Sentences with phrase «content rights holders»

Their platform is also built for content rights holders, allowing them to deliver their content through a simple - to - use, yet comprehensive and secure content rights management and analytics platform.

Not exact matches

On the one hand, the argument could be made that due to the nature of our content, a parody could tarnish the name of a rights holder.

Facebook will remove or restrict content that engages in copyright or trademark infringement after receiving a report from a rights holder or authorized representative.

Copyright law includes a concept known as «fair use,» which entitles anyone to use content without having to get the permission of the rights - holder, and without having to pay a licensing fee.

We live in a world where so many of the major rights holders push their video content available to all within seconds of goals going in.

They can interact on our private community message boards, take advantage of program pass holder discounts, share content across a variety of social networks, and even purchase or renew their program pass — all right in the palm of their hand.

Copyright is a hotly contested issue facing both authors and the publishing industry, as rights holders work to strike a balance between safeguarding content and sharing it across a variety of platforms to reach as many readers as possible.

Aptara has a 25 year history of helping content providers and rights holders with their digitization needs, essentially working with the complete, ready - to - go file and transforming it into their final publishing project.

Amazon launched its Kindle Worlds fan fiction platform just over a year ago, and the concept has been a great success for both the rights holders who license content to the site and the fans who adore the concepts and story lines of their favorite authors.

Even more beneficial to libraries, patrons, and rights holders, the company also works in retailing digital content, allowing patrons to purchase titles from names like comic and graphic novel platform Comics Plus and CoverCake, an analytics tool that helps drive vertical engagement through its in - app book discovery tool.

Digital rights management (DRM) is a class of controversial technologies that are used by hardware manufacturers, publishers, copyright holders, and individuals with the intent to control the use of digital content and devices after sale; there are, however, many competing definitions.

This print partnership will secure access for consumers who prefer physical books, and allow rights holders to order large quantities of their content for a variety of purposes.

In this instance, pre-approved refers to the licensing and cooperation of the rights» holder of the original content that sparked the fan fiction.

In the licensed fan fiction model established by Kindle Worlds, rights holders for licensed books, movies, or television shows allow their content to be used for the inspiration for works that can later be published on the platform for royalties.

These publisher partnerships help ensure that the rights holders are duly compensated through the lending program while still offering content that libraries can feel confident investing in for their readers.

«It shows that digital services can provide innovative means to discover content while still respecting the rights of copyright - holders.»

Non-exclusivity and rights holder control over content is an incredibly important guiding principle here at Findaway Voices.

They will be trying new books as rights holders come forward to join the experiment — perhaps poets or authors of books related to this year's election, or nonprofits with great content to release in return for reasonable crowd - funded compensation.

If rights holders are going to provide digital content, they need license agreements enforced by digital rights management (DRM) technologies that will limit the risk.

We should try out new business models in our dealings with rights holders: Buy directly from rights holders, including authors; host your own ebook content; or offer library users the choice of purchasing ebooks through the library catalog when the waitlist is too long.

By submitting Contributed Material to the PetSmart Charities Pet Community and similar service Sites, you agree that you are the sole owner and copyright and / or other intellectual property holder of photos, videos, stories, and and other content or information you submit (or otherwise have all necessary rights to contribute, submit and permit the unrestricted use thereof by PetSmart Charities); that these Contributed Materials do not infringe any intellectual property rights of any individual or entity, including for example the photographer who took the photos and / or videos you have submitted, or the person (s) described in any testimonial or story; and that these Contributed Materials do not contain any material or information that otherwise violates any criminal prohibition.

You may upload to any Interactive Area or otherwise transmit, post, publish, reproduce or distribute, on or through the Slow Travel Classifieds only Content that is not subject to any Intellectual Property Rights, or Content in which any holder of Intellectual Property Rights has given express authorization for distribution over the Internet and on the Slow Travel Classifieds, without restriction whatsoever.

Be it an unfavorable end - user license agreement (EULA) or digital rights management (DRM), corporate entities have endeavored to convey that consumers do not own digital content, but rather license the content for an indeterminate period of time, during which the rights holder can terminate said license with impunity.

About Funimation Funimation is the # 1 English - language anime content provider in North America, which licenses, adapts and distributes anime content from Japanese rights holders internationally.

Everyone should be patient and chill; it's quite possible this announcement will have taken some rights holders by surprise; I'm hopeful by the end of the year we'll have more content than we know what to do with!

However, please bear in mind that the rights holders and YouTube reserve the right to block or remove this content without notice.

With respect to the right to use content, for example, he writes: «The concept of fair use needs to be updated and clarified, while still balancing the fundamental right of copyright holders to profit from their creations.»

«Our negotiators consulted closely throughout the process, with US stakeholders including intellectual property rights holders, print - disabled individuals, libraries, and other organizations that play a vital role in distributing copies [of content] in accessible formats.

From my (Very uneducated) understanding, this means that I am still the copyright holder of the (unique) content that I have posted, but the forum has the full rights to display the content, which is a right I can not revoke.

As a reminder, in that case the Court had ruled that links directing to content, which has been uploaded with the consent of the right holder, do constitute a communication, but not to a new public.

The second set of questions inquires whether the streaming of content that has been made available without the consent of a right holder constitutes an «unlawful use» within the meaning of Article 5 (1)(b) of the InfoSoc Directive and whether such uses of works fall foul of the three - step test of Article 5 (5).

(para. 50) This means in turn that users who post links as part of their economic activities are presumed to have ascertained whether the linked content has been made available with the consent of the right holder.

The answer to these questions closes a systematic gap that had been left after the judgments in Svensson and BestWater, which both related to content which had been made available with the consent of the right holder.

«Proposed technical measures to be discussed by ISPs, rights holders and Ofcom, such as filtering and marking content to help identify legitimate content, could be effective solutions.

Users who post links to «illegal» content that do so without an economic motivation do not make an act of communication to the public if they can not reasonably know that the content has been uploaded without permission from the right holder.

But the Court argued that both earlier judgments, which established the legality of linking to and framing of content which has been made available with the consent of the right holder, merely underline the importance of the right holder's consent for the legality of such references.

Accordingly, links to freely available content that has been posted without the consent of the right holder could constitute an (infringing) act of communication to the public if they have been posted to content which has been made available without the consent of the right holder.

In its judgment on 26 April the CJEU extends the scope of the right of communication to the public under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive (Directive 2001 / 29 / EC), which grants a right holder the exclusive right to communicate a work or a related right to the public, to cover the sale of devices which contain pre-installed software that provides its users with links to unlawful streaming content.

However, according to the Court, this does not automatically mean that links to content which is freely available on the Internet, but has been made available without the consent of the right holder, do not constitute a communication to a new public.

The most controversial sources are unauthorized streaming websites that offer free content without permission of the rights holder.

«Say what you like, it's hard to deny that this is actively defrauding the copyright holders and if you had just bid hundreds of millions for the broadcast and later Internet rights to a major event how would YOU work to defend those rights and ensure that you could later monetize that content -LSB-...] Maybe the letter from Baker & McKenzie was the legal equivalent of a bull in the proverbial china shop, but I am just plain disappointed that the Boing Boing people have returned fire with its daft threats back to the law firm: «Baker & McKenzie, be on alert: henceforth, Boing Boing will be actively monitoring your website to identify dumbass activity and will, if necessary, take appropriate action to point out instances of wasting clients» money by sending out unnecessary and obnoxious warning letters.»

Rightscorp's aim is to encourage rights holders to hold ISPs accountable for repeat infringement of their content by seeking termination of repeat infringers.

Digital content is, or should be, distributed under some license (a contract between you and the rights holder), otherwise it is illegal to receive or use the work.

Once the readings are purchased by the students, Access Copyright collects payment for the content and distributes the royalties back to the rights holders.

The two parties have gone at in court ever since, resulting last year in the appellate opinion finding that a rights» holder must make «a good faith inquiry» as to whether content would qualify under the Copyright Act's fair use exception before requesting a take - down.

«The challenge is Facebook has many users — if you're a smaller rights holder and you have content that's popular, it could be tough to keep track of that.»

The streaming libraries of services like Amazon, Netflix, and Hulu are in constant flux, generally shrinking as rights - holders gather as much content as they can into their own collections.

YouTube Red will split subscription revenue with the rights holders of content people consume through the service.

That kind of behavior may scare rights holders, but Vevo's success and Google's monetization of fan - made content have both demonstrated there's money to be made in music videos — and mashups like Musicvideogenome.com could play a big role in this type of monetization in years to come.

The Group depends on securing content licenses from a number of major and minor content owners and other rights holders in order to provide its service.