When these issues are raised in
the context of law students and legal education, I have to laugh.
Not exact matches
For example, ESSA only slightly broadens the focus from test scores, does nothing to confront Campbell's
Law, * doesn't allow for reasonable variations among
students, doesn't take
context into account, doesn't make use
of professional judgment, and largely or entirely (depending on the choices states» departments
of education make) continues to exclude the quality
of educators» practice from the mandated accountability system.
Particularly in the
context of ESSA, which has returned significant flexibility to States and local districts, programs like the RELs are critical to ensuring that States and districts have the resources to design and implement evidence - based practices and interventions responsive to
student needs that the
law calls for.
While public schools can teach
students about religion in a civic or historical
context, it's against the
law for public school educators to teach the tenets
of any one religion.
The actual text
of the
law mentions multi-tiered systems
of support only briefly, and in the
context of helping
students with disabilities and English - language learners have access to the challenging academic standards.
Students studying at Yale University, Cornell University
of USA are subjected to write essays on many topics which comprise
of Law Essays, Marketing Essays, Management Essays, Corporate Essays and English Essays which requires a lot
of vocabulary and
context.
Best Practices for Legal Education, published by the Clinical Legal Education Association fifteen years later, in 2007, essentially reiterated the message
of the MacCrate Report.57 Best Practices argued that to become effective practicing lawyers,
students must have opportunities during
law school to engage in legal problem - solving activities, either in hypothetical situations or real legal
contexts.58 The MacCrate Report set out principles
law schools should apply to achieve excellence in legal education.
By integrating writing and doctrine in the first semester, we are sending a message to our
students, at outset
of their legal education, that there is no real divide between analyzing legal doctrine and the writing that communicates that analysis.54 By writing within a doctrinal
context,
students are able to see the ways in which the
law and how it is structured influence their writing choices.55 Moreover,
students tend to develop a deeper understanding
of the connected doctrinal course because
of the writing that occurs in that doctrinal area.56 Thus a number
of the benefits that result from integrating the two courses arise from the synergies that come from teaching both courses together.57 What follows are some specific synergies that I have observed in teaching the integrated LA&W and Introduction to Torts courses.
The «how - to» materials will assist legal writers in improving their organization and legal analysis skills.14 The more theoretical works can be helpful in judicial process courses and seminars for
law students and judges.15 Writings that explain the workings
of chambers provide the
context in which opinions are written and are useful for current externs, future and new clerks, and new judges.16
This relatively short theoretical piece, written for all
students of the
law, asks foundational questions about the purposes
of written opinions that will provide
context for the three goals
of a judicial opinion writing course and assure the
students that learning about writing judicial opinions matters.
All
of our writing assignments are based on the substantive
law of Torts.39 In addition to the cases that
students use directly for their writing assignments, they will often read Torts cases from their casebook that are connected to (and thus give an important
context for) the area they are writing about.
Like the three reports discussed above, and, in fact, drawing heavily on those reports, the curricular change literature generally takes the position that the case - dialogue method
of pedagogy does not sufficiently prepare
law students to become practicing lawyers.74 While
students learn basic case analysis skills through this method, they are usually not explicitly taught how to integrate those skills into a larger set
of lawyering skills, in particular those identified as fundamental in the MacCrate Report.75 Further, while reading and analyzing cases, the focus
of most
law school classes, are important lawyering skills, they represent only a small portion
of what lawyers actually do.76 Consequently, these commentators advocate for teaching legal skills as they are used in their real - world
context, not merely as abstract ideas, and for integrating theoretical analysis and practical skills.77
Early statistics from some
of the UK's largest
law firms suggest
students from disadvantaged backgrounds are up to 50 % more likely to be hired by firms when they are able to consider their performance in the
context of their background.
It is caused by at least three other factors: (i) almost every problem
law students encounter in
law school comes labelled either by the course or by the assigned moot topic; few
students ever have to deal with a simple cry for help from a client; (ii) in my experience at
law schools — and it may be different now — almost all research was done in the
context of litigation or moots and, while that's obviously an important focus, it's not the only one; and, perhaps the most important factor, (iii) the lawyers who give the
students work far too often ask the
student to «find a case» — this is almost universal focus
of litigators — and are uninterested in either
context or principle.
If you are running an organized program to help improve new lawyers or
law students, and your advice will be given in the formal
context of mock trials or appellate arguments, that's different.
The Report's central conclusion is that, although traditional legal pedagogy is very effective in certain aspects, it overemphasizes legal theory and underemphasizes practical skills and professional development.5 By focusing on theory in the abstract setting
of the classroom, the Report argues, traditional legal education undermines the ethical foundations
of law students and fails to prepare them adequately for actual practice.6 Traditional legal education is effective in teaching
students to «think like lawyers,» but needs significant improvement in teaching them to function as ethical and responsible professionals after
law school.7 As I will discuss in greater detail below, in general, the Report recommends «contextualizing» and «humanizing» legal education by integrating clinical and professional responsibility courses into the traditional core curriculum.8 In this way,
students will learn to think like lawyers in the concrete setting
of actual cases and clients.9 The Report refers to pedagogical theories developed in other educational settings and argues that these theories show that teaching legal theory in the
context of practice will not only better prepare
students to be lawyers, it will also foster development
of a greater and more deeply felt sense
of ethical and professional identity.10
Opening the door to the world
of international and foreign
law in the
context of first - year legal research and writing will help our
students recognize and prepare to work effectively in the global legal practice that awaits them.
We are convinced
of the value
of opening this door so that
students begin to see international and comparative
law as part
of their
context as lawyers, instead
of viewing these sources as something literally alien and reserved only for experts.92
In my own research on legal education, I demonstrated that a key shortcoming
of the traditional intellectual apprenticeship lies precisely when
students start to think about the
contexts of law cases in complicated ways.
This proximity
of content and
context, especially when combined with an administrative structure in which the library reports to the Dean
of Law rather than to the central university library, allows for a level
of integration
of professional service, research support and institutional strategy among the library, faculty and
students that is the envy
of other disciplines.
For example, an analysis
of this concept in the
context of random drug testing
of students engaged in extracurricular activities where the school's common
law authority is balanced against constitutional concerns about privacy under the 4th Amendment is found in the U.S. Supreme Court case Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 (1995).
A Flex Time cohort may involve the greatest costs, given the administrative complexity
of managing admissions and course requirements within a Flex Time cohort
context, and the additional
student services, library services, clinical education offerings, and other customization
of the
Law School experience to a Flex Time model (e.g. moots, pro bono or public interest placements, exchanges,
student clubs and associations, etc).
This is particularly problematic in the
context of students graduating with ever - increasing
law school debt: as
students look to make crucial career decisions while graduating, the added — and somewhat unexpected — weight
of almost $ 5,000 in licensing fees has a disproportionate impact on shaping legal career paths.
Given that 80 %
of law students rely on
student loans, employment and salary data placed in the
context of student loans indebtedness would have broad usefulness.
Human Rights Clinic
students are deeply engaged in the practice
of law in the international and cross-cultural
context of human rights litigation and advocacy at the local, national, and international levels.
The Centre
of Excellence for International Courts (iCourts) and PluriCourts — Centre for the Study
of the Legitimate Roles
of the Judiciary in the Global Order is hosting a high - level summer school for PhD
students working on international
law and with a special interest in interdisciplinary studies
of international
law and its social and political
context.
The Human Rights Clinic exposes
students to the practice
of law in the international and cross-cultural
context of human rights litigation and advocacy.
Outside the
law school
context, writing center scholars have long debated whether generalist tutors (those that are not expert, or even conversant, in the writer's subject matter) can provide the right amount
of feedback.105 Some believe generalist tutors are the ideal, because «the ignorant tutor, by virtue
of her ignorance, is just as likely — perhaps even more likely — than the expert to help the
student recognize what must be stated in the text.»
Students interested in acting as in - house counsel to First Nations governments, or providing governance advice to First Nations from the
context of a private firm, should consider additional advanced elements
of administrative
law.
This is a webinar that we delivered for a
law school client to help
students develop a deeper understanding
of the practical
context in which
law operates.
The LLM in International Human Rights
Law provides
students with a comprehensive insight into the legalframework
of human rights protection, and engages
students in the practice and policy
context of human rights.
Students chose from a range
of modules, including Refugee Protection, International Criminal Justice, Gender and
Law, International Humanitarian
Law, Migration
Law and Trafficking, Business and Human Rights, European Human Rights
Law, Children's Rights, Counter-terrorism.
We expect our articling
students to continue their formal education within the
context of the
law firm environment, and to become exposed to the widest possible range
of legal subject matters, various alternatives for dispute resolution, appropriate business practices, and ethical standards.
She's focused on
students» strategic exploration
of the diverse
contexts in which lawyers work, their understanding
of different definitions
of success and «fit,» and their development
of a set
of essential professional skills not typically taught in
law school, such as self - awareness, team collaboration, and professional communication.
45 Cf. Sinsheimer & Herring, supra note 2, at 123 (recommending, based on three - year observational study
of law - firm associates, that «[l] egal educators should consider developing exercises that require
students to compose emails in various
contexts»); Wawrose, supra note 14, at 547 («One
of the major structural changes to the first - year LRW syllabus our research suggests is the inclusion
of short research and writing assignments to supplement the traditional memo and brief assignments often used in first - year LRW classes.»).
Students work with Municipal Government Solicitors or City
Law Directors on civil litigation and criminal litigation issues arising within the
context of a municipal government.
She has a broad understanding
of the changing
contexts of legal education and
law schools, and is deeply committed to seizing the opportunity before the Schulich School of Law to take the lead in curriculum reform, to increase its scholarly impact, to cultivate the professional legal community and to encourage students to work in the public intere
law schools, and is deeply committed to seizing the opportunity before the Schulich School
of Law to take the lead in curriculum reform, to increase its scholarly impact, to cultivate the professional legal community and to encourage students to work in the public intere
Law to take the lead in curriculum reform, to increase its scholarly impact, to cultivate the professional legal community and to encourage
students to work in the public interest.
The growing focus on mental health and wellness, for example, though new measures such as JustBalance, may have important and beneficial impacts on the kind
of lawyers these
law students will be, and how they respond to clients and colleagues with mental health issues and the mental health
contexts in the justice system more broadly.
To provide
context for the discussion,
students were asked to read a paper by John H. Langbein on the historical foundation
of the
law of evidence, as well as the recent Canadian Bar Association report, Reaching Equal Justice: An Invitation To Envision And Act.
Investigating the impact
of advocacy by
law students at CLASSIC in the
context of housing
law hearings
The Centre
of Excellence for International Courts (iCourts) and PluriCourts — Centre for the Study
of the Legitimate Roles
of the Judiciary in the Global Order is also hosting a high - level summer school for PhD
students and junior scholars working on international
law and with a special interest in interdisciplinary studies
of international
law and its social and political
context.
«On the pedagogical side, we really think corporate
law is an ideal course for many
students in second term
of first year because they get a chance to integrate concepts
of a number
of other courses they've taken in first term, and they get to do that in the
context of a field where both statutes and judicial decision - making — case
law — are important.
Although the
context in which this topic arises for me is province - specific, I know from conversations with young lawyers and
law students from across Canada that
law firm orientation programs, or rather oftentimes the lack thereof, should be a topic
of significant interest for lawyers in many parts
of the country.
It has provided
students - at -
law with an opportunity to experience and learn about the practice
of law in a relatively risk free
context of supervised
law firm placement.
Those
of us who carry out legal research or provide legal research instruction as a regular part
of our livelihoods or occupations often think
of legal research in what I think
of as a more traditional
context: the private
law firms, the corporate legal department, the government (i.e., justice departments), the courts (i.e., by court counsel and
students / clerks), the
law school (by or for
students and professors).
Of course, that very question has preoccupied lawyers and legal scholars alike for two decades with regard to IT law, i.e. whether it should be treated as a subject in and of itself (in which case it usually isn't a mandatory class, meaning that students can go through law school without hearing the word «Internet» in a legal context), or if the digital medium should simply be addressed in basic textbooks and general courses and classe
Of course, that very question has preoccupied lawyers and legal scholars alike for two decades with regard to IT
law, i.e. whether it should be treated as a subject in and
of itself (in which case it usually isn't a mandatory class, meaning that students can go through law school without hearing the word «Internet» in a legal context), or if the digital medium should simply be addressed in basic textbooks and general courses and classe
of itself (in which case it usually isn't a mandatory class, meaning that
students can go through
law school without hearing the word «Internet» in a legal
context), or if the digital medium should simply be addressed in basic textbooks and general courses and classes.
However, in this section I argue that if clinical
law students and lawyers fail to critically interrogate our emotional responses in these
contexts, we may unwittingly assume that our responses
of outrage are sufficient «gauges»
of injustice and that our feelings legitimate certain responses on the part
of legal professionals.
In clinical
law contexts, pedagogies focused on critical analysis
of emotional responses must recognize that
law students are constantly contending with dominant discourses and understandings about the role
of emotions in
law and legal practice.
Because
of the dominant negative approach to overt expressions
of emotions in legal education
contexts, many
law students may understand reactions
of moral outrage as being upsetting, unprofessional, and «outside» the bounds
of the legal realm in which they are operating.
Emotional intelligence is a key aspect
of legal work in clinical
contexts, they write, and therefore clinical
law supervisors must focus on showing
students how to attend to the affective dimensions
of the lawyer client relationship.