Not exact matches
These essays make no concession to «the modern mind,» but being intelligent and literate they present
liberal Jews with a bracing challenge» and Christians with a window on how classical Jewish
thought is applied to
contemporary problems.
But insofar as you do
think there are differences between rightly understood Locke and the
contemporary libertarian or classic
liberal reading of natural rights applied to economic issues, perhaps you will wind up defending at least part of my theory.
Administration rather than politics: this is, I
think, a widespread
contemporary ambition, and not just among
liberals.
The magazines move from the strongly traditional viewpoint of Moody Monthly (a viewpoint carrying on the social ethic of late nineteenth century American revivalism), through the moderately conservative stance of Christianity Today (a stance that seeks perhaps unconsciously to revive the social activism of American fundamentalism prior to the repeal of Prohibition and the Scopes trail), to the socially
liberal commitment of The Reformed Journal (a position seeking to be
contemporary, and yet faithful to Calvin's
thought) and the socially radical perspective of Sojourners (a perspective molded in the Anabaptist tradition).
Confronting neo-orthodoxy,
liberals reaffirmed the role of reason, the authority of universal human experience, and the insights of
contemporary modes of
thinking.
Basically - and I admit this is simplistic, but I'm not into writing a political text this morning -
liberals (in the
contemporary US sense) are about communalism and having the government take care of everyone, while conservatives
think the government should protect the country, and let individuals take...
sanbikinoraion: when I wrote the above I was
thinking about
liberal egalitarianism as a general philsophy and I had in mind what I see as the «big three» works of contemporary liberal egalitarianism: Rawls» A Theory of Justice, Dworkin's Sovereign Virtue and earlier, related essays, and Ackerman's Social Justice in the Liberal
liberal egalitarianism as a general philsophy and I had in mind what I see as the «big three» works of
contemporary liberal egalitarianism: Rawls» A Theory of Justice, Dworkin's Sovereign Virtue and earlier, related essays, and Ackerman's Social Justice in the Liberal
liberal egalitarianism: Rawls» A Theory of Justice, Dworkin's Sovereign Virtue and earlier, related essays, and Ackerman's Social Justice in the
LiberalLiberal State.
The
contemporary philosopher AC Grayling discusses education in the following way: «The aim of
liberal education is to produce people who go on learning after their formal education has ceased who
think, question, and know how to find answers when they need them.