At Jim Hansen's now famous congressional testimony given in the hot summer of 1988, he showed GISS model projections of
continued global warming assuming further increases in human produced greenhouse gases.
Not exact matches
The analysis follows previous studies that show that a business - as - usual scenario, which
assumes a
continued growth of
global emissions, would deliver a
warming increase of 4.5 °C by 2100.
Until then, if each and every remedy is also part and parcel of the standard liberal agenda, most Americans will
continue to
assume that
Global Warming is the liberal version of the GWOT.
One widely - used model
assumes that economic growth rates will not be affected by climate change, thereby predicting that half of the world's economic activity would
continue after a whopping 18 degrees C of
global warming.
F&R still use the trick of
assuming that everything except the three short - term effects they considered is a «
global warming signal» that will obviously
continue «unabated» for «the next few decades».
By the way, despite almost everybody
assuming that
global warming should
continue sometime in the near future, once the recovery ends the most probable outcome would be a return to Holocene general cooling and I don't think we can put enough GHGs in the atmosphere to prevent that from happening.
If people
assumed a
continued global warming (as the AGW promoters do now) rate of about 0.15 deg C in the 1940s, they would have been found to be wrong now as shown in the following graph.
The INDCs in the Paris Agreement,
assuming no further progress with the pledges, would put the world on track for a
global temperature increase of 3.5 °C (6.3 °F) above pre-industrial levels, with a range of uncertainty from 2.1 to 4.7 °C (3.7 to 8.4 °F), down from the 4.5 °C (8.1 °F) of
warming expected if nations
continue business - as - usual.
Let us
assume the «natural»
global warming during the period 1910 - 1940
continued.