On the surface, it's not difficult to imagine that we could create a satisfying, culturally rich lifestyle while
consuming less fossil fuels and other nonrenewable resources.
This suits me just fine since I train in small sessions throughout the day and I can't be bothered with using the car to get to the gym all the time (As an added advantage
I consume less fossil fuel these days thus reducing the size of my carbon footprint on the planet.
Not exact matches
Then I tried the economic freedom line: «A carbon tax makes
fossil fuels more expensive, so people have an incentive to
consume less.
With generic solutions like «
consume less» and «vote better», the film mostly avoids controversy... though it does acknowledge the slick and well - funded «campaign of denial» by those who profit mightily from a
fossil -
fuel dependent world.
But in any event, we are now forced to
consume and spend
less because debt from now on is going to be harder to get, and we are also forced to use
less fossil fuels because they are already too expensive.
These sources of energy and efficiency technologies are in many cases cheaper than
fossils, have steep cost curves, produce a positive ROI for businesses and consumers, are anti-inflationary because they don't use a commodity
fuel or
consume less fuel, have the ability to decentralize and stabilize energy supply.
Nobody cares that you
consume more or
less fossil fuel.
Consume less, share more and stand up against
fossil fuels, urban sprawl, destructive infrastructures and resource extractivism.
This means that, while the world has been
consuming more
fossil fuels in the last couple of decades, the ratio of reserves - to - consumption has remained more or
less constant.
The amount of electricity generated in a power grid must always equal the amount being
consumed, so when wind turbines put power into a grid other generators, often
fossil -
fuelled, generate
less; so
less fossil fuels are burned.
It is also good (green) business and involves
consuming more
fossil fuels not
less.
Although solar (mainly PV) is the largest single energy source by that time, total carbon
consumed through
fossil fuel use amounts to 800 billion tonnes carbon by the end of the century, just a bit
less than current proven reserves (900 billion tonnes as indicated above).
However, while New York may
consume relatively
less fossil fuels than other American cities and may do a good job in providing clean water, it does a poor job of reducing, recycling and disposing of its waste.
A house that
consumes less energy reduces greenhouse gases because
less fossil fuel is required to operate it.