Not exact matches
To help save this water, researchers at Sandia National Laboratories have developed a new silica filter for
power plant cooling waters that decreases the amount of freshwater
power plants consume by increasing the number of times cooling tower water can be reused and recycled.
A report
by Western Resource Advocates notes that «thermoelectric
power plants in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, and Utah
consumed an estimated 292 million gallons of water a day in 2005 - approximately equal to the water
consumed by Denver, Phoenix, and Albuquerque, combined.»
Indeed, Jacobson estimates that the opportunity costs of nuclear — the CO2 emissions that result from not using the resources
consumed by expanding nuclear to expand renewables and improve efficiency instead — exceed the total CO2 emissions from the entire nuclear
power plant lifecycle.
If you do that, you effectively replaced what you would have
consumed from conventional
power plants with electricity produced
by solar panels (or wind farms).
In contrast, fossil fuels can have a significant impact on water resources: both coal mining and natural gas drilling can pollute sources of drinking water, and all thermal
power plants, including those
powered by coal, gas, and oil, withdraw and
consume water for cooling.
If widely implemented, these scrubbers would
consume about one - third of the energy generated
by a
power plant and this would substantially drive up the price of electricity.
There are roughly 224 million of these boxes in use in America and together they
consume as much energy as produced
by four giant nuclear
power plants, running 24 hours a day.
Andreas Antonopoulos, for example, points out that bitcoin mining can be used to
consume the excess energy produced
by power plants «that would be otherwise wasted.»