In a professional learning community teams of teachers are
continually analyzing student learning.
The program
continually analyzes student progress for teachers and maintains an individualized learning path for each learner.
Powered by Knewton, Waggle looks for more than correct answers and
continually analyzes each student's decisions and progress.
Not exact matches
I think the process has helped me look at my teaching practice in a different light; I
analyze lessons more carefully now, and am
continually asking myself how each lesson will improve
student learning.
How can teachers be enabled to collect evidence of
student learning that captures the most important goals they are pursuing, and then to
analyze and reflect on this evidence — individually and collectively — to
continually improve their teaching?