It all started with on - disc DLC that made
consumers pay extra for something they technically already owned, which interestingly enough was pioneered by Capcom.
When
consumers pay extra for «organic» chicken and eggs, they believe that they are getting a product that is substantially different from conventional chicken and eggs.
Not exact matches
That across the board,
consumers are willing to
pay extra for one thing: sustainability.
The first is the question of whether
consumers will be willing to
pay extra for something they're already getting through their smartphones.
With 86 percent of
consumers willing to
pay a little
extra for a better in - flight experience, Alaska is on to a winner.
The survey found that 60 percent of Chinese
consumers are willing to
pay extra for American - made products.
Almost two - thirds of
consumers will
pay extra for a product that has a positive impact on the environment or is made through socially responsible means.
The problem is, the technology won't take off if
consumers are forced to
pay extra for it, so which of the existing parties is willing to take a smaller cut of the action in order to let newcomers in?
Consumers each
pay a few
extra dollars per year
for the sugar they consume, but this means millions of dollars
for a handful of domestic sugar producers.
«According to our market research,
consumers who are aware of the health benefits associated with DHA omega - 3 are willing to
pay extra for it.»
When
consumers are able, they are willing to
pay extra for the association of a quality product with a promise of security.
Growers and
consumers will not need to
pay more
for the
extra nutrition.
Since the current crop of LCVs still have question marks over their environmental cleanliness in the UK - related to their production methods and their dependence on unclean energy - there is little incentive to
consumers to
pay so much
extra for marginal gains.
More specifically, the 73 - page bill will remove the requirements of
consumers to
pay for the
extra costs included in providing clean electricity generation.
What I'd like to know is, taking all of these factors into account, how much
extra we, the
consumers, will have to
pay for a kilowatt - hour of coal - fired electricity 5, 10, 20 and 30 years from now (a point in time which even WV's own Nick Rahall says will be when the most productive coal seams have been mined out) because our leaders today decided to facilitate an increase in the consumption of coal through the laughably mis - named «climate bill.»
That means,
for a coal plant, we'd have to burn — and so
pay for — an
extra 10 - 40 % more coal with CCS than we would without it, and the electricity from that
extra energy / coal consumed is not available to
consumers for electricity.
Unlike free sites, with
pay sites you don't have the headache of endless advertising These are external links and will open in a new window
Consumers are no longer to be charged
extra for paying by debit or credit card, the
But features like this will likely be something
consumers will have to
pay extra for.
Consumers should only
pay extra for AWD if they regularly drive in snow or otherwise slippery conditions.
Consumers around the world are willing to
pay extra for image.
If we had to guess, it's an example of manufacturers looking to break through the usual 4 - 6 year model replacement cycle to get technology added to their vehicles as quickly as possible — and in Honda's case, perhaps testing the waters to see how many
consumers will
pay extra for it even on otherwise base models.
Shouldn't
consumers be willing to
pay a little
extra for that?
It doesn't matter that you're convinced that your book is so
extra special that you're sure the
consumer will
pay an
extra $ 10.00
for it.
If Apple's rise has taught us anything it is that the
consumer will
pay some premium
for something which has
extra perceived value.
So as per plan DataPlus,
consumers will have to
pay $ 25 per month and will be offered two gigabytes of data to play around with while any
extra usage will be charged at the rate of $ 10
for every gigabyte of data.
You personally might not mind
paying an
extra $ 20
for a decent product, but after working 4 years in retail environments (including Toys R Us and Radio Shack), I can assure you that is not the case with the majority of
consumers.
For consumers who pay for flights on their own credit card and expense it to their employer, this might be a great way to get extra rewards from flights you already need to ta
For consumers who
pay for flights on their own credit card and expense it to their employer, this might be a great way to get extra rewards from flights you already need to ta
for flights on their own credit card and expense it to their employer, this might be a great way to get
extra rewards from flights you already need to take.
For consumers who decide to
pay extra on their loan, be sure to read more about how to target payments to maximize your money.
While
consumers in general need a good credit score to ensure they don't
pay extra for utility services, car insurance premiums, and loan interest rates, bad credit can seriously affect the lives of those in the military.
«Lifetime withdrawal benefits» are very popular these days; most of the indexed or variable deferred annuities sold today are bought by
consumers who
paid extra for this «rider».
Before you start
paying extra on your mortgage, make sure you've 1)
paid off all other
consumer debt, 2) have at least a 3 - 6 month emergency fund, 3) begun investing in your retirement, and 4) saving
for your children's college
Before you even think about
paying extra on the mortgage I would
pay off all
consumer debt, have an emergency fund of 3 - 6 months of living expenses and set up a savings account
for the «You know about it» expenses.
In the end, Canadian
consumers don't end up
paying much
extra, but the rounding on cash transactions can mean big money
for grocery retailers across the country, with each store standing to collect $ 157 per year, Cheung said.
«I think both the retailer and the
consumer appreciate the «you get what you
pay for» concept and are willing to spend a few
extra dollars on a healthy alternative
for their companions,» he says.
The Cost of Quality But are
consumers willing to
pay top dollar
for «
extra special?»
Sustainable holidays are «nice to have» but not a «must»
for most
consumers around the world, and a majority of people remain unwilling to
pay extra for them.
While break - even values
for these cards are lower,
consumers seem to be willing to
pay a little
extra to get a non-travel specific rewards card.
So to the
consumer its like who needs to
pay an
extra $ 100
for 1X when PS4 is pushing out more impressive looking games.
This puts
consumers buying a Pro in a bit of a jam though... it means they are
paying extra for a box that really isn't going to show a difference
for the vast majority of games they play on it vs other platforms.
I subscribe to a «show your support
for a product by voting with your money» type of
consumer philosophy and I really do not want to support this practice of asking dedicated players to
pay an
extra $ 40
for 3 emotes, some shaders, and 3 exotic class items.
The original was released in a time where
consumers were given
extra little features on top of the game as a bonus, not as something to
pay for.
I honestly think the solution would be to cut the cartridge cost out of the digital price — i think
consumers, particularly Nintendo
consumers, are happy to
pay extra for a cartridge copy
for the tangibility of it.
Because
consumers really want to contribute to envrionment and
pay extra money
for it.
So far, only a tiny fraction of production forests have been so certified, and most
consumers have refused to
pay extra for «green» wood.
Ebico, a tiny supplier with Christian roots, charges all its customers the same price regardless of how they
pay, meaning that it uses the
extra income from direct debit customers to keep down prices
for pre-
pay and quarterly
consumers, who are generally the poorest.
For example, the report does not take into account the adverse economic impact resulting from the fact that consumers who must pay extra costs for their electricity will have less money to spend in Washington for food, clothing, housing, education, medical care, recreation and other purpos
For example, the report does not take into account the adverse economic impact resulting from the fact that
consumers who must
pay extra costs
for their electricity will have less money to spend in Washington for food, clothing, housing, education, medical care, recreation and other purpos
for their electricity will have less money to spend in Washington
for food, clothing, housing, education, medical care, recreation and other purpos
for food, clothing, housing, education, medical care, recreation and other purposes.
The
extra that
consumers pay for their power funds investment by power producers in alternative - energy sources such as hydropower, solar and wind.
And
consumers are increasingly starting to care about the life cycle of their gadgets, from factory floor to end - of - life recycling, and — as they have with organic food — those
consumers will
pay extra for more sustainable goods.
In light of these findings, the recommendations from the authors of the study are rather straightforward, and call
for consumers to
pay special attention to avoiding waste when buying and preparing meat products, and to minimize the negative environmental impacts of wasted food, «if
consumers choose to prepare
extra food «just in case,» they should use plant - based foods.»
The trade - off may be a higher price, but many
consumers are okay
paying for a little
extra peace of mind.