Context of this thread started with Colin calling me dishonest for describing what I THOUGHT another poster said.
I don't believe he is fully aware of the true
context of the thread.
In
the context of this thread, it is well worth reading.
The context of the thread for # 275 is consideration of those who * refuse * to consider it in a reasonably objective manner, of whom there are sadly many examples.
And while not topical in
the context of this thread, and while this is an oldish paper, his conclusions re the effects of CO2 are interesting, tho perhaps not as interesting as his conclusions with respect to water vapour forcings and the GHE of CFCs and HCFCs...
In
the context of this thread, I don't see a relevant meaning for what you wrote other than the implication I took from it.
Not exact matches
At the same time, by explaining your value proposition, you make it easy for your recipient to understand the
context of the email without having to read through the other previous outreach and follow up emails in the
thread.
You started hostile posts against me, by pulling my quotes out
of context from the conversation I was having and starting new
threads with my quote as the topic.
but the
context / juice
of this
thread are pain - filled anecdotes from Julie's experience
of her divorce used to accuse EV leaders
of abuse.
Van, a fair amount
of coinciding testimony and historical
context has been put into this
thread.
Constantly starting new
threads by talking another poster's words out
of context is disingenuous.
It is at the same time a conceptual tool, a way
of thinking, an alternative to the linear chaining
of events torn from their multi-leveled
context — like a
thread extracted from a Persian carpet and suspended in a vacuum.
Why would you start a new
thread with that post
of mine and not reply on the p 100
thread where it could be seen in
context?
Speaking at the Automation Perspectives conference, Frank Kulaszewicz, senior VP, Architecture & Software Division, Rockwell Automation, set out his vision
of the digitally transformed enterprise, whose digital information
thread provides
context and critical insights enabling action to improve performance.
Blog
threads not being representative was a point I recently made in the
context of support for David Cameron.
The email must add to the discussion; i.e., it must provide information /
context to the discussion on that
thread not already covered prior to this, nor itself also not available via link to peer - reviewed, published literature (no anecdotal reposting
of the science)
Not sure what type
of cancer, but in
context with this
thread, if he avoided phytates or phytic acid, he may have downplayed the BENEFITS they showed towards colon cancer.
A common
thread however has been the sheer lack
of local engagement within the conflict
context.
Featured in this show is a recent
threads of inquiry that explores the public perception
of surveillance in conjunction with the modern theater
of war within the
context of the airshow.
The idea
of isolating an action from its
context results in the conception
of a series
of «machine - like objects,» which perform «non-practical» actions (as opposed to what a machine would usually do): a machine that smokes cigarettes, a machine that tries to
thread a needle, a machine that cries, etc..
The
thread and ink
of his canvases are imbued with a complex ambiguity that pushes the images beyond any definitive cultural
context.
You have offered this new
thread, presumably, in the
context of the debate about how much transparency should be offered re.
Seriously, I just checked in on this
thread, and I'm glad to see that the authors recognize the implications
of «precautionary policy» in the
context of this kind
of uncertainty.
You seem to be making a strawman point — this
thread is about John Kehr's use
of GISP2 to indicate that the last 30 years has not been abnormal, and to consider that point we really need to see the last 30 years in
context — which we can not do for satellite data starting in 1979...
I did google the term when this
thread first started, and found about 13 different definitions
of the term, depending on the
context in which it was being used — statistical, financial, etc..
I view history as a single continous golden
thread connecting up random events that otherwise we couldnt undertsand if viewed in isolation and out
of context.
My own confidence assessment (provided on the Doubt
thread in the
context of the Italian flag) was derived from contingent reasoning.
«The issue
of the mid century temperature bump was raised on a previous
thread by Girma in the
context of an email he sent to Kevin Trenberth (some excerpts provided below):»
Lets frame belief, disbelief, and doubt in the
context of the Italian flag, that was introduced previously on the hurricane
thread:
Lets frame belief, disbelief, and doubt in the
context of the Italian flag, that was introduced previously on the hurricane
thread in which evidence for a hypothesis is represented as green, evidence against is represented as red, and the white area reflecting uncommitted belief that can be associated with uncertainty in evidence or unknowns.
The Place - based Education and Local Outdoor Learning
thread weaves together emergent research and practice from these two fields, inviting specific consideration
of time spent outdoors (TSO) in relation to in - / non - and formal learning
contexts, local curricular mandates, teacher education and professional development, health and wellbeing, ethics, pedagogy, and more.
Except that it does not make sense, especially in the
context of the subject
of this
thread, slowing sea level rise.
Whereas Lindzen is given no such benefit
of the doubt (see the later
thread on Lindzen's testimony) and taken out
of context, for example on the faint sun paradox where Chris Colose and Jim D just misquote him.
I don't recall what I wrote previously, and rather than dig through very old
threads I'll just go with the
context of this particular discussion.
Your resposted comment on the old
thread at http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?p=4&t=159&&n=653#82762 is in fact out
of context there, since it is based on a quote from the new
thread.
It will help them to understand the
context of your comments on this
thread.
It is instructive to read the Real Climate comment
thread in the
context of scientists that actually know the discipline inside - and - out, unlike the low - information skeptics who reside here.
In a Canadian
context, the common
thread for all four is their association with Tom Harris's various projects: Friends
of Science, Natural Resources Project and the International Climate Science Coalitions, plus various petitions (much
of this covered previously here).
I rarey agree wth a word he says but he expresses himself politely and with considerable attempts at science.I think your comment is rather over the top and seems to be an unwelcome extension
of the current vogue
of you and Mosh hurling insults at each other - mostly unfounded it seems, as the
context (or a reply) is often missed in these often confusing
threads.
It's important that anyone reading this
thread understands the
context of what Garth's study and what it has shown.
It is a technique that I have seen contrarians use before on
threads — barge in making ridiculous claims, then sane and rational people get frustrated and then you cut and paste their comments out
of context and say — see how mean tow «extremists» are.
Since the topic
of the
thread is Ocean Heat Content Uncertainties, in the
context of OHC as a proxy for globalclimatewarmingchange, I would have thought it was obvious I was speaking
of «close» in the sense
of giving sufficiently precise and accurate measurements to determine the central issue in this debate.
The remarkable episode
of Gavin, International Man
of Mystery, plagiarizing a small point on a CA
thread arose in the
context of Steig et al..
The motions judge had done an excellent job
of putting the insults in
context (namely
of a back - and - forth
thread of mutual nasty comments), showing that the barb was (a) less serious and (b) effectively rebutted immediately.
Facebook has provided features such as score - based leaderboards, in -
context chat and group
thread conversations to give a pinch
of its social networking flavour.
A couple
of days ago I noticed a
thread on our forum asking how to add Control Panel to the desktop
context menu, so I decided to write up the solution for everybody, since it seems like a really useful hack.
So many folks will jump on a
thread and act like they are the first person to comment, which puts some
of the statements out
of context.