It's also interesting to see the comparisons to Schrader's script for Taxi Driver, and how that's being realized in
the context of a man of faith wrestling with the darkness of humanity.
Not exact matches
There continues to be much to learn from Kierkegaard, a
man who not only arrived at a radical and dialectical understanding
of faith, but who did so in the
context of the advent
of a world that is totally profane.
It deals with Christology and the doctrine
of God, as well as prayer, the resurrection, heaven, etc. and it provides a general introduction to Whitehead's thought.128 The Task
of Philosophical Theology by C. J. Curtis, a Lutheran theologian, is a process exposition
of numerous «theological notions» important to the «conservative, traditional» Christian viewpoint.129 Two very fine semi-popular introductions to process philosophy as a
context for Christian theology are The Creative Advance by E. H. Peters130 and Process Thought and Christian
Faith by Norman Pittenger.131 The latter, reflecting the concerns
of a theologian, provides a concise introduction to the process view
of God together with briefer comments on
man, Christ, and «eternal life.»
Instead
of believing with Hartshorne that
man's convictions about the ultimate character
of reality can and should be determined by allegedly neutral logical principles, the understanding here being argued is that
man's thinking about God is and should be governed by a vision emerging in the
context of faith, a vision that is itself decisively conditioned by its rootage in history and in the prereflective levels
of consciousness.
This is such a huge subject that I must beg indulgence, therefore, if I give my space to but a small fraction
of the historic
faith — namely its main emphases on God, Christ, the Church, and eternal life — and consider only these in our modem
context, in the effort to discover what values they may have for
men and women who are tossed about in an unsettled world, with an uncertain future, and doomed — almost certainly it seems — to a doubtful truce
of arms, at worst to a war which threatens to annihilate
man as we have known him and in any event to leave us a bare existence such as we can eke out on a totally devastated planet.
In the
context of Christian theology, the problem
of faith and reason asks this question: What is the relation between the certitude that God enters into a saving relationship with
man (most effectively and uniquely in the historical existence
of Jesus
of Nazareth) and those certitudes that seem to spring from
man's commonly held ability to abstract and verify the forms
of events and processes in the world?
The
context for the entire treatment will be a consistent and coherent worldview that in my belief is appropriate to the Christian tradition
of faith, worship, and life and that at the same time can make sense to
men and women today in their desire for a meaningful interpretation
of their existence,
of the world in which that existence is found, and
of the divine reality we call God.
Wherever and whenever
men and women began the journey
of faith it was always in the
context of the mission already in progress.
In that church a «fundamentalist» was one who believed not just in the «fundamentals»
of the
faith, but also in a cultural
context that meant flat - top haircuts for
men, koolots for women (if you don't know what those are, just rest in the ignorance), exclusive southern gospel quartet psalmnody, and a dispensationalist, separatist, KJV - only identity.
It's especially absurd in
context, given that the person on the receiving end
of that question is a
man of science — an overt skeptic
of all matters
of faith.