketing and injunctions, debtor / creditor
litigation, and professional regulatory matters.
In addition, she is well - versed in
construction litigation and general liability
issues.
If you are facing complex
issues in
construction, insurance law or
litigation, you know you have to take decisive action to protect your interests.
Mr. Arias has written, lectured and spoken on various subjects at law schools, legal seminars, webinars and legal conferences on topics including: litigating class actions, mass tort
litigation, expert witness depositions and cross-examination, death care
litigation, unfair business practices, business
litigation, settlement
issues and strategies,
construction defect
litigation, business torts, complex
litigation, electronic evidence, discovery, jury selection, the use of jury consultants and focus groups, employment law, trial of class actions and representative actions.
For building department
issue reviews, responses, or disputes, contact ADLI Law Group for the assistance of a leading
construction attorney that has endless experience with all
construction law and
litigation.
Represented board of managers as general counsel in matters involving management agreements, valet parking agreements, collection
issues, and defective
construction litigation.
Sarantos» practice focused on dispute resolution and
litigation relating to commercial
issues, labour and employment law, health law,
construction law, municipal law, products liability, personal injury, negligence, contractual and trust claims.
Representation of national
construction equipment company in a multi-million dollar asbestos
litigation involving successor liability and product identification
issues.
Among others, Mr. Ferdinand's experience includes, appellate
litigation; bankruptcy adversary proceedings; bid protests, debarments, and appeals; breach of contract and Uniform Commercial Code claims; broker disputes; commercial landlord - tenant actions, including commercial evictions; condominium association
litigation; consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices act claims; corporate governance; directors» and officers» claims; ethics and professional liability; health law; injunctions; insurance
issues; lien claims, including commercial and residential
construction liens; planning board actions; post-judgment collection; restrictive covenants; shareholder and partnership disputes; and shareholder derivative claims.
Representation of sureties in
litigation involving
construction issues, bond claims, and recovery from indemnitors.
Such
litigation has involved breach of contract, zoning compliance,
construction defect, foreclosure, homeowners» associations, or boundary disputes, among other
issues.
In addition, although the Gunn Court noted that state court interpretations of the Patent Act would not be binding on federal courts, [10] final state court judgments determining patent
issues, such as validity, infringement, or claim
construction, may well be binding on a patentee in subsequent
litigation involving the same or related patents.
He is an ardent litigator, serving as lead counsel in numerous civil jury trials involving medical - malpractice, contract disputes, defamation and related business torts, shareholder disputes (e.g., tortious interference with business relationship, trade secret, and non-compete violations), shareholder and LLC disputes and their fiduciary obligations, real - estate
litigation,
construction litigation, and creditors rights»
issues and related bankruptcy and receivership
issues.
Michael advises on a wide range of shipping, shipbuilding and offshore, international trade and commercial
litigation issues including charterparties, memoranda of agreement, shipbuilding and offshore
construction contracts, marine and commercial insurance, agency agreements, letters of credit and commercial notes.
Jon has experience in the drafting and negotiation of
construction agreements, procurement matters, tendering
issues,
construction insurance
issues and builders» liens as well as providing advocacy services for mediations, arbitrations, regulatory proceedings and
litigation.
Jack has over twenty years of experience in numerous types of commercial
litigation matters, with substantial representations of clients in many matters involving environmental
litigation, including five trials pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, significant architectural, engineering and
construction disputes, business acquisition and transactional disputes, including takeover / merger and acquisition
litigation, claims under purchase and sales and indemnity contracts, securities law
litigation, insurance coverage on behalf of the insured, and legal
issues relating to medical records release and copying.
He has considerable
litigation experience including matters involving
construction, industrial and technical
issues.
Mark Stefanini Qualified: 2006 Made partner: 2015 Key cases: Advised a Spanish real estate investment fund in relation to
litigation concerning breaches of loan documentation, material adverse change and
issues of delay and failure to provide information in relation to the
construction of a London hotel.
Construction law covers a wide range of
issues, such as real estate transactions and
litigation, contract law, consumer law and banking law.
Christopher is an experienced litigator, handling business disputes throughout South Florida in a wide range of
issues, including breach of contract,
construction litigation, real estate
litigation, business torts and insurance coverage.
He represents businesses, developers, and individuals involved in real estate
litigation, including
construction, land use, environmental
issues, insurance coverage actions, and collection of condominium fees.
The attorneys who collaborate have considerable experience in local government law
issues involving public finance, land use and zoning, eminent domain, infrastructure development, procurement, benefits and, employment and
construction litigation.
Litigation of title, ownership, boundary, easement, and restrictive covenant disputes; adverse possession claims; challenges to condominium development schemes involving phasing, land withdrawal, and affordable housing
issues; and condominium
construction defect cases.
Notable cases include Metall Market OOO v Vitorio Shipping, The «Lehmann Timber» (Court of Appeal); Global Process Systems v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia, The «Cendor MOPU» (Supreme Court); Commercial Court actions and arbitrations relating to the petrochemical industry, including offshore
construction and the
litigation arising from the Buncefield tank farm explosion; shipbuilding, ship finance and ship sale disputes; shipping and commodities cases, raising a diverse range of
issues relating to contracts of sale, bills of lading and Charterparties and Arbitration Act 1996 applications.
Jason represents individual and corporate clients on real estate purchase and sale transactions, commercial leasing, property management and landlord / tenant
issues,
construction contract disputes, misrepresentation and boundary
litigation.
In addition to his practice in the
construction and professional liability arenas, he counsels commercial clients on employment and labor
issues both in advance of and throughout
litigation.
We are a group of civil
litigation / trial attorneys who focus on
issues relating to insurance defense, insurance coverage, bad faith, insurance fraud, automobile liability,
construction litigation, business
litigation, motor carrier liability, premises liability, personal injury, and criminal
litigation.
Prior to joining Lewis Wagner, Meghan was an associate in the New York firm Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry's insurance coverage group, where she represented insurance company clients in insurance coverage
litigation, and advised insurers on exposure and liability
issues in wide array of tort and commercial contexts, including mass tort and class action
litigation involving pharmaceuticals, chemical, transportation, news and entertainment, and oil and gas; environmental suits; FDA compliance claims; unfair competition and false advertising claims; intellectual property claims;
construction defect; personal injury; product liability; and associated breach of contract claims.
Lindsay Kenney acts on behalf of local and international clients in relation to business disputes, fraud claims, partnership and shareholder disputes, in bankruptcy proceedings,
construction claims, employment
litigation, intellectual property
litigation, defamation claims, professional liability
issues, complex
litigation matters and other administrative and regulatory
issues, including appeals.
Also, Mark deals with disease
litigation particularly NIHL and HAVS claims and also
construction injury claims for a number of commercial clients where there is sub-contractor involvement / indemnity
issues.
David is a seasoned trial attorney with extensive experience handling a wide array of subject matters, including
construction disputes, commercial
litigation, insurance defense and coverage
issues, personal injury suits, and property damage suits.
Since its founding, Sacks Tierney has distinguished itself through a tradition of cause - related volunteerism and legal involvement in local and national
issues; the advancement to the bench by some of its members, including the late Carl Muecke and Robert Corcoran;
litigation services and experience competitive with much larger firms; and expertise in legal areas of special value in Arizona, including
construction law, healthcare law, Indian law and water law.
His experience includes product liability, commercial and business
litigation, real estate
litigation, insurance coverage disputes, personal injury defense, counseling on corporate and individual insurance claims
issues, mass tort
litigation, work site accidents, defense of premises liability claims, and
construction and building materials defects.
Mr. Hensley's
litigation experience is broad in nature, encompassing such diverse practice areas as: real estate
issues of almost any nature;
construction defect
litigation (both plaintiff and defense, representing developers, contractors, managers, subcontractors, and design professionals); federal and state securities class action / derivative defense; partnership / corporate governance
issues; UCC / commercial paper / letter of credit
issues; intellectual property / trade secret / unfair competition
issues; wrongful termination / harassment trials; wage / hour class action defense; contract formation and interpretation
issues; bankruptcy adversary proceedings; health care disputes; telecommunications
issues; and debtor / creditor financing
issues involving both secured and unsecured interests.
His leadership, knowledge, experience and thorough analysis have been very effective in resolving
construction disputes before
litigation because of his ability to explain complex design and
construction issues in a simple and clear manner.
This background, combined with my
construction law and
litigation and real estate knowledge, provides me with a unique skill set to handle a variety of
issues that arise in premises liability actions and with a unique ability to handle your case.
The firm's higher education services include: day - to - day academic, business and corporate matters; labor and employment; student discipline and affairs; NCAA compliance; tax matters (including tax - exempt
issues); real estate, financing and
construction; employee benefits;
litigation; higher education regulatory
issues; and health care.