Sentences with phrase «context quotes do»

Not exact matches

While I definitely feel that these six short words are the gist of great wisdom, I would be remiss if I didn't include some other inspirational Michelle Obama quotes to give them context.

Don't get swayed by the misinformation out there and quotes taken out of context.

First off, don't take quotes out of context.

First, what you have done is called quote mining — taking a quote, or a partial quote and posting it out of context so that it seems the author said or means something they did not say or mean.

«taking a quote, or a partial quote and posting it out of context so that it seems the author said or means something they did not say or mean.»

deGrasse Tyson's perceived tolerance or intolerance notwithstanding, the «context» you provided doesn't shed any additional light on the quote.

The context had absolutely nothing to do whether or not the writer of the quote could «back it up», prove it.

I did not distort, I merely put into context the scripture you quoted and singled out.

In other words, the quote is being used within the context of a theological position and it means what they assert it to mean (or don't even bother to assert, but merely assume we should see) at least partially because of their presuppositions with which they come to the text.

Why is quote mining and taking statements out of context OK for a Creationist to do with Origin, but not OK for an atheist to do with the Bible?

Yet McGrath demonstrates that this single quote was torn badly out of context, and that Tertullian's real attitude was that «there is nothing that God does not wish to be investigated and understood by reason.»

I'm not trying to intimidate you — just pointing out that partial quotes out of context are obvious and do not help your cause.

If they ever floated into view, unless chapter and verse were also quoted in a very circumscribed context, they were dismissed as «liberal», «socialist», «unrealistic», «under the law», «wimpy do - good social gospel» — you get the drift.

When I quoted «do away with the yoke of oppression, with the pointing finger and malicious talk» it was in the context of your admission «I lean towards the pointing finger» you have not address this.

Because the devil did what most of us do — He quoted verses out of context.

Let's read the quote in context: Matthew 16:15 - 18 «He said to them, «But who do you say that I am?»

Let me give you just one of many, many quotes from the Koran, (and please don't bother with the old «don't - quote - out - of - context» ploy):

You obviously do not get the context of the verse you quoted from the Bible.

please do, because I honestly doubt you could pull a direct quote from a single post and point to it as an example of any of that, unless you completely took it out of context, and warped the meaning it had within the whole, to a meaning that suits your ends.

The mind can and does provide justification for anything it chooses to, typically through selective out - of - context quoting and creative interpretation (innovation), and each mind is free to make its own choices.

As an aside, I think the quote about «Others can set the boundaries...» is fairly context specific — I don't think it is a statement on boundary setting and criticism in general.

and please don't start quoting the OT — out of context — ... there is something called progressive revelation.

American atheists don't learn about the world or study history except a few quotes of Jefferson, and that one even out of the whole historical context as usual.

Not only that, but two of the verses we quote out of context come from a passage where we are not to hypocritically condemn others yet do the same things ourselves!

If you do not know Christ (He is in scripture from Genesis through Revelation, if you cared to look), except for the usual few well - known and - worn quotes out of context, why are you writing about Him?

I think these ideas gain purchase because so few people actually do read the Bible and make a few out of context quotes that htey use for all decisions.

Please don't just pull out the quotes that you need [out of context] to score cheap points.

Since I don't have a Koran and have never read one, I couldn't tell about your «quoted statements», but my first thought was that they may have been taken out of context.

I know what I believe and it does not match up with what they say I believe, however many quotes they rip out of context.

In context, this goes... «When I quote chapter and verse it strengthens my argument, but when you quote chapter and verse it weakens yours because you don't believe the bible.»

For example, quoting scripture «bear fruit and multiply» can be a perversion if we don't interpret scripture in context.

So spouting out some quote out of context doesn't mean much.

In the context of Net Neutrality debate, one often hears claims that «X % of people live in the area with only one cable internet provider» (last one I heard was a podcast so don't recall exact # they quoted).

(And Irrawaddy had a good discussion of Burma and the UN in the context of Libya, which I quoted, and clearly don't fail the test of not giving a toss about the example they are citing).

I don't see any reasonable interpretation of, (or indeed, context for) the quotes from that video that can make one conclude otherwise.

But like so many results in this field, it has become a politicized «talking point», shorn of its context, that is mis - quoted and mis - used by many who should (and often do) know better.

Some responders were understandably confused by a line Jimmy quoted out of context from our book: «don't count vegetables as as a carb source — they are a fiber (and therefore a fat) source» (page 45).

Russian Brides Cyber Guide considers a quote «fair» if any single quote does not exceed 200 words and does not change the sense of what was said, if taken out of the context.

A few quotes from famous people are thrown in as flashy garbage, but have no coherence and add no context, as much as you might wish they did.

Okay, it's a lot funnier than it sounds, believe me, and in doing so, we were granted with what is perhaps the best out - of - context quote to use in any situation:

You need to be doing something with the information — applying the formula, putting the quote in context, creating revision cards by topic and theme and adding your own thoughts and questions as you go.

+ ANSWER BOOKLETS This resource includes: - 3 power - points with plenty of questions and varied exercises to guide your students through the book - Different worksheets with questions related to each chapter to help your students analyse the book - Some analysis of extracts and quotes - Reading activity from a news article to understand the social context - NEW answer booklets for each chapter I will soon add the next chapters so please do not hesitate to visit my shop: https://www.tes.com/teaching-resources/shop/MllePierre I will also add answer booklets for all the chapters from now on!

Of course, I realize that by quoting these excerpts out of context, I do them a disservice.

Tim: And for the record I replied to Dave's email that I do not believe I used his 2/19/14 SacBee quote out of context, that it was not limited to the state's decision not to publish student scores from this year's field test.

Take something that doesn't actually mean anything when taken out of context and quote it, like it's some kind of self explanatory zen BS that only someone as smart as the quoter could possibly understand.

I could write an essay showing how the Bible encourages economic and political freedom, and opposes totalitarianism, but I would quote very different Scriptures, but do so in their proper context.

Once you're done roasting your buddies with out of context quotes, you can move on to another newcomer for the Jackbox Party Pack series: Monster Seeking Monster.

In the context of THE ANGRY SHOW, though — where the didactics are scrawled in black felt tip over white walls and Jake Kent quotes UK punks Crass in «Do they owe us a living?

Bradford pursues what he has termed «social abstraction», that is, «abstract art with a social or political context clinging to the edges» (Mark Bradford, quoted in Calvin Tomkins, «What Else Can Art Do?»

Lindzen may have put his foot in his mouth (I don't see a direct quote in the «Reason» article, so I guess it's possible his wager invitation was taken out - of - context), but what about the rest?