@Chad, «misguided Christians and atheists seizing on out of
context biblical passages do nt really make a huge impression on me»
= > misguided Christians and atheists seizing on out of
context biblical passages do nt really make a huge impression on me
Not exact matches
This section will look at the surrounding
context of Genesis 6 - 8, and subsequent sections will consider other
biblical passages that deal with the flood.
Reading familiar
biblical passages in their
context is sometimes startling.
I utterly reject
Biblical inerrancy http://lotharlorraine.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/on-the-inspiration-of-the-bible-and-other-books-von-der-interpretation-der-bibel-und-anderen-buchern/ but find it interesting that this view of the afterlife is the most likely interpretation of the
passages, provided one consider the Old Testament imagery in its own
context.
Instinctively we take this view we have been taught and project it onto the
biblical passages rather then letting Scripture speak for itself in its own
context.
But in the
context of Deuteronomy, the
biblical passage reflects a revolutionary program of centralized and perhaps domesticated religious authority.
However, to suggest that those
passages suggest homosexual relationships, is the face of numerous
biblical contexts denouncing homosexuality, is impossible to deduce exegetically.
If I quote a small
biblical passage, then I get accused of taking it out of
context.
Drawing from the work of
biblical scholars, most notably James Brownson, Matthew looks at the
context, language, and historical background of these
passages to conclude that the Bible does not directly address the issue of same - sex orientation or the expression of that orientation.
In fact, for fundamentalists the
biblical book qua book does not really exist; rather, the Bible is an unsystematic anthology of individual verses or short
passages that are unrelated to their
Contexts and to the larger works in which they are embedded.
Whatever the precise date of this
passage from Jeremiah's prophecies — and, as is usually the case,
biblical scholars disagree — the general historical
context is clear: More than a century earlier the northern kingdom of Israel had been almost entirely annihilated by the Assyrians.
@stevie 7 The
biblical definition of a fool is not the English word stupid.The Bible defines fool as someone who has lied to themselves by saying there is no God.In a paraphrase of the brief, out of
context passage you reference, one could say, professing themselves to be wise, they became atheists.Which one could agree is extremely stupid.