Sentences with phrase «continues business as usual with»

The current financial regulatory environment post-Dodd-Frank continues business as usual with a more complex bureaucracy, with likely more infighting between competing regulators.

The Incorrigibles may then continue business as usual with no bother about pesky health issues.

Actually, due to the severe consequences of contributing to people's attitudes to continue business as usual with respect to GHG emissions, this is much more than just a duty NOT to imply and mislead, this like a 11th Commandment which thou shalt NOT break.

Not exact matches

As an immigrant entrepreneur, I'm going to continue with business as usuaAs an immigrant entrepreneur, I'm going to continue with business as usuaas usual.

«While this process continues, it is business as usual for team members, customers and partners with no changes to current structures, practices and processes.»

Rather than continuing down the road with a «business as usual» approach, perhaps it's time to take massive action and correct course.

On its relationship with Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the conglomerate said, «With the exception of some modest asset - backed financing provided to some of our leasing subsidiaries, where business continues as usual, HNA Group has never engaged B.A.M.L. for any significant business.&rawith Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the conglomerate said, «With the exception of some modest asset - backed financing provided to some of our leasing subsidiaries, where business continues as usual, HNA Group has never engaged B.A.M.L. for any significant business.&raWith the exception of some modest asset - backed financing provided to some of our leasing subsidiaries, where business continues as usual, HNA Group has never engaged B.A.M.L. for any significant business.»

For Wirlu - murra it is still continues to be business as usual, with qualified WMYAC members still able to undertake important heritage survey work.

CHINA EMBRACES THE LOW CARBON ECONOMY China needs energy and lots of it, but it has realized that it can't continue with business as usual.

In the aftermath of the Holocaust, neither Judaism nor Christianity can continue with business as usual, lest they betray this new revelation.

However, with limited transfer performance, the same old Arsenal is continued with the boring business as usual approach.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Instead we are seeing business as usual, with the social cleansing of London continuing across the capital.»

The response of Europe's mainstream politicians was benign neglect and they continued with business as usual.

WE can not continue with business as usual, and cutting employees is the main direction in cutting costs.

By looking at the problem on a global scale, we have calculated that if four of these strategies are applied at the same time we could actually stabilize the number of people in the world who are facing water stress rather than continue to allow their numbers to grow, which is what will happen if we continue with business as usual.»

«But, by looking at the problem on a global scale, we have calculated that if four of these strategies are applied at the same time we could actually stabilize the number of people in the world who are facing water stress rather than continue to allow their numbers to grow, which is what will happen if we continue with business as usual.»

«Our model assumes «business as usual» in the province, with high carbon emissions and climate change continuing at the current rate.

They looked at each of those conditions through, first, a business - as - usual lens that assumes a lack of international climate - policy action with continued high rates of greenhouse gas emissions and, second, an optimistic scenario of reduced emissions with climate change policy interventions.

Their intent, apparently, was to disparage the views of scientists who disagree with their contention that continued business - as - usual increases in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced from the burning of coal, gas, and oil will lead to a host of cataclysmic climate - related problems.

«If we continue with business as usual,» Melillo says, «plants» ability to store carbon will be maxed out.»

But let's suppose events follow the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's «business as usual» scenario, with greenhouse emissions continuing...

«If we continue with business - as - usual emissions, extreme seasons will inevitably become the norm within decades and Australia will be the canary in the coal mine that will experience this change first,» said Dr Lewis.

If we continue along a business as usual path with greenhouse gases increasing faster and faster, then it's going to become impossible to avoid losing the Arctic, for example.

Every year that we continue with business as usual, it's going to be harder to meet target climate goals.

A1B is the «Business as Usual» scenario, with emissions continuing to increase in line with present - day rates of increase.

And yet, it's also possible that up to 44 % of the carbon grabbed by these plentiful diatoms could be left in the atmosphere, if we continue with business as usual.

It has been argued [97]--[98] that continued business - as - usual CO2 emissions are likely to spur a nonlinear response with multi-meter sea level rise this century.

Since it is based on data, it can serve as a better way to make decisions instead of just continuing with business as usual.

Here, I made a quick point about bad news: It generally assumes wewill continue with business as usual, doing nothing about the causes of climatechange.

Even some administrators were under the impression that everything was fine, that they were going to be able to transition back to Orleans Parish [School Board oversight], get a building and continue with business as usual.

Schools were randomly allocated to receive either the TEEP training or continue with «business as usual».

Continue business as usual and watch its fortunes continue to decline or find a partner with deep pockets, adopt world class standards in designing and building cars - and yet maintain a spirit true to theContinue business as usual and watch its fortunes continue to decline or find a partner with deep pockets, adopt world class standards in designing and building cars - and yet maintain a spirit true to thecontinue to decline or find a partner with deep pockets, adopt world class standards in designing and building cars - and yet maintain a spirit true to the marque.

All our offices will continue to operate as usual, with a mandate to grow the business in each of our territories.

My point was that Amazon just tipped its hand, and the strategy looks like beat trad pub into submission, and once it is pliant, then continue with business as usual.

Your mortgage broker will continue to work with the banks, credit unions and mortgage companies so nothing has changed in that regard — business as usual.

As a mortgage broker I will continue to work with the banks, credit unions and mortgage companies so nothing has changed in that regard — business as usuaAs a mortgage broker I will continue to work with the banks, credit unions and mortgage companies so nothing has changed in that regard — business as usuaas usual.

American said it expects to continue normal business operations throughout the reorganisation process - with normal flight schedules operating, tickets and reservations honoured as usual, along with normal refunds and exchanges.

Another worker briefly stops working to look at her boss; other workers continue on with business as usual.

On the other side was a longer text claiming that since the gallery initially promised to work with the community, it had subsequently continued business as usual.

Isn't this a surreal transition time when many people continue with business as usual, chomping up the comforts of our world and choosing to ignore every trend except maybe global warming, and others feel that the life signs of our planet are declining so fast that it's already too late no matter what we do.

There are some painful, and even dire, concerns expressed about the potential that Greenland ice sheets could be «entirely lost» if emissions continue at a business - as - usual pace; about the rate of sea - level rise increasing «faster and faster with time»; and about the planet's ice sheets likely becoming «more active» over coming decades than they have been over recent decades.

We (collectively) could be amazingly stupid and continue with business as usual.

The inevitable uncertainty associated with planetary climate declarations is being exploited by those who have financial incentives to continue business as usual, mostly the fossil fuel and power companies.

I reject the idea that it is somehow inappropriate to acknowledge that catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is not only possible but plausible if we continue with anything close to business as usual consumption of fossil fuels and the other activities that are contributing to ever - increasing GHG emissions.

Further to that, if all of these questions were satisfactorily answered, what would be the impact of continuing business as usual, only with different energy sources?

Or we can just leave it to fate and continue on with a business - as - usual type of attitude.

The environmental movement is making bigger waves than ever and although the faces may have changed, the message is still the same: we can not continue with business as usual.

The science is clear to me and to most experts in the various fields associated with climate science: Humans are causing most of the observed global warming in the past several decades and, if we continue emitting GHGs under a «business as usual» scenario, it will become increasingly difficult and costly to adapt to the changes that are likely to occur.

Yet if the world continues with business as usual, failing to address the climate issue, the earth's temperature during this century could easily rise by 6 degrees Celsius (11 degrees Fahrenheit).