In a recent decision, The Court of Appeal for Ontario clarified the circumstances under which
a constructive trust remedy will be granted in favour of victims of fraud once a fraudster enters bankruptcy proceedings.
Not exact matches
equitable
remedies including proprietary estoppel, resulting
trust and
constructive trust claims; and
In the even that you have missed the two limitation period, you still have an opportunity to pursue so called «equitable
remedies» such as «unjust enrichment» and «
constructive trusts».
A majority of the Court, disagreed, however, with the Ontario Court of Appeal's
remedy for that breach, finding that the imposition of a
constructive trust was not appropriate.
The majority of the Court generally agreed that Indalex had breached its fiduciary duty as plan administrator but that the
constructive trust imposed by the Ontario Court of Appeal was not the appropriate
remedy.
Did the Court of Appeal properly exercise its discretion in imposing a
constructive trust to
remedy the breaches of fiduciary duties?
A breach of fiduciary duty not only gives rise to a tort, it gives rise to special damages and
remedies that are unique to fiduciary cases apart from common economic loss damages, such as disgorgement of ill - gotten gains or a
constructive trust.
If the court is asked to grant such a
remedy and determines that a declaration of
constructive trust is warranted, then the proprietary interest awarded pursuant to that
remedy will be deemed to have arisen at the time when the unjust enrichment first occurred.»
He also has experience advising on the
trust law elements of commercial disputes, particularly on
constructive and resulting
trusts, following and tracing, and other equitable
remedies.
While the C.A. recognized that the imposition of a
constructive trust generally made the claimant the beneficial owner of the property, the trial judge had appropriately crafted a narrower
remedy (the C.A. also opined that an irrevocable licence was also an appropriate
remedy for proprietary estoppel).
The BC Court of Appeal in BNSF Railway v Teck Metals Ltd 2016 BCSC 350 the court delivered the following brief summary of the history of
constructive trust as an equitable
remedy:
This post discusses the finding by the Court of Appeal that it was inappropriate for the application judge to have granted a
constructive trust as a
remedy for breach of fiduciary duty.
In our earlier posts, we focused on the use of a
constructive trust as a
remedy for breach of fiduciary duty and third party fraud liability.
A
constructive trust is a
remedy available when «fraudulent, unfair, or unconscionable conduct causes [a party] to be unjustly enriched at the expense of another.»