Furthermore, even the identification of the putative
content of experience proves to be normed by whatever hermeneutical analysis is employed, for one can only imagine, much less recognize as present, what one can come to identify somehow.16 Finally, some hermeneutical analysis is also presupposed by and, therefore, normative of any
argument from experience, whether of the individual or the communal
type, since it is only experience as interpretable in terms of some description or other to which one can ever appeal either for the mutual corroboration of such descriptions or for their illustration of a theistic interpretation.
So at the ending of the day I don't really believe that anyone needs to prove or give any
type of evidence that games many times are not violent because I don't really believe that the
argument nearly even needs to be about the violence and games as much as it's about that we already have a rating system for that
type of
content in the first place.
Lynn, I find the best
argument against any of the «pause, hiatus,»
types is to show a graph of ocean heat
content — like NOAA's.0 to 700m or 0 to 2000 m OHC products